William R Lippincott, Robert J Malahowski, Keith J Nowicki, Christopher J Mann
{"title":"Near-field acoustic holography with iteratively reweighted least squares-based outlier rejection and TV+ℓ1 regularization.","authors":"William R Lippincott, Robert J Malahowski, Keith J Nowicki, Christopher J Mann","doi":"10.1121/10.0046396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Near-field acoustic holography (NAH) reconstructs complex acoustic pressure fields from near-field microphone measurements. The equivalent source method (ESM), which relies on least squares inversion, is highly susceptible to measurement outliers. To address this, we present an ESM-NAH reconstruction approach, iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS)-total variation (TV) and ℓ1 regularization (IRLS-TV+ℓ1), which employs bounded-influence M-estimation with IRLS to mitigate the impact of outlier-contaminated measurements. In addition, the method incorporates TV and ℓ1 regularization to capture both extended and compact source features. To evaluate performance, we simulate a piecewise-constant block source on a 16 × 16 grid at 25 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), with 5% of channels corrupted by outliers. The proposed method achieves a reconstruction relative error of 4.4% under outlier contamination, compared to 4.3% for uncorrupted data. By comparison, Tikhonov regularization degrades from 15.9% to 96.3% relative error, sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) from 26.1% to 195% relative error, and the fused total generalized variation (F-TGV) benchmark from 7.8% to 168% relative error. Experimental measurements further indicate degradation factors of 11.5×, 14.0×, and 15.9× for Tikhonov, SBL, and F-TGV, respectively, under 5% introduced outlier contamination, whereas IRLS-TV+ℓ1 exhibits only a 1.02× increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"160 3","pages":"2288-2300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0046396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Near-field acoustic holography (NAH) reconstructs complex acoustic pressure fields from near-field microphone measurements. The equivalent source method (ESM), which relies on least squares inversion, is highly susceptible to measurement outliers. To address this, we present an ESM-NAH reconstruction approach, iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS)-total variation (TV) and ℓ1 regularization (IRLS-TV+ℓ1), which employs bounded-influence M-estimation with IRLS to mitigate the impact of outlier-contaminated measurements. In addition, the method incorporates TV and ℓ1 regularization to capture both extended and compact source features. To evaluate performance, we simulate a piecewise-constant block source on a 16 × 16 grid at 25 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), with 5% of channels corrupted by outliers. The proposed method achieves a reconstruction relative error of 4.4% under outlier contamination, compared to 4.3% for uncorrupted data. By comparison, Tikhonov regularization degrades from 15.9% to 96.3% relative error, sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) from 26.1% to 195% relative error, and the fused total generalized variation (F-TGV) benchmark from 7.8% to 168% relative error. Experimental measurements further indicate degradation factors of 11.5×, 14.0×, and 15.9× for Tikhonov, SBL, and F-TGV, respectively, under 5% introduced outlier contamination, whereas IRLS-TV+ℓ1 exhibits only a 1.02× increase.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.