CardioBrain: a novel user-friendly software for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation-implementation validation and robustness to signal artefacts.

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Rhenan Bartels, Gabriel Dias Rodrigues, Tiago Peçanha
{"title":"CardioBrain: a novel user-friendly software for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation-implementation validation and robustness to signal artefacts.","authors":"Rhenan Bartels, Gabriel Dias Rodrigues, Tiago Peçanha","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/aea7a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is a critical mechanism that protects the brain against ischemia and hyperperfusion by maintaining cerebral blood flow (CBF) relatively stable despite fluctuations in arterial blood pressure (ABP). Alterations in CA are linked to adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for reliable analysis methods. This study aimed to present<i>CardioBrain</i>, a free and user-friendly software for assessing dynamic CA (dCA) using transfer function analysis (TFA) of continuously recorded ABP and CBF velocity (CBFv) data, validate its TFA implementation, and evaluate its robustness to simulated signal artefacts and artefact filtering. CardioBrain calculates TFA-derived dCA metrics, including gain, phase, and coherence, across frequency bands (VLF, LF, HF), and allows users to adjust signal-processing parameters following standards recommended by the Cerebrovascular Research Network (CARNet). Validation of the software's TFA implementation was performed by assessing agreement between<i>CardioBrain</i>and the TFA function provided on CARNet's website (<i>tfa_car</i>) using 18 ABP and CBFv signals. Robustness was assessed following the introduction of increasing levels of simulated signal artefacts (1%-5%), with and without Hampel filtering. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between CardioBrain and tfa_car for coherence, gain (cm·s<sup>-1</sup>·mmHg<sup>-1</sup>), and phase (degrees), with mean differences (LoA) indicating negligible errors: VLF<sub>coherence</sub>=-0.00(-0.000067-0.000054), VLF<sub>gain</sub>=-0.00(-0.000067-0.000066), VLF<sub>phase</sub>=-0.00(-0.000066-0.000053), LF<sub>coherence</sub>=-0.00(-0.000063-0.000069), LF<sub>gain</sub>=-0.00(-0.000061-0.000041), LF<sub>phase</sub>=0.00(-0.000059-0.000069), HF<sub>coherence</sub>=-0.00(-0.000058-0.000036), HF<sub>gain</sub>=-0.00(-0.00007-0.000063), HF<sub>phase</sub>= - 0.00(-0.000044-0.000029). Increasing artefact contamination, particularly from 2% onwards, resulted in greater bias and variability in TFA estimates, which were generally attenuated by Hampel filtering. This study presents<i>CardioBrain</i>as a user-friendly software tool for dCA assessment using TFA and demonstrates excellent agreement with an established TFA implementation. Robustness analyses demonstrate the impact of signal artefacts on TFA estimates and the potential of Hampel filtering to mitigate these effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aea7a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is a critical mechanism that protects the brain against ischemia and hyperperfusion by maintaining cerebral blood flow (CBF) relatively stable despite fluctuations in arterial blood pressure (ABP). Alterations in CA are linked to adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for reliable analysis methods. This study aimed to presentCardioBrain, a free and user-friendly software for assessing dynamic CA (dCA) using transfer function analysis (TFA) of continuously recorded ABP and CBF velocity (CBFv) data, validate its TFA implementation, and evaluate its robustness to simulated signal artefacts and artefact filtering. CardioBrain calculates TFA-derived dCA metrics, including gain, phase, and coherence, across frequency bands (VLF, LF, HF), and allows users to adjust signal-processing parameters following standards recommended by the Cerebrovascular Research Network (CARNet). Validation of the software's TFA implementation was performed by assessing agreement betweenCardioBrainand the TFA function provided on CARNet's website (tfa_car) using 18 ABP and CBFv signals. Robustness was assessed following the introduction of increasing levels of simulated signal artefacts (1%-5%), with and without Hampel filtering. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between CardioBrain and tfa_car for coherence, gain (cm·s-1·mmHg-1), and phase (degrees), with mean differences (LoA) indicating negligible errors: VLFcoherence=-0.00(-0.000067-0.000054), VLFgain=-0.00(-0.000067-0.000066), VLFphase=-0.00(-0.000066-0.000053), LFcoherence=-0.00(-0.000063-0.000069), LFgain=-0.00(-0.000061-0.000041), LFphase=0.00(-0.000059-0.000069), HFcoherence=-0.00(-0.000058-0.000036), HFgain=-0.00(-0.00007-0.000063), HFphase= - 0.00(-0.000044-0.000029). Increasing artefact contamination, particularly from 2% onwards, resulted in greater bias and variability in TFA estimates, which were generally attenuated by Hampel filtering. This study presentsCardioBrainas a user-friendly software tool for dCA assessment using TFA and demonstrates excellent agreement with an established TFA implementation. Robustness analyses demonstrate the impact of signal artefacts on TFA estimates and the potential of Hampel filtering to mitigate these effects.

CardioBrain:一种新颖的用户友好软件,用于评估动态大脑自动调节-实现验证和信号伪像的鲁棒性。
目的:脑自动调节(CA)是在动脉血压(ABP)波动的情况下维持脑血流量(CBF)相对稳定,从而保护大脑免受缺血和高灌注的重要机制。CA的改变与不良结果有关,因此需要可靠的分析方法。本研究旨在介绍CardioBrain,一个免费且用户友好的软件,用于使用连续记录的ABP和CBF速度(CBFv)数据的传递函数分析(TFA)来评估动态CA (dCA)。我们还对TFA的实现进行了验证,并评估了软件对模拟信号伪像和伪像滤波的鲁棒性。方法:软件计算dCA指标,包括跨频段(VLF、LF、HF)的增益、相位和相干性。CardioBrain允许用户根据脑血管研究网络(CARNet)推荐的标准调整信号处理参数。通过使用18个ABP和CBFv信号评估CardioBrain和CARNet网站(tfa_car)上提供的TFA功能之间的一致性来验证软件的TFA实现。结果:Bland-Altman分析显示CardioBrain和tfa_car在相干性、增益(cm·s⁻¹·mmHg毒血症)和相位(度)方面非常一致,平均差异(LoA)表明误差可以忽略不计:VLFcoherence=-0.00(-0.000067 ~ 0.000054), VLFgain=-0.00(-0.000067 ~ 0.000066), VLFphase=-0.00(-0.000066 ~ 0.000053), LFcoherence=-0.00(-0.000063 ~ 0.000069), LFgain=-0.00(-0.000061 ~ 0.000041), LFphase= 0.00(-0.000059 ~ 0.000069), HFcoherence=-0.00(-0.000058 ~ 0.000036), HFgain=-0.00(-0.00007 ~ 0.000063), HFphase =-0.00(0.000044 ~ 0.000029)。人工污染的增加,特别是从2%开始,导致TFA估计的偏差和变异性更大,这通常通过Hampel滤波来减弱。结论:本研究将CardioBrain作为使用TFA进行dCA评估的用户友好软件工具,并与已建立的TFA实施证明了良好的一致性。鲁棒性分析证明了信号伪影对TFA估计的影响,以及Hampel滤波减轻这些影响的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书