From prior knowledge to data-informed models: a review of Boolean network inference.

IF 7.3 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Pierre Klemmer, Ahmed Abdelmonem Hemedan, Reinhard Schneider, Marek Ostaszewski
{"title":"From prior knowledge to data-informed models: a review of Boolean network inference.","authors":"Pierre Klemmer, Ahmed Abdelmonem Hemedan, Reinhard Schneider, Marek Ostaszewski","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbag499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular mechanisms are highly complex and involve numerous components in non-linear interactions, imposing challenges in analysis and understanding. Networks provide intuitive representations of these systems, enabling visualisation of experimental data and the aggregation of prior knowledge. However, static networks cannot account for key temporal dynamics. Boolean networks address this limitation as discrete dynamical models representing temporal properties of biological regulation through binary variables connected by logical functions, offering scalable frameworks for hypothesis generation while avoiding parameterisation challenges of quantitative modelling approaches. Construction of (Boolean) networks is a mostly manual, labour-intensive and bias-prone process, relying on the review of a large corpora of prior knowledge. This review surveys methods for Boolean network inference that integrate experimental data with or without prior knowledge to automatically construct context-specific, data-informed models. We begin by examining network curation methods from text mining to manual curation given their use as backbones of Boolean networks, then analyse several inference algorithms categorised as heuristic (MIBNI, ATEN, LogicGep, CANTATA, and CellNetOptimizer) and exact (BoNesis, caspo, Sketchbook, RE:IN, and Griffin) methods. For each method, we discuss computational representation, inputs, inference algorithms, and benchmarking. We identify key considerations for method selection, including handling of uncertainty, choice of updating scheme, scalability, and data discretisation challenges. We advise that method selection be guided by the type and extent of available prior knowledge and experimental data, and modelling objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag499","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molecular mechanisms are highly complex and involve numerous components in non-linear interactions, imposing challenges in analysis and understanding. Networks provide intuitive representations of these systems, enabling visualisation of experimental data and the aggregation of prior knowledge. However, static networks cannot account for key temporal dynamics. Boolean networks address this limitation as discrete dynamical models representing temporal properties of biological regulation through binary variables connected by logical functions, offering scalable frameworks for hypothesis generation while avoiding parameterisation challenges of quantitative modelling approaches. Construction of (Boolean) networks is a mostly manual, labour-intensive and bias-prone process, relying on the review of a large corpora of prior knowledge. This review surveys methods for Boolean network inference that integrate experimental data with or without prior knowledge to automatically construct context-specific, data-informed models. We begin by examining network curation methods from text mining to manual curation given their use as backbones of Boolean networks, then analyse several inference algorithms categorised as heuristic (MIBNI, ATEN, LogicGep, CANTATA, and CellNetOptimizer) and exact (BoNesis, caspo, Sketchbook, RE:IN, and Griffin) methods. For each method, we discuss computational representation, inputs, inference algorithms, and benchmarking. We identify key considerations for method selection, including handling of uncertainty, choice of updating scheme, scalability, and data discretisation challenges. We advise that method selection be guided by the type and extent of available prior knowledge and experimental data, and modelling objectives.

从先验知识到数据知情模型:布尔网络推理综述。
分子机制非常复杂,涉及许多非线性相互作用的成分,给分析和理解带来了挑战。网络提供了这些系统的直观表示,使实验数据的可视化和先验知识的聚合成为可能。然而,静态网络不能解释关键的时间动态。布尔网络解决了这一限制,作为通过逻辑函数连接的二元变量表示生物调节时间属性的离散动态模型,为假设生成提供可扩展框架,同时避免了定量建模方法的参数化挑战。(布尔)网络的构建主要是一个人工的、劳动密集型的、容易产生偏差的过程,依赖于对大量先验知识的回顾。本文综述了布尔网络推理的方法,这些方法集成了有或没有先验知识的实验数据,以自动构建特定于上下文的数据知情模型。我们首先研究了从文本挖掘到人工管理的网络管理方法,因为它们被用作布尔网络的主干,然后分析了几种分类为启发式(MIBNI, ATEN, LogicGep, CANTATA和CellNetOptimizer)和精确(BoNesis, caspo, Sketchbook, RE:IN和Griffin)方法的推理算法。对于每种方法,我们讨论了计算表示、输入、推理算法和基准测试。我们确定了方法选择的关键考虑因素,包括处理不确定性、更新方案的选择、可扩展性和数据离散化挑战。我们建议,方法的选择应以现有的先验知识和实验数据的类型和程度以及建模目标为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书