Pinal C. Patel, Vijaykumar R. Panchal, Rupesh Kumar Tipu
{"title":"Risk-aware surrogate-assisted multi-objective design optimization of profiled steel-concrete composite slabs","authors":"Pinal C. Patel, Vijaykumar R. Panchal, Rupesh Kumar Tipu","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01757-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Profiled steel-concrete composite slabs require a balance among self-weight, service performance, and ultimate load resistance. Direct finite element (FE)-based optimization is computationally expensive because every candidate requires a nonlinear analysis. This study presents a risk-aware surrogate-assisted framework that incorporates calibrated prediction uncertainty directly into multi-objective optimization. An audited dataset of 5000 ANSYS design points was used to train XGBoost models for service deflection and steel-deck stress and heteroscedastic deep ensembles for ultimate capacity and concrete compressive strain. Calibration on held-out residuals produced uncertainty-adjusted screening bounds. NSGA-II used upper-bound predictions for service and strain constraints and a lower-bound prediction for the capacity objective. The service models achieved test <span>\\(R^2\\)</span> values of 0.974 for deflection and 0.970 for deck stress, while the ultimate-response models achieved values of 0.751 for capacity and 0.689 for concrete strain. Across 30 independent NSGA-II runs, the final normalized hypervolume was <span>\\(0.8940\\pm 0.0032\\)</span>, and 29 runs satisfied the adopted terminal-stability criterion. Mean-only optimization produced 66 of 200 candidates that failed the adopted surrogate-bound criteria after uncertainty-aware rechecking, whereas all 200 risk-aware candidates satisfied those criteria. An equal-weight closest-to-ideal rule selected solution RA-P088 as the representative compromise, with a mass of 723.4 kg, conservative deflection of 0.2394 mm, and conservative capacity of 326.48 kN. FE re-analysis of this candidate also satisfied the adopted screening limits. The framework supports rapid trade-off screening and targeted FE confirmation of shortlisted designs but does not replace project-specific structural verification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 10","pages":"5057 - 5080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01757-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Profiled steel-concrete composite slabs require a balance among self-weight, service performance, and ultimate load resistance. Direct finite element (FE)-based optimization is computationally expensive because every candidate requires a nonlinear analysis. This study presents a risk-aware surrogate-assisted framework that incorporates calibrated prediction uncertainty directly into multi-objective optimization. An audited dataset of 5000 ANSYS design points was used to train XGBoost models for service deflection and steel-deck stress and heteroscedastic deep ensembles for ultimate capacity and concrete compressive strain. Calibration on held-out residuals produced uncertainty-adjusted screening bounds. NSGA-II used upper-bound predictions for service and strain constraints and a lower-bound prediction for the capacity objective. The service models achieved test \(R^2\) values of 0.974 for deflection and 0.970 for deck stress, while the ultimate-response models achieved values of 0.751 for capacity and 0.689 for concrete strain. Across 30 independent NSGA-II runs, the final normalized hypervolume was \(0.8940\pm 0.0032\), and 29 runs satisfied the adopted terminal-stability criterion. Mean-only optimization produced 66 of 200 candidates that failed the adopted surrogate-bound criteria after uncertainty-aware rechecking, whereas all 200 risk-aware candidates satisfied those criteria. An equal-weight closest-to-ideal rule selected solution RA-P088 as the representative compromise, with a mass of 723.4 kg, conservative deflection of 0.2394 mm, and conservative capacity of 326.48 kN. FE re-analysis of this candidate also satisfied the adopted screening limits. The framework supports rapid trade-off screening and targeted FE confirmation of shortlisted designs but does not replace project-specific structural verification.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.