The Need for Integrated Treatment: Synergistic Aspects of Psychotherapy, Psychopharmacology, and Patient-Provider Dynamics in Clinical Practice.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Susan He, Yakov Shapiro
{"title":"The Need for Integrated Treatment: Synergistic Aspects of Psychotherapy, Psychopharmacology, and Patient-Provider Dynamics in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Susan He, Yakov Shapiro","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychiatry has long been considered a biopsychosocial discipline, but, in the age of evidence-based medicine, clinical care is becoming increasingly fragmented and manualized. We continue to separate \"biological\" and \"psychological\" modalities in spite of mounting evidence that psychotherapy has a direct impact on brain physiology, and that psychopharmacological treatments carry meaning that often determines its real-life effectiveness. Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) focus clinical attention on the patient's symptomatic presentation and functional capacity that define their generic DSM-5 diagnosis. Yet, understanding the person of our patients and their experience of the illness goes beyond static diagnostic labels and involves exploration of their unique subjective and relational dynamics. Therapeutic alliance, a major factor in the treatment outcome across both psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological modalities, has become increasingly marginalized as more psychiatrists shift toward single consultation practices, where the full scope of the relational meaning is largely lost. Conversely, the minority of practitioners who continue to offer psychotherapy are often less familiar with psychopharmacological modalities. Although psychopharmacology and psychotherapy are both clinically effective, their outcomes and cost-effectiveness are further enhanced when they are applied in tandem, in the context of a nurturing relationship with the treatment provider. Below, we examine the limitations of the current EBT paradigm and the evidence for an individualized integrated wellness model that relies on empirically supported principles of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"32 5","pages":"272-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychiatry has long been considered a biopsychosocial discipline, but, in the age of evidence-based medicine, clinical care is becoming increasingly fragmented and manualized. We continue to separate "biological" and "psychological" modalities in spite of mounting evidence that psychotherapy has a direct impact on brain physiology, and that psychopharmacological treatments carry meaning that often determines its real-life effectiveness. Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) focus clinical attention on the patient's symptomatic presentation and functional capacity that define their generic DSM-5 diagnosis. Yet, understanding the person of our patients and their experience of the illness goes beyond static diagnostic labels and involves exploration of their unique subjective and relational dynamics. Therapeutic alliance, a major factor in the treatment outcome across both psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological modalities, has become increasingly marginalized as more psychiatrists shift toward single consultation practices, where the full scope of the relational meaning is largely lost. Conversely, the minority of practitioners who continue to offer psychotherapy are often less familiar with psychopharmacological modalities. Although psychopharmacology and psychotherapy are both clinically effective, their outcomes and cost-effectiveness are further enhanced when they are applied in tandem, in the context of a nurturing relationship with the treatment provider. Below, we examine the limitations of the current EBT paradigm and the evidence for an individualized integrated wellness model that relies on empirically supported principles of care.

综合治疗的需要:心理治疗、精神药理学和临床实践中患者-提供者动态的协同方面。
精神病学长期以来被认为是一门生物心理社会学科,但是,在循证医学时代,临床护理正变得越来越碎片化和手工化。尽管越来越多的证据表明心理治疗对大脑生理学有直接影响,而且心理药理学治疗的意义往往决定了它在现实生活中的有效性,但我们仍然将“生物学”和“心理学”模式分开。循证治疗(ebt)将临床注意力集中在患者的症状表现和功能上,这些症状和功能定义了他们的通用DSM-5诊断。然而,了解我们的病人和他们对疾病的体验超越了静态的诊断标签,还涉及到对他们独特的主观和关系动态的探索。治疗联盟是影响心理治疗和精神药理学治疗结果的一个主要因素,随着越来越多的精神科医生转向单一的咨询实践,这种关系意义的全部范围在很大程度上失去了,治疗联盟已经越来越被边缘化。相反,少数继续提供心理治疗的从业人员往往不太熟悉精神药理学模式。虽然精神药理学和心理治疗在临床上都是有效的,但当它们在与治疗提供者培养关系的背景下同时应用时,它们的结果和成本效益会进一步提高。下面,我们将研究当前EBT模式的局限性,以及基于经验支持的护理原则的个性化综合健康模式的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书