Factors associated with student satisfaction in a chiropractic program at a South African university: A cross-sectional study.

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sharné Naidoo, Justin Paul Brown
{"title":"Factors associated with student satisfaction in a chiropractic program at a South African university: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sharné Naidoo, Justin Paul Brown","doi":"10.7899/JCE-26-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors associated with student satisfaction in a South African chiropractic program and to determine how these factors related to overall student satisfaction. Comparisons between the year of study and overall satisfaction were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, quantitative study design was adopted. Data were collected via an online survey distributed to chiropractic students in undergraduate and postgraduate programs (n = 242). The adapted questionnaire rated satisfaction factors on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely dissatisfied to 5 = completely satisfied). Data analysis included frequency counts, descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analyses, along with normality and comparison analyses. Regression analysis determined the relationship between overall satisfaction and the identified factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 50.83% response rate was achieved (n = 123). The exploratory factor analysis yielded 3 key factors: course, teaching and evaluation, and clinical training, as well as career guidance. Respondents expressed satisfaction with the course delivery and clinical training (median = 4.00) but were neutral regarding career guidance (median = 3.00). Course, Teaching and Evaluation Methods (P = .77), Clinical Training (P = .59), and Career Exploration After Graduation (P = .49) were statistically significant with General Satisfaction. All factors were positively associated with overall satisfaction, which was satisfactory (median = 4.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, students' satisfaction with the chiropractic program was high across the course, teaching and evaluation methods, and clinical training. Improvements are required in the career guidance domain, and student satisfaction declined between the academic years.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13520414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-26-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with student satisfaction in a South African chiropractic program and to determine how these factors related to overall student satisfaction. Comparisons between the year of study and overall satisfaction were also investigated.

Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative study design was adopted. Data were collected via an online survey distributed to chiropractic students in undergraduate and postgraduate programs (n = 242). The adapted questionnaire rated satisfaction factors on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely dissatisfied to 5 = completely satisfied). Data analysis included frequency counts, descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analyses, along with normality and comparison analyses. Regression analysis determined the relationship between overall satisfaction and the identified factors.

Results: A 50.83% response rate was achieved (n = 123). The exploratory factor analysis yielded 3 key factors: course, teaching and evaluation, and clinical training, as well as career guidance. Respondents expressed satisfaction with the course delivery and clinical training (median = 4.00) but were neutral regarding career guidance (median = 3.00). Course, Teaching and Evaluation Methods (P = .77), Clinical Training (P = .59), and Career Exploration After Graduation (P = .49) were statistically significant with General Satisfaction. All factors were positively associated with overall satisfaction, which was satisfactory (median = 4.00).

Conclusions: Overall, students' satisfaction with the chiropractic program was high across the course, teaching and evaluation methods, and clinical training. Improvements are required in the career guidance domain, and student satisfaction declined between the academic years.

南非一所大学脊椎指压治疗项目中与学生满意度相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在确定南非脊椎指压疗法项目中与学生满意度相关的因素,并确定这些因素与学生总体满意度的关系。研究人员还对学习年限和总体满意度进行了比较。方法:采用横断面定量研究设计。数据通过在线调查收集,调查对象为本科生和研究生脊椎指压治疗专业的学生(n = 242)。改编后的问卷以5分李克特量表(1 =完全不满意至5 =完全满意)对满意度因素进行评级。数据分析包括频率计数、描述性统计、探索性因子分析和可靠性分析,以及正态性和比较分析。回归分析确定了总体满意度与确定因素之间的关系。结果:总有效率为50.83% (n = 123)。探索性因素分析得出课程、教学与评价、临床培训、职业指导3个关键因素。受访者对课程交付和临床培训表示满意(中位数= 4.00),但对职业指导表示中立(中位数= 3.00)。课程设置、教学与评价方法(P = 0.77)、临床培训(P = 0.59)、毕业后职业探索(P = 0.49)总体满意度均有统计学意义。所有因素与总体满意度呈正相关,总体满意度为满意(中位数= 4.00)。结论:总体而言,学生对整脊课程、教学、评估方法和临床培训的满意度较高。在职业指导领域需要改进,学生满意度在学年之间下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书