Trace of the tracer: Techno-solutionism, surveillance and the ambivalent experiences of digital health in Türkiye's COVID-19 response.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2026-12-31 Epub Date: 2026-09-14 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2026.2728442
Zübeyde Demircioğlu, Ayşe Polat, Hüseyin Küçükali
{"title":"Trace of the tracer: Techno-solutionism, surveillance and the ambivalent experiences of digital health in Türkiye's COVID-19 response.","authors":"Zübeyde Demircioğlu, Ayşe Polat, Hüseyin Küçükali","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2026.2728442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines how digital health technologies were implemented in pandemic response, based on interviews and focus groups with frontline health workers in Türkiye. While the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of digital tools as essential solutions for crisis management, the findings reveal a more ambivalent reality.Digital systems improved coordination, replaced paper-based chaotic workflows, and enabled real-time data sharing. However, their effectiveness was constrained by infrastructural shortcomings, uneven digital skills, and misalignment with field conditions. Digitalisation also introduced new surveillance and performance monitoring, blurring professional boundaries and increasing bureaucratic burdens. Privacy concerns emerged as health workers used personal devices, while metric-driven oversight reduced their work to quantifiable outputs and obscured qualitative aspects of care. Furthermore, social inequalities, including limited digital literacy among older adults and the exclusion of migrants from official records, revealed the limits of technology-centred approaches and underscored the importance of human-centred interactions.This study argues that digital technologies function as socio-technical systems shaped by institutional structures, material resources, and practice. Türkiye's experience shows that digital tools can enhance coordination in public health emergencies when frontline experience, quality of care, and equity are prioritised. Otherwise, digitalisation risks reproducing the inefficiencies and inequalities it aims to resolve.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"2728442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2026.2728442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how digital health technologies were implemented in pandemic response, based on interviews and focus groups with frontline health workers in Türkiye. While the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of digital tools as essential solutions for crisis management, the findings reveal a more ambivalent reality.Digital systems improved coordination, replaced paper-based chaotic workflows, and enabled real-time data sharing. However, their effectiveness was constrained by infrastructural shortcomings, uneven digital skills, and misalignment with field conditions. Digitalisation also introduced new surveillance and performance monitoring, blurring professional boundaries and increasing bureaucratic burdens. Privacy concerns emerged as health workers used personal devices, while metric-driven oversight reduced their work to quantifiable outputs and obscured qualitative aspects of care. Furthermore, social inequalities, including limited digital literacy among older adults and the exclusion of migrants from official records, revealed the limits of technology-centred approaches and underscored the importance of human-centred interactions.This study argues that digital technologies function as socio-technical systems shaped by institutional structures, material resources, and practice. Türkiye's experience shows that digital tools can enhance coordination in public health emergencies when frontline experience, quality of care, and equity are prioritised. Otherwise, digitalisation risks reproducing the inefficiencies and inequalities it aims to resolve.

示踪剂的痕迹:技术解决方案主义、监测和数字卫生在刚果民主共和国COVID-19应对中的矛盾经验。
本研究基于对刚果民主共和国一线卫生工作者的访谈和焦点小组,探讨了数字卫生技术如何在大流行应对中实施。尽管2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了将数字工具作为危机管理基本解决方案的采用,但调查结果揭示了一个更加矛盾的现实。数字系统改善了协调,取代了基于纸张的混乱工作流程,并实现了实时数据共享。然而,它们的有效性受到基础设施不足、数字技术不均衡以及与现场条件不一致的限制。数字化还引入了新的监控和绩效监控,模糊了专业界限,增加了官僚负担。由于卫生工作者使用个人设备,出现了隐私问题,而以指标为导向的监督将他们的工作减少到可量化的产出,并模糊了护理的定性方面。此外,社会不平等现象,包括老年人数字素养有限以及移民被排除在官方记录之外,揭示了以技术为中心的方法的局限性,并强调了以人为中心的互动的重要性。本研究认为,数字技术是由制度结构、物质资源和实践形成的社会技术系统。trkiye的经验表明,当优先考虑一线经验、护理质量和公平性时,数字工具可以加强突发公共卫生事件中的协调。否则,数字化有可能再现其旨在解决的低效率和不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书