Bursting Parameters Alter Excitatory Postsynaptic Currents in Nucleus Tractus Solitarius Neurons: Implications for Clinical Vagus Nerve Stimulation

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Misty Marie Owens, Aleksandra Radovic, Eric Beaumont
{"title":"Bursting Parameters Alter Excitatory Postsynaptic Currents in Nucleus Tractus Solitarius Neurons: Implications for Clinical Vagus Nerve Stimulation","authors":"Misty Marie Owens,&nbsp;Aleksandra Radovic,&nbsp;Eric Beaumont","doi":"10.1111/jnc.70557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved therapy for multiple neurological and autonomic disorders; however, the mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects and optimal stimulation parameters remain poorly understood. Vagal afferents activated by VNS terminate within the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), where sensory information is integrated and propagated throughout central autonomic networks. Although conventional VNS paradigms are used therapeutically, previous studies have demonstrated high rates of synaptic transmission failure within NTS circuits, suggesting that alternative stimulation strategies could enhance neural activity. Bursting VNS has emerged as a promising alternative to standard stimulation patterns, but its effects on NTS neuronal processing remain unclear. The present study used voltage-clamp recordings in rat brainstem slices to study NTS neurons, with solitary tract (ST) stimulation delivered using single-pulse or bursting parameters to evoke excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Bursting paradigms varying in frequency (150–350 Hz) and pulse number (2–4 pulses per burst) were compared with single-pulse stimulation. EPSC amplitude and total area under the curve (AUC) were used to quantify stimulation responses. In NTS neurons monosynaptically connected to ST afferents, bursting paradigms significantly reduced the amplitude of the first EPSC relative to single-pulse stimulation, whereas no differences in overall AUC were observed. In contrast, polysynaptic neurons exhibited burst-dependent differences in excitatory transmission, with differences observed relative to baseline and across pulse conditions. Specifically, AUC was significantly greater during lower-frequency (150–250 Hz) 3- and/or 4-pulse bursts compared with single-pulse stimulation. Across all frequencies tested, 3- and/or 4-pulse bursts also produced significantly greater AUC than the corresponding 2-pulse paradigm. These findings indicate that bursting stimulation differentially modulates excitatory transmission in monosynaptic and polysynaptic NTS neurons, with specific pulse and frequency combinations preferentially influencing higher-order NTS circuitry and providing insight into stimulation strategies that may improve central network engagement during clinical VNS.</p>\n <p>\n \n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurochemistry","volume":"170 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnc.70557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved therapy for multiple neurological and autonomic disorders; however, the mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects and optimal stimulation parameters remain poorly understood. Vagal afferents activated by VNS terminate within the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), where sensory information is integrated and propagated throughout central autonomic networks. Although conventional VNS paradigms are used therapeutically, previous studies have demonstrated high rates of synaptic transmission failure within NTS circuits, suggesting that alternative stimulation strategies could enhance neural activity. Bursting VNS has emerged as a promising alternative to standard stimulation patterns, but its effects on NTS neuronal processing remain unclear. The present study used voltage-clamp recordings in rat brainstem slices to study NTS neurons, with solitary tract (ST) stimulation delivered using single-pulse or bursting parameters to evoke excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Bursting paradigms varying in frequency (150–350 Hz) and pulse number (2–4 pulses per burst) were compared with single-pulse stimulation. EPSC amplitude and total area under the curve (AUC) were used to quantify stimulation responses. In NTS neurons monosynaptically connected to ST afferents, bursting paradigms significantly reduced the amplitude of the first EPSC relative to single-pulse stimulation, whereas no differences in overall AUC were observed. In contrast, polysynaptic neurons exhibited burst-dependent differences in excitatory transmission, with differences observed relative to baseline and across pulse conditions. Specifically, AUC was significantly greater during lower-frequency (150–250 Hz) 3- and/or 4-pulse bursts compared with single-pulse stimulation. Across all frequencies tested, 3- and/or 4-pulse bursts also produced significantly greater AUC than the corresponding 2-pulse paradigm. These findings indicate that bursting stimulation differentially modulates excitatory transmission in monosynaptic and polysynaptic NTS neurons, with specific pulse and frequency combinations preferentially influencing higher-order NTS circuitry and providing insight into stimulation strategies that may improve central network engagement during clinical VNS.

破裂参数改变孤束核神经元的兴奋性突触后电流:对临床迷走神经刺激的意义。
迷走神经刺激(VNS)是一种被批准的治疗多种神经和自主神经疾病的方法;然而,其治疗效果的机制和最佳刺激参数仍然知之甚少。VNS激活的迷走神经事件终止于孤束核(NTS),在那里感觉信息被整合并通过中央自主神经网络传播。虽然传统的VNS模式被用于治疗,但先前的研究表明NTS回路中的突触传递失败率很高,这表明替代刺激策略可以增强神经活动。爆裂VNS已成为标准刺激模式的一种有希望的替代方案,但其对NTS神经元处理的影响尚不清楚。本研究使用电压钳记录大鼠脑干切片来研究NTS神经元,并使用单脉冲或爆发参数进行孤立束(ST)刺激,以唤起兴奋性突触后电流(EPSCs)。不同频率(150-350 Hz)和脉冲数(每脉冲2-4次)的爆发模式与单脉冲刺激进行了比较。EPSC振幅和曲线下总面积(AUC)被用来量化刺激反应。在与ST传入事件单突触连接的NTS神经元中,与单脉冲刺激相比,爆发范式显著降低了第一次EPSC的振幅,而总体AUC没有差异。相比之下,多突触神经元在兴奋传递中表现出突发依赖性差异,与基线和跨脉冲条件有关。具体来说,与单脉冲刺激相比,在较低频率(150-250 Hz)的3脉冲和/或4脉冲刺激下,AUC明显更高。在所有测试频率中,3脉冲和/或4脉冲脉冲产生的AUC也明显高于相应的2脉冲脉冲模式。这些发现表明,爆发刺激对单突触和多突触NTS神经元的兴奋性传递有不同的调节作用,特定的脉冲和频率组合优先影响高阶NTS电路,并为临床VNS期间可能改善中枢网络参与的刺激策略提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurochemistry
Journal of Neurochemistry 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurochemistry focuses on molecular, cellular and biochemical aspects of the nervous system, the pathogenesis of neurological disorders and the development of disease specific biomarkers. It is devoted to the prompt publication of original findings of the highest scientific priority and value that provide novel mechanistic insights, represent a clear advance over previous studies and have the potential to generate exciting future research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书