Jorge L Reyes, Rezwan Munshi, Collin Goebel, Venkat Tholakanahalli
{"title":"First United States Experience With Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation Using the FARAPOINT Catheter for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.","authors":"Jorge L Reyes, Rezwan Munshi, Collin Goebel, Venkat Tholakanahalli","doi":"10.1111/jce.70498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) after failed radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a clinical challenge. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is expanding to ventricular applications, but United States experience with focal pulsed-field-only catheters in VT is sparse, and pulsed-field platforms are not equivalent across manufacturers. Here we describe the first United States experience of FARAPOINT focal PFA in patients with refractory VT.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the FARAPOINT (Boston Scientific) focal PFA catheter at a single VA Health Care System between July 2025 and May 2026. All patients had drug-refractory sustained monomorphic VT. Median age was 77 years with a mix of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Six of ten had at least one prior failed catheter ablation. Acute non-inducibility was achieved in all nine patients who underwent formal post-ablation stimulation testing. No procedural complications occurred. Over a median follow-up of 95.5 days, sustained VT recurred in four of ten patients. No patient underwent repeat ablation, required mechanical circulatory support, or died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this initial United States experience, FARAPOINT was safe and acutely effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy within a high-risk cohort with refractory VT and prior failed ablations, including challenging substrates. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to expand these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"2409-2412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) after failed radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a clinical challenge. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is expanding to ventricular applications, but United States experience with focal pulsed-field-only catheters in VT is sparse, and pulsed-field platforms are not equivalent across manufacturers. Here we describe the first United States experience of FARAPOINT focal PFA in patients with refractory VT.
Methods and results: We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the FARAPOINT (Boston Scientific) focal PFA catheter at a single VA Health Care System between July 2025 and May 2026. All patients had drug-refractory sustained monomorphic VT. Median age was 77 years with a mix of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Six of ten had at least one prior failed catheter ablation. Acute non-inducibility was achieved in all nine patients who underwent formal post-ablation stimulation testing. No procedural complications occurred. Over a median follow-up of 95.5 days, sustained VT recurred in four of ten patients. No patient underwent repeat ablation, required mechanical circulatory support, or died.
Conclusions: In this initial United States experience, FARAPOINT was safe and acutely effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy within a high-risk cohort with refractory VT and prior failed ablations, including challenging substrates. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to expand these observations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.