Concordance of Flow Cytometry and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction for Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-Life Data Analysis.

IF 1.3
Hasan Fatih Çakmaklı, Nübar Mustafayeva, Klara Dalva, Rolf Köhler, Elif Ince, Talia İleri, Beyza Doğanay, Mehmet Ertem
{"title":"Concordance of Flow Cytometry and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction for Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-Life Data Analysis.","authors":"Hasan Fatih Çakmaklı, Nübar Mustafayeva, Klara Dalva, Rolf Köhler, Elif Ince, Talia İleri, Beyza Doğanay, Mehmet Ertem","doi":"10.4274/tjh.galenos.2026.98475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Measurable residual disease (MRD) is the cornerstone of risk-adapted therapy in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In Türkiye, MRD assessment relies on flow cytometry (FCM), whereas molecular MRD is not routinely available. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between an experienced FCM laboratory and an international EuroMRD reference real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) laboratory and its potential impact on treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients, materials and methods: </strong>In this real-world study, 85 paired bone marrow samples from 46 children with B-ALL were analyzed simultaneously for MRD by FCM and RQ-PCR. MRD positivity was defined as ≥1×10⁻⁴. Qualitative agreement was evaluated by concordance and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Diagnostic performance of FCM was evaluated using RQ-PCR as the reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative concordance between FCM and RQ-PCR was 87.1%, indicating moderate agreement (κ=0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.83). Concordance was 83% at the end of induction (EOI) (κ=0.58) and 93% at the end of consolidation (EOC) (κ=0.71). FCM showed excellent specificity (96.8%), but modest sensitivity (60.9%). Reliance on FCM alone would have altered MRD-guided treatment allocation in 17% of patients at EOI and 7% at EOC, mainly because of false-negative results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FCM-MRD performed in an experienced laboratory demonstrated moderate agreement with an international EuroMRD reference laboratory but failed to detect some RQ-PCR-MRD positivite cases, potentially affecting treatment decisions. These findings highlight the need for continuous quality assurance, national reference laboratories, dedicated MRD laboratory teams with long-term continuity, and complementary use of molecular MRD techniques alongside FCM to standardize MRD assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520821,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2026.98475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Measurable residual disease (MRD) is the cornerstone of risk-adapted therapy in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In Türkiye, MRD assessment relies on flow cytometry (FCM), whereas molecular MRD is not routinely available. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between an experienced FCM laboratory and an international EuroMRD reference real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) laboratory and its potential impact on treatment.

Patients, materials and methods: In this real-world study, 85 paired bone marrow samples from 46 children with B-ALL were analyzed simultaneously for MRD by FCM and RQ-PCR. MRD positivity was defined as ≥1×10⁻⁴. Qualitative agreement was evaluated by concordance and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Diagnostic performance of FCM was evaluated using RQ-PCR as the reference method.

Results: Qualitative concordance between FCM and RQ-PCR was 87.1%, indicating moderate agreement (κ=0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.83). Concordance was 83% at the end of induction (EOI) (κ=0.58) and 93% at the end of consolidation (EOC) (κ=0.71). FCM showed excellent specificity (96.8%), but modest sensitivity (60.9%). Reliance on FCM alone would have altered MRD-guided treatment allocation in 17% of patients at EOI and 7% at EOC, mainly because of false-negative results.

Conclusion: FCM-MRD performed in an experienced laboratory demonstrated moderate agreement with an international EuroMRD reference laboratory but failed to detect some RQ-PCR-MRD positivite cases, potentially affecting treatment decisions. These findings highlight the need for continuous quality assurance, national reference laboratories, dedicated MRD laboratory teams with long-term continuity, and complementary use of molecular MRD techniques alongside FCM to standardize MRD assessment.

流式细胞术和实时定量聚合酶链反应在儿童b细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病可测量残留疾病检测中的一致性:现实数据分析。
目的:可测量残留病(MRD)是儿童b细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)风险适应治疗的基石。在 rkiye中,MRD评估依赖于流式细胞术(FCM),而分子MRD不是常规可用的。我们旨在评估经验丰富的FCM实验室和国际EuroMRD参考实时定量聚合酶链反应(RQ-PCR)实验室之间的一致性及其对治疗的潜在影响。患者、材料和方法:在这项现实世界的研究中,来自46名B-ALL儿童的85对骨髓样本同时通过FCM和RQ-PCR进行MRD分析。MRD阳性定义为≥1×10⁻⁴。采用一致性和Cohen’s kappa系数评价定性一致性。以RQ-PCR作为参考方法评价FCM的诊断性能。结果:FCM与RQ-PCR的定性一致性为87.1%,一致性中等(κ=0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.83)。诱导期(EOI)和巩固期(EOC)的一致性分别为83% (κ=0.58)和93% (κ=0.71)。FCM具有良好的特异性(96.8%),但敏感性不高(60.9%)。单独依赖FCM会改变17%的EOI患者和7%的EOC患者的mrd指导治疗分配,主要是因为假阴性结果。结论:在经验丰富的实验室中进行的FCM-MRD与国际EuroMRD参考实验室显示出适度的一致性,但未能检测到一些RQ-PCR-MRD阳性病例,这可能影响治疗决策。这些发现强调需要持续的质量保证、国家参考实验室、长期持续的MRD实验室团队,以及分子MRD技术与FCM的互补使用,以标准化MRD评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书