Development and psychometric validation of the hospital Security Personnel Narrative Competency Scale (HSPNCS).

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Binru Fang, Lina Guo, Hao Zhang, Yongting Yang, Rong Wu, Jin Wu, Shunjie Jiang, Liming Zhu
{"title":"Development and psychometric validation of the hospital Security Personnel Narrative Competency Scale (HSPNCS).","authors":"Binru Fang, Lina Guo, Hao Zhang, Yongting Yang, Rong Wu, Jin Wu, Shunjie Jiang, Liming Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12913-026-15542-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital security personnel frequently interact with patients and families in emotionally complex and potentially conflict-prone situations. However, no specific instrument is available to assess narrative competency in this healthcare support workforce. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Hospital Security Personnel Narrative Competency Scale (HSPNCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study was conducted to develop and validate the HSPNCS. Scale development followed a theory-driven adaptation approach based on the classical conceptualization of narrative competence and previously validated instruments. The initial item pool was generated through literature review, narrative medicine and medical humanities frameworks, the Nominal Group Technique, content validity assessment, and adaptation to the work context of hospital security personnel. A cross-sectional survey was then conducted among 645 hospital security personnel from 17 hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, content validity assessment, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity assessment, and internal consistency reliability testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final HSPNCS consisted of 36 items organized into nine first-order subdomains nested within three higher-order dimensions: self-reflection, empathy, and professionalism. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.967 for the total scale and alpha coefficients ranging from 0.911 to 0.945 for the three higher-order dimensions. Content validity was acceptable, with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.972. Factor analyses supported the proposed multidimensional structure, and confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit. Composite reliability and average variance extracted values also supported the internal consistency and convergent validity of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HSPNCS demonstrated preliminary evidence of content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency among hospital security personnel. It may serve as a useful tool for assessing narrative competency and identifying training needs in this healthcare support workforce. Further studies using independent, multicenter, and culturally diverse samples are needed to confirm its factor structure, test-retest reliability, external validity, and responsiveness to training interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13579745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15542-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital security personnel frequently interact with patients and families in emotionally complex and potentially conflict-prone situations. However, no specific instrument is available to assess narrative competency in this healthcare support workforce. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Hospital Security Personnel Narrative Competency Scale (HSPNCS).

Methods: A methodological study was conducted to develop and validate the HSPNCS. Scale development followed a theory-driven adaptation approach based on the classical conceptualization of narrative competence and previously validated instruments. The initial item pool was generated through literature review, narrative medicine and medical humanities frameworks, the Nominal Group Technique, content validity assessment, and adaptation to the work context of hospital security personnel. A cross-sectional survey was then conducted among 645 hospital security personnel from 17 hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, content validity assessment, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity assessment, and internal consistency reliability testing.

Results: The final HSPNCS consisted of 36 items organized into nine first-order subdomains nested within three higher-order dimensions: self-reflection, empathy, and professionalism. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.967 for the total scale and alpha coefficients ranging from 0.911 to 0.945 for the three higher-order dimensions. Content validity was acceptable, with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.972. Factor analyses supported the proposed multidimensional structure, and confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit. Composite reliability and average variance extracted values also supported the internal consistency and convergent validity of the scale.

Conclusion: The HSPNCS demonstrated preliminary evidence of content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency among hospital security personnel. It may serve as a useful tool for assessing narrative competency and identifying training needs in this healthcare support workforce. Further studies using independent, multicenter, and culturally diverse samples are needed to confirm its factor structure, test-retest reliability, external validity, and responsiveness to training interventions.

医院保安人员叙事能力量表(HSPNCS)的编制与心理测量学验证。
背景:医院保安人员经常在情绪复杂和可能容易发生冲突的情况下与患者和家属互动。然而,没有特定的工具可用于评估这一医疗保健支持工作人员的叙述能力。本研究旨在编制医院保安人员叙事能力量表,并进行心理计量学上的验证。方法:采用方法学研究方法对HSPNCS进行开发和验证。量表的发展遵循了一种理论驱动的适应方法,该方法基于叙事能力的经典概念化和先前经过验证的工具。通过文献回顾、叙事医学和医学人文框架、名义团体技术、内容效度评估和适应医院保安人员的工作环境,产生了初始项目库。然后对浙江省17家医院的645名医院保安人员进行了横断面调查。心理测量评估包括项目分析、内容效度评估、探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析、收敛效度评估和内部一致性信度测试。结果:最终的HSPNCS由36个项目组成,分为9个一阶子域,嵌套在三个高阶维度中:自我反思、共情和专业精神。量表具有良好的内部一致性,总量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.967,三个高阶维度的alpha系数在0.911 ~ 0.945之间。内容效度可接受,S-CVI/Ave为0.972。因子分析支持提出的多维结构,验证性因子分析表明模型拟合可接受。复合信度和平均方差提取值也支持量表的内部一致性和收敛效度。结论:HSPNCS在医院保安人员中具有内容效度、结构效度、收敛效度和内部一致性的初步证据。它可以作为一种有用的工具,用于评估叙事能力和确定医疗保健支持工作人员的培训需求。进一步的研究需要使用独立的、多中心的、多元文化的样本来证实其因素结构、重测信度、外部效度和对训练干预的反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书