Eliminating Equity: A Culture-Centered Reading of the Attack on Health Equity in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Mohan J Dutta
{"title":"Eliminating Equity: A Culture-Centered Reading of the Attack on Health Equity in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership.","authors":"Mohan J Dutta","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2026.2734166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Project 2025's <i>Mandate for Leadership</i> proposes a sweeping reorganization of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This article reads the <i>Mandate</i>'s HHS chapter through the culture-centered approach (CCA), joining its account of structure, culture, agency, voice, and communicative inequality to a critical discourse analysis of the chapter's mission statement, its five governing goals, and its data provisions. The chapter does more than oppose equity policies. It reorganizes the conceptual and infrastructural conditions under which health inequity can be named, measured, and redressed. To describe that work the article develops communicative eliminationism: the administrative withdrawal of the categories that make the structural determinants of health visible to evidence, funding, and care. Five operations carry the withdrawal, recoding, un-naming, conditioning, displacing, and enumerating, and they reach three registers of increasing depth, from the recoding of a category through its administrative un-naming to the withdrawal of the infrastructure that sustains it. The chapter recodes equity as ideology, un-names disfavored forms of care, redistributes the power of refusal, installs a sacralized family form as a metric of health, and turns health surveillance from recognition toward monitoring. Read alongside the normative rationales its own authors offer, the chapter suspends each rationale exactly where it would protect the populations it names, and that asymmetry is the strongest evidence for the eliminationist reading. On culture-centered premises, defending health equity means protecting the infrastructures of recognition and organizing for structural transformation, not culturally sensitive communication inside categories that are being erased.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2734166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership proposes a sweeping reorganization of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This article reads the Mandate's HHS chapter through the culture-centered approach (CCA), joining its account of structure, culture, agency, voice, and communicative inequality to a critical discourse analysis of the chapter's mission statement, its five governing goals, and its data provisions. The chapter does more than oppose equity policies. It reorganizes the conceptual and infrastructural conditions under which health inequity can be named, measured, and redressed. To describe that work the article develops communicative eliminationism: the administrative withdrawal of the categories that make the structural determinants of health visible to evidence, funding, and care. Five operations carry the withdrawal, recoding, un-naming, conditioning, displacing, and enumerating, and they reach three registers of increasing depth, from the recoding of a category through its administrative un-naming to the withdrawal of the infrastructure that sustains it. The chapter recodes equity as ideology, un-names disfavored forms of care, redistributes the power of refusal, installs a sacralized family form as a metric of health, and turns health surveillance from recognition toward monitoring. Read alongside the normative rationales its own authors offer, the chapter suspends each rationale exactly where it would protect the populations it names, and that asymmetry is the strongest evidence for the eliminationist reading. On culture-centered premises, defending health equity means protecting the infrastructures of recognition and organizing for structural transformation, not culturally sensitive communication inside categories that are being erased.

消除公平:以文化为中心解读2025项目领导任务中对卫生公平的攻击。
2025年计划的领导任务提议对美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)进行全面重组。本文通过以文化为中心的方法(CCA)来解读《授权》中的HHS章节,将其对结构、文化、机构、声音和沟通不平等的描述与该章节的使命陈述、五个治理目标及其数据规定的批判性话语分析结合起来。这一章不只是反对公平政策。它重新组织了概念和基础设施条件,在这些条件下,卫生不平等可以被命名、衡量和纠正。为了描述这项工作,文章发展了沟通消除主义:行政上撤销那些使健康的结构性决定因素对证据、资金和护理可见的类别。五种操作进行了撤销、重新编码、取消命名、调节、置换和枚举,它们达到了三个深度不断增加的寄存器,从类别的重新编码到其管理上的取消命名,再到维持该类别的基础设施的撤销。这一章将公平重新定义为一种意识形态,取消了不受欢迎的医疗形式,重新分配了拒绝的权力,将神圣的家庭形式作为健康的衡量标准,并将健康监测从认可转变为监督。与作者提供的规范性理由一起阅读,这一章将每一种理由都准确地搁置在它所提到的人群的保护位置上,这种不对称是消除主义阅读的最有力证据。在以文化为中心的前提下,捍卫卫生公平意味着保护承认的基础设施和组织结构转型,而不是在正在被消除的类别内进行文化敏感的交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书