Editorial Commentary: The Importance of Rigorous Testing for Artificial Intelligence Solutions: Don't Forget to Flip Over the Page and Answer All the Questions!

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Tyler Khilnani, Kyle N Kunze
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: The Importance of Rigorous Testing for Artificial Intelligence Solutions: Don't Forget to Flip Over the Page and Answer All the Questions!","authors":"Tyler Khilnani, Kyle N Kunze","doi":"10.1002/arj.70568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Manual Current Procedural Terminology coding for billing purposes is labor-intensive, error-prone, and imposes a substantial administrative burden on physicians and care teams. As interest in artificial intelligence applied to health care inefficiencies grows, appropriately designed solutions may optimize billing and coding workflows by improving efficiency and accuracy. Recent locally deployed models have shown promise in providing scalable function while protecting patient data. However, these models have shown success only when provided contextual clues in the setting of verification, with performance dropping to near chance when such context is withheld. In addition, the current evaluation has been limited to verification rather than prospective code generation from operative reports. These models also have not been shown to distinguish closely related codes or apply multiple codes to a single procedure, severely limiting their applicability to real-world practice. Future investigations must therefore focus on developing models that prospectively generate Current Procedural Terminology codes, independently verify and flag incorrect codes, and achieve external validity across multiple institutions, disciplines, and documentation styles before they are ready for clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2746-2748"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70568","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manual Current Procedural Terminology coding for billing purposes is labor-intensive, error-prone, and imposes a substantial administrative burden on physicians and care teams. As interest in artificial intelligence applied to health care inefficiencies grows, appropriately designed solutions may optimize billing and coding workflows by improving efficiency and accuracy. Recent locally deployed models have shown promise in providing scalable function while protecting patient data. However, these models have shown success only when provided contextual clues in the setting of verification, with performance dropping to near chance when such context is withheld. In addition, the current evaluation has been limited to verification rather than prospective code generation from operative reports. These models also have not been shown to distinguish closely related codes or apply multiple codes to a single procedure, severely limiting their applicability to real-world practice. Future investigations must therefore focus on developing models that prospectively generate Current Procedural Terminology codes, independently verify and flag incorrect codes, and achieve external validity across multiple institutions, disciplines, and documentation styles before they are ready for clinical implementation.

编辑评论:严格测试人工智能解决方案的重要性:不要忘记翻页并回答所有问题!
用于计费目的的手动当前程序术语编码是劳动密集型的,容易出错,并且给医生和护理团队带来了大量的管理负担。随着人们对将人工智能应用于医疗保健低效率领域的兴趣日益浓厚,适当设计的解决方案可以通过提高效率和准确性来优化计费和编码工作流程。最近的本地部署模型显示出在保护患者数据的同时提供可扩展功能的希望。然而,这些模型只有在验证设置中提供上下文线索时才显示出成功,而当这种上下文被保留时,性能下降到接近偶然。此外,目前的评估仅限于验证,而不是从操作报告中生成预期的代码。这些模型也没有显示出区分密切相关的代码或将多个代码应用于单个程序,严重限制了它们对现实世界实践的适用性。因此,未来的研究必须集中在开发模型上,这些模型可以产生当前程序术语代码,独立验证和标记不正确的代码,并在临床实施之前实现跨多个机构、学科和文档风格的外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书