Quality improvement project for minimising red blood cell unit wastage at a secondary referral hospital in Malawi.

IF 2.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Brany Mithi, Edson Mzumara, Kwame Chisi, Robert Fungurani, Jean Nyondo, Arnold Jumbe
{"title":"Quality improvement project for minimising red blood cell unit wastage at a secondary referral hospital in Malawi.","authors":"Brany Mithi, Edson Mzumara, Kwame Chisi, Robert Fungurani, Jean Nyondo, Arnold Jumbe","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2026-004290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Poor blood bank stock management can result in excess or understocking of blood units for transfusion. A retrospective analysis of blood bank records from 2020 to 2024 at a secondary referral hospital in Malawi revealed a consistently high number of expired red blood cell units. This quality improvement project (QIP) was implemented to reduce blood unit wastage from over 4% to zero of the total blood units received per month.We developed an intervention package to address gaps in blood bank inventory stock management. The package comprised change ideas such as adjusted blood ordering mechanism, strict adherence to the First Expire First Out (FEFO) strategy, improved coordination and staff coverage for the blood bank. The iterative Plan-Do-Study-Adjust (PDSA) cycle guided the implementation of the change ideas. Key outcomes from the pre-intervention and post-intervention phases were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.Overall, five PDSA cycles were completed in the implementation phase. Baseline assessment uncovered multiple non-conforming practices, including non-adherence to standard methods for issuing blood cell units and over-ordering of blood units, a practice driven by long distance and transport logistical challenges. The mean expiry rate of blood units for the pre-intervention period (March-July 2024) was 4.16% (37/890 units), with March recording the highest wastage (5.4%). Following implementation of QIP strategies, a significant decline in wastage of blood units was observed (1% (6/520), p=0.007), with zero-unit expiries recorded from September 2024 to March 2025. The proportion of ward returned blood units declined from 1.1% (8 of 713) to 0.7% (4 of 570) (p=0.45).Our QIP identified and addressed operational gaps contributing to blood unit wastage. Through a step-by-step implementation of a multifaceted strategy, to improve staff coverage, coordination and compliance with blood bank standard practices, blood unit wastage due to expiry was reduced to zero.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2026-004290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor blood bank stock management can result in excess or understocking of blood units for transfusion. A retrospective analysis of blood bank records from 2020 to 2024 at a secondary referral hospital in Malawi revealed a consistently high number of expired red blood cell units. This quality improvement project (QIP) was implemented to reduce blood unit wastage from over 4% to zero of the total blood units received per month.We developed an intervention package to address gaps in blood bank inventory stock management. The package comprised change ideas such as adjusted blood ordering mechanism, strict adherence to the First Expire First Out (FEFO) strategy, improved coordination and staff coverage for the blood bank. The iterative Plan-Do-Study-Adjust (PDSA) cycle guided the implementation of the change ideas. Key outcomes from the pre-intervention and post-intervention phases were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.Overall, five PDSA cycles were completed in the implementation phase. Baseline assessment uncovered multiple non-conforming practices, including non-adherence to standard methods for issuing blood cell units and over-ordering of blood units, a practice driven by long distance and transport logistical challenges. The mean expiry rate of blood units for the pre-intervention period (March-July 2024) was 4.16% (37/890 units), with March recording the highest wastage (5.4%). Following implementation of QIP strategies, a significant decline in wastage of blood units was observed (1% (6/520), p=0.007), with zero-unit expiries recorded from September 2024 to March 2025. The proportion of ward returned blood units declined from 1.1% (8 of 713) to 0.7% (4 of 570) (p=0.45).Our QIP identified and addressed operational gaps contributing to blood unit wastage. Through a step-by-step implementation of a multifaceted strategy, to improve staff coverage, coordination and compliance with blood bank standard practices, blood unit wastage due to expiry was reduced to zero.

马拉维二级转诊医院减少红细胞单位浪费的质量改进项目。
血库库存管理不善可能导致输血用血单位库存过剩或不足。对马拉维一家二级转诊医院2020年至2024年血库记录的回顾性分析显示,过期红细胞单位的数量一直很高。实施这一质量改进项目(QIP)是为了将每月收到的血液总量的4%以上的血液单位浪费减少到零。我们制定了一套干预方案,以解决血库库存管理方面的差距。一揽子改革方案包括调整血液订购机制、严格遵守先过期先出(FEFO)战略、改善血库的协调和工作人员覆盖范围等改革思路。迭代的计划-执行-研究-调整(PDSA)循环指导了变更思想的实施。对干预前和干预后阶段的主要结果进行比较,以评估干预的有效性。总体而言,在执行阶段完成了五个PDSA周期。基线评估发现了多种不符合标准的做法,包括不遵守发放血细胞单位的标准方法和过度订购血液单位,这种做法是由长途运输和物流挑战造成的。干预前(2024年3月- 7月)血液单位平均过期率为4.16%(37/890单位),其中3月浪费率最高(5.4%)。实施QIP策略后,观察到血液单位浪费显著下降(1% (6/520),p=0.007),从2024年9月到2025年3月,零单位过期记录。病房回血单位比例由1.1%(713 / 8)下降至0.7% (570 / 4)(p=0.45)。我们的质量保证计划(QIP)识别并解决了导致血液单位浪费的操作缺口。通过逐步实施一项多方面的战略,以改善工作人员的覆盖面、协调和遵守血库的标准做法,由于过期而造成的血液单位浪费减少到零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书