Workplace Distractions and Patient Safety Culture in Operating Rooms: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sinem Gecit, Alper Akyuz, Meryem Yavuz van Giersbergen
{"title":"Workplace Distractions and Patient Safety Culture in Operating Rooms: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Sinem Gecit, Alper Akyuz, Meryem Yavuz van Giersbergen","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the association between operating room distractions and patient safety culture among multidisciplinary perioperative professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in the operating rooms of a university hospital in western Türkiye between October and December 2025. Data were collected from 80 health care professionals (30 nurses, 30 physicians, and 20 anesthesia technicians) using the Operating Room Distractions Index and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurses reported significantly higher distraction frequency than anesthesia technicians and physicians across several operating room distraction dimensions, with moderate to large effect sizes (η2=0.16-0.29). Communication-related distractions showed significant differences in contribution to error and target blocking, suggesting that communication interruptions may disrupt thought processes and increase the potential for error. Overall distraction frequency was negatively associated with organizational learning-continuous improvement (r=-0.229, P=0.041) and patient safety support from supervisors and clinical leaders (r=-0.233, P=0.037). No significant correlations were observed between distraction frequency and other patient safety culture dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perceived operating room distractions varied across professional roles and were selectively associated with key dimensions of patient safety culture, particularly organizational learning. Communication-related interruptions may be especially important because they can disrupt thought processes and task progression. Addressing modifiable environmental and communication-related disruptions and strengthening system-level safety processes may contribute to safer surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the association between operating room distractions and patient safety culture among multidisciplinary perioperative professionals.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the operating rooms of a university hospital in western Türkiye between October and December 2025. Data were collected from 80 health care professionals (30 nurses, 30 physicians, and 20 anesthesia technicians) using the Operating Room Distractions Index and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation analysis were performed.

Results: Nurses reported significantly higher distraction frequency than anesthesia technicians and physicians across several operating room distraction dimensions, with moderate to large effect sizes (η2=0.16-0.29). Communication-related distractions showed significant differences in contribution to error and target blocking, suggesting that communication interruptions may disrupt thought processes and increase the potential for error. Overall distraction frequency was negatively associated with organizational learning-continuous improvement (r=-0.229, P=0.041) and patient safety support from supervisors and clinical leaders (r=-0.233, P=0.037). No significant correlations were observed between distraction frequency and other patient safety culture dimensions.

Conclusions: Perceived operating room distractions varied across professional roles and were selectively associated with key dimensions of patient safety culture, particularly organizational learning. Communication-related interruptions may be especially important because they can disrupt thought processes and task progression. Addressing modifiable environmental and communication-related disruptions and strengthening system-level safety processes may contribute to safer surgical care.

工作场所干扰与手术室患者安全文化:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是研究多学科围手术期专业人员手术室干扰与患者安全文化之间的关系。方法:本横断面研究于2025年10月至12月在约旦西部一所大学医院的手术室进行。使用手术室干扰指数和医院患者安全文化调查2.0收集了80名卫生保健专业人员(30名护士、30名医生和20名麻醉技术人员)的数据。采用描述性统计、单因素方差分析和Pearson相关分析。结果:在手术室分心的几个维度上,护士报告的分心频率明显高于麻醉技术人员和医生,影响大小中至大(η2=0.16-0.29)。与沟通相关的干扰对错误和目标阻塞的贡献有显著差异,表明沟通中断可能会干扰思维过程,增加出错的可能性。总体分心频率与组织学习持续改进(r=-0.229, P=0.041)和主管和临床领导的患者安全支持(r=-0.233, P=0.037)呈负相关。分心频率与其他患者安全培养维度之间无显著相关性。结论:手术室干扰的感知因专业角色而异,并选择性地与患者安全文化的关键维度相关,特别是组织学习。与沟通相关的干扰可能尤其重要,因为它们会扰乱思维过程和任务进展。处理可改变的环境和通信相关的中断以及加强系统级安全流程可能有助于更安全的手术护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书