Honoring Children's Communication Rights: Listening to the Perspectives of Children Who Stutter Using Drawings, Self-Report Measures, and Interviews.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Mary-Pat O'Malley, Síafra Conroy, Clare Carroll
{"title":"Honoring Children's Communication Rights: Listening to the Perspectives of Children Who Stutter Using Drawings, Self-Report Measures, and Interviews.","authors":"Mary-Pat O'Malley, Síafra Conroy, Clare Carroll","doi":"10.1044/2026_LSHSS-25-00216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reflecting a commitment to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), and Articles 12 (respect for children's views) and Article 13 (sharing thoughts freely) in particular, this study aimed to explore whether drawings with interviews are a suitable method for understanding the perspectives of children who stutter (CWS) and what CWS communicate about their talking using this method.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected with 16 children aged 4;0 (years;months)-6;10 and involved drawings (62), interviews, and three self-report measures. The drawings were analyzed quantitatively across two dimensions: (a) developmental analysis and (b) focal point analysis. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-report measure scores indicated that most participants were \"happy\" about their talking with an average self-perception of little/no difficulty when talking. Participants demonstrated developmentally age-appropriate drawing skills. Six focal points were identified across the 62 drawings: (1) facial expressions, (2) accentuation of body features, (3) portrayal of talking/listening, (4) colors used, (5) conversation partners, and (6) sense of self. Four themes were generated: (1) familial relationships, (2) friendship, (3) child's interests, and (4) self-perception of competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Drawing with an interview is a suitable method for understanding the perspectives of CWS. A range of perspectives were expressed by the children. Stuttering was not found to be a prominent feature of children's perspectives on their talking. These findings contribute to the adoption of holistic, person-centered approaches when working with CWS in speech-language pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_LSHSS-25-00216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Reflecting a commitment to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), and Articles 12 (respect for children's views) and Article 13 (sharing thoughts freely) in particular, this study aimed to explore whether drawings with interviews are a suitable method for understanding the perspectives of children who stutter (CWS) and what CWS communicate about their talking using this method.

Method: Data were collected with 16 children aged 4;0 (years;months)-6;10 and involved drawings (62), interviews, and three self-report measures. The drawings were analyzed quantitatively across two dimensions: (a) developmental analysis and (b) focal point analysis. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was also conducted.

Results: Self-report measure scores indicated that most participants were "happy" about their talking with an average self-perception of little/no difficulty when talking. Participants demonstrated developmentally age-appropriate drawing skills. Six focal points were identified across the 62 drawings: (1) facial expressions, (2) accentuation of body features, (3) portrayal of talking/listening, (4) colors used, (5) conversation partners, and (6) sense of self. Four themes were generated: (1) familial relationships, (2) friendship, (3) child's interests, and (4) self-perception of competence.

Conclusions: Drawing with an interview is a suitable method for understanding the perspectives of CWS. A range of perspectives were expressed by the children. Stuttering was not found to be a prominent feature of children's perspectives on their talking. These findings contribute to the adoption of holistic, person-centered approaches when working with CWS in speech-language pathology.

尊重儿童的沟通权利:用图画、自我报告和访谈倾听口吃儿童的观点。
目的:本研究反映了对《儿童权利公约》(CRC)的承诺,特别是第12条(尊重儿童的观点)和第13条(自由分享思想),旨在探讨带有访谈的绘画是否是一种合适的方法,以了解口吃儿童(CWS)的观点,以及CWS使用这种方法传达的谈话内容。方法:收集16例4岁儿童资料;0(年,月)6;10和涉及图纸(62),访谈,和三个自我报告的措施。对这些图纸进行了两个维度的定量分析:(a)发育分析和(b)焦点分析。并对访谈笔录进行归纳反身主题分析。结果:自我报告测试得分表明,大多数参与者对自己的谈话感到“快乐”,平均自我感觉谈话时很少或没有困难。参与者展示了与发育年龄相适应的绘画技能。在62幅画中确定了六个焦点:(1)面部表情,(2)身体特征的强调,(3)说话/倾听的描绘,(4)使用的颜色,(5)对话伙伴,(6)自我意识。产生了四个主题:(1)家庭关系,(2)友谊,(3)孩子的兴趣,(4)自我能力感知。结论:绘画与访谈是一种适合理解CWS视角的方法。孩子们表达了一系列的观点。研究发现,口吃并不是儿童说话观点的一个突出特征。这些发现有助于采用整体的、以人为中心的方法来处理言语语言病理学中的CWS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书