First United States Experience With Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation Using the FARAPOINT Catheter for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-13 DOI:10.1111/jce.70498
Jorge L Reyes, Rezwan Munshi, Collin Goebel, Venkat Tholakanahalli
{"title":"First United States Experience With Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation Using the FARAPOINT Catheter for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.","authors":"Jorge L Reyes, Rezwan Munshi, Collin Goebel, Venkat Tholakanahalli","doi":"10.1111/jce.70498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) after failed radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a clinical challenge. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is expanding to ventricular applications, but United States experience with focal pulsed-field-only catheters in VT is sparse, and pulsed-field platforms are not equivalent across manufacturers. Here we describe the first United States experience of FARAPOINT focal PFA in patients with refractory VT.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the FARAPOINT (Boston Scientific) focal PFA catheter at a single VA Health Care System between July 2025 and May 2026. All patients had drug-refractory sustained monomorphic VT. Median age was 77 years with a mix of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Six of ten had at least one prior failed catheter ablation. Acute non-inducibility was achieved in all nine patients who underwent formal post-ablation stimulation testing. No procedural complications occurred. Over a median follow-up of 95.5 days, sustained VT recurred in four of ten patients. No patient underwent repeat ablation, required mechanical circulatory support, or died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this initial United States experience, FARAPOINT was safe and acutely effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy within a high-risk cohort with refractory VT and prior failed ablations, including challenging substrates. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to expand these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"2409-2412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) after failed radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a clinical challenge. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is expanding to ventricular applications, but United States experience with focal pulsed-field-only catheters in VT is sparse, and pulsed-field platforms are not equivalent across manufacturers. Here we describe the first United States experience of FARAPOINT focal PFA in patients with refractory VT.

Methods and results: We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the FARAPOINT (Boston Scientific) focal PFA catheter at a single VA Health Care System between July 2025 and May 2026. All patients had drug-refractory sustained monomorphic VT. Median age was 77 years with a mix of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Six of ten had at least one prior failed catheter ablation. Acute non-inducibility was achieved in all nine patients who underwent formal post-ablation stimulation testing. No procedural complications occurred. Over a median follow-up of 95.5 days, sustained VT recurred in four of ten patients. No patient underwent repeat ablation, required mechanical circulatory support, or died.

Conclusions: In this initial United States experience, FARAPOINT was safe and acutely effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy within a high-risk cohort with refractory VT and prior failed ablations, including challenging substrates. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to expand these observations.

在美国首次使用farpoint导管进行局灶脉冲场消融治疗难治性室性心动过速。
背景:射频消融失败后药物难治性室性心动过速(VT)仍然是一个临床挑战。脉冲场消融(PFA)正在扩展到心室的应用,但美国在VT中使用仅聚焦脉冲场导管的经验很少,而且各制造商的脉冲场平台也不相同。在这里,我们描述了farpoint局灶PFA治疗难治性室性血栓患者的首次美国经验。方法和结果:我们回顾性分析了2025年7月至2026年5月在单一VA医疗保健系统使用farpoint(波士顿科学公司)局灶PFA导管进行室性血栓消融的连续10例患者。所有患者均有药物难治性持续性单形态室速。中位年龄为77岁,伴有缺血性和非缺血性心肌病。十分之六的患者至少有一次导管消融失败。所有接受消融后正式刺激试验的9例患者均达到急性非诱导性。无手术并发症发生。在中位95.5天的随访中,10名患者中有4名复发了持续性室速。没有患者接受重复消融、需要机械循环支持或死亡。结论:在美国的初步研究中,FARAPOINT对于难治性室性心动过速和既往消融失败的高危队列中缺血性心肌病患者(包括挑战性底物)是安全且急性有效的。有必要进行前瞻性多中心研究,以扩大这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书