Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Peyronie Disease (Induratio Penis Plastica): An American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC).

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Diane C Ling, Sevann Helo, Suzanne Russo, Leo Doumanian, Andrea M Harrow, Samuel Jean-Baptiste, Austin N Kirschner, Bobby Koneru, Christien Kluwe, Neil Newman, Kevin Pearlstein, Yasamin Sharifzadeh, Rahul Tendulkar, Austin Dove
{"title":"Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Peyronie Disease (Induratio Penis Plastica): An American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC).","authors":"Diane C Ling, Sevann Helo, Suzanne Russo, Leo Doumanian, Andrea M Harrow, Samuel Jean-Baptiste, Austin N Kirschner, Bobby Koneru, Christien Kluwe, Neil Newman, Kevin Pearlstein, Yasamin Sharifzadeh, Rahul Tendulkar, Austin Dove","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To critically analyze the current evidence for the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of Peyronie Disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was designed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing and Study Design (PICOTS) framework and was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA methodology. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective studies published between January 1, 1970 and June 24, 2026. Clinical variant cases were developed as examples to illustrate practical applications of consensus recommendations. RAND-UCLA consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence to support the use of radiotherapy treatment of PD is limited by poor quality evidence, which is based on older studies, heterogenous patient cohorts, inconsistent radiation dose fractionation schedules, and lack of objective measurable outcomes and long-term follow-up. Data suggests that radiotherapy may result in faster resolution of pain for patients with acute-phase PD; however, this observation does not take into account the possibility that any improvement may be due to the natural disease course as some patients experience spontaneous symptom resolution. Radiotherapy is not useful in the treatment of erectile dysfunction or penile deformity or in chronic-phase PD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current literature contains insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of RT for the treatment of PD. RT for treatment of PD should not be considered outside of a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To critically analyze the current evidence for the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of Peyronie Disease (PD).

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was designed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing and Study Design (PICOTS) framework and was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA methodology. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective studies published between January 1, 1970 and June 24, 2026. Clinical variant cases were developed as examples to illustrate practical applications of consensus recommendations. RAND-UCLA consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options.

Results: Evidence to support the use of radiotherapy treatment of PD is limited by poor quality evidence, which is based on older studies, heterogenous patient cohorts, inconsistent radiation dose fractionation schedules, and lack of objective measurable outcomes and long-term follow-up. Data suggests that radiotherapy may result in faster resolution of pain for patients with acute-phase PD; however, this observation does not take into account the possibility that any improvement may be due to the natural disease course as some patients experience spontaneous symptom resolution. Radiotherapy is not useful in the treatment of erectile dysfunction or penile deformity or in chronic-phase PD.

Conclusions: Current literature contains insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of RT for the treatment of PD. RT for treatment of PD should not be considered outside of a clinical trial.

放疗治疗阴茎硬化病:美国镭学会(ARS)适当使用标准(AUC)。
目的:批判性地分析目前放疗治疗佩罗尼病(PD)的证据。方法:采用人群、干预、比较器、结果、时间和研究设计(PICOTS)框架设计文献系统综述,并采用Cochrane和PRISMA方法进行评估。符合条件的研究包括发表于1970年1月1日至2026年6月24日的前瞻性和回顾性研究。临床变异病例被开发为例子,以说明共识建议的实际应用。采用RAND-UCLA共识法(修正德尔菲法)评价治疗方案的适宜性。结果:支持使用放疗治疗PD的证据受到证据质量差的限制,这些证据基于较早的研究,患者队列异质性,辐射剂量分割时间表不一致,缺乏客观可测量的结果和长期随访。数据表明,放疗可能导致急性期PD患者疼痛更快缓解;然而,这一观察并没有考虑到任何改善可能是由于自然病程的可能性,因为一些患者经历了自发的症状消退。放疗对治疗勃起功能障碍、阴茎畸形或慢性PD无效。结论:目前的文献没有足够的证据来推荐常规使用RT治疗PD。RT治疗PD不应该被认为是临床试验之外的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书