GPT-assisted radiomic modeling for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
{"title":"GPT-assisted radiomic modeling for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Huaxian Shi, Tianjun Lan, Xiaoling Gao, Hanxiao Song, Ying Li, Yu Wang, Lingjie Yang, Xiaohua Ban, Xi Zhong, Chaobin Pan, Xiaohui Duan, Yu Peng, Zhaoyu Lin, Dong Zeng","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/aea735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To evaluate whether GPT can assist in automating radiomics modeling for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.<i>Methods.</i>The study included a training cohort (TC;<i>n</i>= 186), a validation cohort (VC;<i>n</i>= 116), and a prospective multicenter validation cohort (PVC;<i>n</i>= 269). Radiomic and supervised deep learning features were extracted from pretreatment T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. logistic regression (LR) was first evaluated using radiomic, deep learning, and fused features. Support vector machine, naïve Bayes, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting models were subsequently compared using fused features. GPT was not used as the classifier but assisted with preprocessing, feature selection, hyperparameter optimization, code generation and execution, model training, and probability output. Each GPT-assisted workflow was independently repeated five times.<i>Results.</i>Fused features achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both manually developed and GPT-assisted LR models. Their AUCs were 0.759 versus 0.763 ± 0.003 in the TC, 0.714 versus 0.741 ± 0.008 in the VC, and 0.700 versus 0.706 ± 0.004 in the PVC. Across five classifiers, GPT-assisted workflows achieved performance broadly comparable to manually developed models. Repeated GPT-assisted runs showed limited variability, with AUC standard deviations ranging from 0.001 to 0.019.<i>Conclusion.</i>Under expert supervision, GPT can automate key radiomics modeling procedures while achieving performance comparable to conventional machine learning workflows, potentially reducing technical workload and facilitating integrated model development.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aea735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate whether GPT can assist in automating radiomics modeling for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Methods.The study included a training cohort (TC;n= 186), a validation cohort (VC;n= 116), and a prospective multicenter validation cohort (PVC;n= 269). Radiomic and supervised deep learning features were extracted from pretreatment T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. logistic regression (LR) was first evaluated using radiomic, deep learning, and fused features. Support vector machine, naïve Bayes, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting models were subsequently compared using fused features. GPT was not used as the classifier but assisted with preprocessing, feature selection, hyperparameter optimization, code generation and execution, model training, and probability output. Each GPT-assisted workflow was independently repeated five times.Results.Fused features achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both manually developed and GPT-assisted LR models. Their AUCs were 0.759 versus 0.763 ± 0.003 in the TC, 0.714 versus 0.741 ± 0.008 in the VC, and 0.700 versus 0.706 ± 0.004 in the PVC. Across five classifiers, GPT-assisted workflows achieved performance broadly comparable to manually developed models. Repeated GPT-assisted runs showed limited variability, with AUC standard deviations ranging from 0.001 to 0.019.Conclusion.Under expert supervision, GPT can automate key radiomics modeling procedures while achieving performance comparable to conventional machine learning workflows, potentially reducing technical workload and facilitating integrated model development.
目的:评价GPT是否有助于自动化放射组学模型预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗免疫治疗的病理完全反应(pCR)。方法:本研究包括训练队列(TC, n = 186)、验证队列(VC, n = 116)和前瞻性多中心验证队列(PVC, n = 269)。从预处理的t2加权MRI中提取放射学和监督深度学习特征。逻辑回归(LR)首先使用放射学、深度学习和融合特征进行评估。随后使用融合特征对支持向量机、naïve贝叶斯、随机森林和XGBoost模型进行比较。GPT不用作分类器,而是辅助预处理、特征选择、超参数优化、代码生成和执行、模型训练和概率输出。每个gpt辅助工作流程独立重复5次。结果:在人工开发和gpt辅助的LR模型中,融合特征获得了最高的AUC。TC的auc分别为0.759和0.763±0.003,VC的auc分别为0.714和0.741±0.008,PVC的auc分别为0.700和0.706±0.004。在五个分类器中,gpt辅助工作流实现的性能与手动开发的模型大致相当。重复的gpt辅助运行显示出有限的变异性,AUC标准差范围为0.001至0.019。结论:在专家的监督下,GPT可以自动化关键的放射组学建模过程,同时实现与传统机器学习工作流程相当的性能,潜在地减少技术工作量并促进集成模型开发。
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry