Achieving clinical remission in moderate-to-severe asthma using inhaled triple therapy.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00054-2026
Giorgio Walter Canonica, Dave Singh, Alberto Papi, Guy Brusselle, Alessio Piraino, Laura Franzini, Andrea Vele, Gemzel Hernandez, Gwen Skloot, J Christian Virchow
{"title":"Achieving clinical remission in moderate-to-severe asthma using inhaled triple therapy.","authors":"Giorgio Walter Canonica, Dave Singh, Alberto Papi, Guy Brusselle, Alessio Piraino, Laura Franzini, Andrea Vele, Gemzel Hernandez, Gwen Skloot, J Christian Virchow","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00054-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing interest in evaluating the ability of treatments to deliver clinical remission in patients with asthma. We conducted <i>post hoc</i> analyses of TRIMARAN and TRIGGER, two clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination beclometasone dipropionate (BDP), formoterol fumarate (FF) and glycopyrronium (G) (TRIMARAN, 100/6/10 μg and TRIGGER 200/6/10 µg) with BDP/FF (100/6 µg and 200/6 µg, respectively).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical remission was defined as: no use of oral corticosteroids over 52 weeks, no occurrence of severe exacerbations over 52 weeks, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score <1.5 at weeks 26, 40 and 52, and pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s at week 52 equal to, or higher than, the baseline value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2291 patients included in these analyses, 598 (26.1%) met the clinical remission definition (<i>i.e.</i> met all criteria) at week 52: 315 (27.4%) in TRIMARAN and 283 (24.8%) in TRIGGER. The proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission was higher in the BDP/FF/G group than in the BDP/FF group in both studies (29.4% and 29.6% in TRIMARAN and TRIGGER, respectively, <i>versus</i> 25.4% and 20.0%), with the difference reaching statistical significance in TRIGGER (odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.29-2.23; p<0.001) and when data were pooled (29.5% <i>versus</i> 22.7%; 1.44, 1.19-1.73; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with asthma that was uncontrolled by an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (LABA) combination prior to study entry, a higher proportion achieved clinical remission by switching to inhaled triple therapy than by continuing ICS/LABA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13573224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00054-2026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in evaluating the ability of treatments to deliver clinical remission in patients with asthma. We conducted post hoc analyses of TRIMARAN and TRIGGER, two clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination beclometasone dipropionate (BDP), formoterol fumarate (FF) and glycopyrronium (G) (TRIMARAN, 100/6/10 μg and TRIGGER 200/6/10 µg) with BDP/FF (100/6 µg and 200/6 µg, respectively).

Methods: Clinical remission was defined as: no use of oral corticosteroids over 52 weeks, no occurrence of severe exacerbations over 52 weeks, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score <1.5 at weeks 26, 40 and 52, and pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s at week 52 equal to, or higher than, the baseline value.

Results: Of 2291 patients included in these analyses, 598 (26.1%) met the clinical remission definition (i.e. met all criteria) at week 52: 315 (27.4%) in TRIMARAN and 283 (24.8%) in TRIGGER. The proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission was higher in the BDP/FF/G group than in the BDP/FF group in both studies (29.4% and 29.6% in TRIMARAN and TRIGGER, respectively, versus 25.4% and 20.0%), with the difference reaching statistical significance in TRIGGER (odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.29-2.23; p<0.001) and when data were pooled (29.5% versus 22.7%; 1.44, 1.19-1.73; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Among patients with asthma that was uncontrolled by an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combination prior to study entry, a higher proportion achieved clinical remission by switching to inhaled triple therapy than by continuing ICS/LABA.

使用吸入三联疗法实现中重度哮喘的临床缓解。
背景:对哮喘患者临床缓解治疗能力的评估越来越引起人们的兴趣。我们对TRIMARAN和TRIGGER进行了事后分析,两项临床研究比较了二丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)、富马酸福莫特罗(FF)和甘溴铵(G) (TRIMARAN, 100/6/10 μg和TRIGGER 200/6/10 μg)与BDP/FF(分别为100/6 μg和200/6 μg)的固定剂量组合的疗效和安全性。方法:临床缓解定义为:52周内未使用口服皮质类固醇,52周内未发生严重恶化,哮喘控制问卷-5评分结果:纳入这些分析的2291例患者中,598例(26.1%)在第52周达到临床缓解定义(即满足所有标准):TRIMARAN组315例(27.4%),TRIGGER组283例(24.8%)。两项研究中,BDP/FF/G组获得临床缓解的患者比例均高于BDP/FF组(TRIMARAN和TRIGGER组分别为29.4%和29.6%,分别为25.4%和20.0%),其中TRIGGER组差异具有统计学意义(优势比1.70,95%可信区间1.29-2.23;比值比22.7%;1.44,1.19-1.73;结论:在研究开始前吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)/长效β2激动剂(LABA)联合治疗无法控制的哮喘患者中,切换到吸入三联治疗比继续使用ICS/LABA治疗获得临床缓解的比例更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书