Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in partial and uncontrolled preschool asthma (TIPP): a phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2026-09-04 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104172
Stefan Zielen, Nadine Wollscheid, Tanja Nickolay, Caroline Grimmel, David Scheele, Franziska Sattler, Freerk Prenzel, Michael Lorenz, Bianca Schaub, Christiane Lex, Franziska Stieglitz, Jordis Trischler, Helena Donath, Susanne Lau, Eckard Hamelmann, Christian Vogelberg, Michael Gerstlauer, Ruth Grychtol, Ralf Schubert, Monika Gappa, Lukas Schollenberger, Julia Wosniok
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in partial and uncontrolled preschool asthma (TIPP): a phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Stefan Zielen, Nadine Wollscheid, Tanja Nickolay, Caroline Grimmel, David Scheele, Franziska Sattler, Freerk Prenzel, Michael Lorenz, Bianca Schaub, Christiane Lex, Franziska Stieglitz, Jordis Trischler, Helena Donath, Susanne Lau, Eckard Hamelmann, Christian Vogelberg, Michael Gerstlauer, Ruth Grychtol, Ralf Schubert, Monika Gappa, Lukas Schollenberger, Julia Wosniok","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preschool children with asthma are more susceptible to develop acute life-threatening respiratory distress leading to hospital admissions compared to school children and treatment options are limited for this age group. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of tiotropium as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in preschool children with high-risk, partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TIPP was a phase III, prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group (investigator-initiated) trial conducted at 13 German centres (12 hospitals, one specialised medical practice). Children aged 1-5 years with physician-diagnosed asthma, partly controlled or uncontrolled symptoms despite ICS, and a history of severe exacerbations were randomly assigned to receive once-daily tiotropium (two puffs of 1.25 μg) via Respimat® inhaler or placebo as add-on to ICS therapy over 52 weeks. The primary outcome was time to first severe asthma exacerbation requiring hospitalisation and/or systemic corticosteroid treatment. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and analysed by treatment received for safety. No primary or safety data were missing; therefore, no imputation was required. The study was registered in the \"EU Clinical Trials Registry\" (EudraCT 2021-000190-81).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between February 2022 and March 2025, 100 of the planned 204 children were enrolled, of whom 86 were randomised to tiotropium + ICS (n = 44) or placebo + ICS (n = 42). Mean age was 3.3 years (Standard deviation (SD) 1.3). The primary outcome time to first severe asthma exacerbation did not differ between groups (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-1.92; p = 0.98). At least one adverse event was reported in 41 (93%) of 44 children in the tiotropium + ICS group and 42 (100%) of 42 children in the placebo + ICS group. 397 adverse events were reported with tiotropium + ICS group and 450 with placebo + ICS group. Tiotropium was well tolerated, and no new safety signal was identified.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Tiotropium did not reduce the risk of a severe asthma exacerbation, but was well tolerated as add-on therapy to ICS in preschool children with high-risk asthma.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01KG2030); study medication provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (0205-0546).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"99 ","pages":"104172"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13571877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104172","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preschool children with asthma are more susceptible to develop acute life-threatening respiratory distress leading to hospital admissions compared to school children and treatment options are limited for this age group. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of tiotropium as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in preschool children with high-risk, partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma.

Methods: TIPP was a phase III, prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group (investigator-initiated) trial conducted at 13 German centres (12 hospitals, one specialised medical practice). Children aged 1-5 years with physician-diagnosed asthma, partly controlled or uncontrolled symptoms despite ICS, and a history of severe exacerbations were randomly assigned to receive once-daily tiotropium (two puffs of 1.25 μg) via Respimat® inhaler or placebo as add-on to ICS therapy over 52 weeks. The primary outcome was time to first severe asthma exacerbation requiring hospitalisation and/or systemic corticosteroid treatment. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and analysed by treatment received for safety. No primary or safety data were missing; therefore, no imputation was required. The study was registered in the "EU Clinical Trials Registry" (EudraCT 2021-000190-81).

Findings: Between February 2022 and March 2025, 100 of the planned 204 children were enrolled, of whom 86 were randomised to tiotropium + ICS (n = 44) or placebo + ICS (n = 42). Mean age was 3.3 years (Standard deviation (SD) 1.3). The primary outcome time to first severe asthma exacerbation did not differ between groups (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-1.92; p = 0.98). At least one adverse event was reported in 41 (93%) of 44 children in the tiotropium + ICS group and 42 (100%) of 42 children in the placebo + ICS group. 397 adverse events were reported with tiotropium + ICS group and 450 with placebo + ICS group. Tiotropium was well tolerated, and no new safety signal was identified.

Interpretation: Tiotropium did not reduce the risk of a severe asthma exacerbation, but was well tolerated as add-on therapy to ICS in preschool children with high-risk asthma.

Funding: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01KG2030); study medication provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (0205-0546).

噻托溴铵治疗部分和未控制学龄前哮喘(TIPP)的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的III期试验
背景:与学龄儿童相比,患有哮喘的学龄前儿童更容易发生危及生命的急性呼吸窘迫而导致住院,并且该年龄组的治疗选择有限。我们评估了噻托溴铵作为吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)治疗学龄前高危、部分控制或未控制哮喘儿童的附加治疗的安全性和有效性。方法:TIPP是一项III期、前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组(研究者发起)试验,在13个德国中心(12家医院,1家专业医疗实践)进行。年龄1-5岁,经医生诊断为哮喘的儿童,尽管有ICS,但症状部分控制或未控制,且有严重恶化史,随机分配通过Respimat®吸入器或安慰剂接受每日一次噻托溴铵(两次1.25 μg),作为ICS治疗的补充,持续52周。主要终点是首次严重哮喘恶化需要住院和/或全身皮质类固醇治疗的时间。所有随机受试者均纳入意向治疗分析,并根据所接受治疗的安全性进行分析。没有原始数据或安全数据缺失;因此,不需要归算。该研究已在“EU临床试验注册中心”注册(EudraCT 2021-000190-81)。研究结果:在2022年2月至2025年3月期间,计划的204名儿童中有100名入组,其中86名随机分配至噻托品+ ICS组(n = 44)或安慰剂+ ICS组(n = 42)。平均年龄3.3岁(标准差1.3)。主要结局时间到首次严重哮喘加重在两组间无差异(风险比(HR): 0.99, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.51-1.92;P = 0.98)。在噻托溴铵+ ICS组中,44名儿童中有41名(93%)报告了至少一次不良事件,而在安慰剂+ ICS组中,42名儿童中有42名(100%)报告了至少一次不良事件。噻托溴铵+ ICS组报告不良事件397例,安慰剂+ ICS组报告不良事件450例。噻托溴铵耐受性良好,未发现新的安全信号。结论:噻托溴铵不能降低严重哮喘发作的风险,但作为高风险哮喘学龄前儿童ICS的附加治疗耐受性良好。资助:德国联邦教育与研究部(01KG2030);勃林格殷格翰制药有限公司(0205-0546)提供的研究药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书