Fire resistance evaluation of clay and concrete masonry units under elevated temperatures using mechanical, chemical, and microstructural characterization techniques

Q2 Engineering
Chantal Mohammed, Alana Ramnarine, Daniel White, Jeffrey Smith, Rajiv Budhooram
{"title":"Fire resistance evaluation of clay and concrete masonry units under elevated temperatures using mechanical, chemical, and microstructural characterization techniques","authors":"Chantal Mohammed,&nbsp;Alana Ramnarine,&nbsp;Daniel White,&nbsp;Jeffrey Smith,&nbsp;Rajiv Budhooram","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01755-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Limited studies have directly compared the fire performance of clay and concrete masonry units using integrated mechanical, chemical, and microstructural characterization under identical elevated-temperature conditions. This study addressed this gap by exposing both materials to temperatures ranging from 50 °C to 1000 °C and evaluating their response using compressive and flexural strength testing, FTIR, SEM, BET surface area analysis, ion migration, and moisture retention measurements. Concrete masonry units exhibited significant thermal degradation, with compressive strength decreasing from 25.4 to 16 MPa, flexural strength reducing from 1.42 to 0.03 kN, surface area declining from 14.7 to 1.2 m²/g, and ion migration reaching 2.751 ppm. ANOVA confirmed a statistically significant temperature effect (F = 20.3, <i>p</i> = 8.18 × 10⁻⁷). In contrast, clay masonry units maintained stable compressive strength (18.8–21.07 MPa), showed minimal flexural variation (0.36–0.67 kN), lower ion migration (1.161 ppm), and negligible shrinkage (0.0–0.05%), while exhibiting sintering-induced densification at elevated temperatures. These results demonstrate that clay masonry units possess superior thermal stability and post-fire structural reliability compared to concrete masonry units, providing quantitative evidence to support fire-resilient material selection and sustainable post-fire reuse strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 10","pages":"5029 - 5037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01755-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited studies have directly compared the fire performance of clay and concrete masonry units using integrated mechanical, chemical, and microstructural characterization under identical elevated-temperature conditions. This study addressed this gap by exposing both materials to temperatures ranging from 50 °C to 1000 °C and evaluating their response using compressive and flexural strength testing, FTIR, SEM, BET surface area analysis, ion migration, and moisture retention measurements. Concrete masonry units exhibited significant thermal degradation, with compressive strength decreasing from 25.4 to 16 MPa, flexural strength reducing from 1.42 to 0.03 kN, surface area declining from 14.7 to 1.2 m²/g, and ion migration reaching 2.751 ppm. ANOVA confirmed a statistically significant temperature effect (F = 20.3, p = 8.18 × 10⁻⁷). In contrast, clay masonry units maintained stable compressive strength (18.8–21.07 MPa), showed minimal flexural variation (0.36–0.67 kN), lower ion migration (1.161 ppm), and negligible shrinkage (0.0–0.05%), while exhibiting sintering-induced densification at elevated temperatures. These results demonstrate that clay masonry units possess superior thermal stability and post-fire structural reliability compared to concrete masonry units, providing quantitative evidence to support fire-resilient material selection and sustainable post-fire reuse strategies.

使用机械、化学和微观结构表征技术对高温下粘土和混凝土砌体单元的耐火性能进行评估
有限的研究直接比较了粘土和混凝土砌体单元在相同高温条件下的防火性能,使用了综合力学、化学和微观结构表征。本研究通过将两种材料暴露在50°C至1000°C的温度下,并使用压缩和弯曲强度测试、FTIR、SEM、BET表面积分析、离子迁移和水分保持测量来评估其响应,从而解决了这一差距。混凝土砌体单元表现出明显的热降解,抗压强度从25.4 MPa降至16 MPa,抗折强度从1.42 kN降至0.03 kN,比表面积从14.7 m²/g降至1.2 m²/g,离子迁移量达到2.751 ppm。方差分析证实了统计上显著的温度效应(F = 20.3, p = 8.18 × 10⁻⁷)。相比之下,粘土砌体单元保持稳定的抗压强度(18.8-21.07 MPa),表现出最小的弯曲变化(0.36-0.67 kN),较低的离子迁移(1.161 ppm)和可忽略的收缩率(0.05% - 0.05%),但在高温下表现出烧结致密化。这些结果表明,与混凝土砌体单元相比,粘土砌体单元具有更好的热稳定性和火灾后结构可靠性,为耐火材料的选择和火灾后可持续再利用策略提供了定量证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书