{"title":"Eliminating Equity: A Culture-Centered Reading of the Attack on Health Equity in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership.","authors":"Mohan J Dutta","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2026.2734166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Project 2025's <i>Mandate for Leadership</i> proposes a sweeping reorganization of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This article reads the <i>Mandate</i>'s HHS chapter through the culture-centered approach (CCA), joining its account of structure, culture, agency, voice, and communicative inequality to a critical discourse analysis of the chapter's mission statement, its five governing goals, and its data provisions. The chapter does more than oppose equity policies. It reorganizes the conceptual and infrastructural conditions under which health inequity can be named, measured, and redressed. To describe that work the article develops communicative eliminationism: the administrative withdrawal of the categories that make the structural determinants of health visible to evidence, funding, and care. Five operations carry the withdrawal, recoding, un-naming, conditioning, displacing, and enumerating, and they reach three registers of increasing depth, from the recoding of a category through its administrative un-naming to the withdrawal of the infrastructure that sustains it. The chapter recodes equity as ideology, un-names disfavored forms of care, redistributes the power of refusal, installs a sacralized family form as a metric of health, and turns health surveillance from recognition toward monitoring. Read alongside the normative rationales its own authors offer, the chapter suspends each rationale exactly where it would protect the populations it names, and that asymmetry is the strongest evidence for the eliminationist reading. On culture-centered premises, defending health equity means protecting the infrastructures of recognition and organizing for structural transformation, not culturally sensitive communication inside categories that are being erased.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2734166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership proposes a sweeping reorganization of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This article reads the Mandate's HHS chapter through the culture-centered approach (CCA), joining its account of structure, culture, agency, voice, and communicative inequality to a critical discourse analysis of the chapter's mission statement, its five governing goals, and its data provisions. The chapter does more than oppose equity policies. It reorganizes the conceptual and infrastructural conditions under which health inequity can be named, measured, and redressed. To describe that work the article develops communicative eliminationism: the administrative withdrawal of the categories that make the structural determinants of health visible to evidence, funding, and care. Five operations carry the withdrawal, recoding, un-naming, conditioning, displacing, and enumerating, and they reach three registers of increasing depth, from the recoding of a category through its administrative un-naming to the withdrawal of the infrastructure that sustains it. The chapter recodes equity as ideology, un-names disfavored forms of care, redistributes the power of refusal, installs a sacralized family form as a metric of health, and turns health surveillance from recognition toward monitoring. Read alongside the normative rationales its own authors offer, the chapter suspends each rationale exactly where it would protect the populations it names, and that asymmetry is the strongest evidence for the eliminationist reading. On culture-centered premises, defending health equity means protecting the infrastructures of recognition and organizing for structural transformation, not culturally sensitive communication inside categories that are being erased.
期刊介绍:
As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.