Risk-aware surrogate-assisted multi-objective design optimization of profiled steel-concrete composite slabs

Q2 Engineering
Pinal C. Patel, Vijaykumar R. Panchal, Rupesh Kumar Tipu
{"title":"Risk-aware surrogate-assisted multi-objective design optimization of profiled steel-concrete composite slabs","authors":"Pinal C. Patel,&nbsp;Vijaykumar R. Panchal,&nbsp;Rupesh Kumar Tipu","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01757-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Profiled steel-concrete composite slabs require a balance among self-weight, service performance, and ultimate load resistance. Direct finite element (FE)-based optimization is computationally expensive because every candidate requires a nonlinear analysis. This study presents a risk-aware surrogate-assisted framework that incorporates calibrated prediction uncertainty directly into multi-objective optimization. An audited dataset of 5000 ANSYS design points was used to train XGBoost models for service deflection and steel-deck stress and heteroscedastic deep ensembles for ultimate capacity and concrete compressive strain. Calibration on held-out residuals produced uncertainty-adjusted screening bounds. NSGA-II used upper-bound predictions for service and strain constraints and a lower-bound prediction for the capacity objective. The service models achieved test <span>\\(R^2\\)</span> values of 0.974 for deflection and 0.970 for deck stress, while the ultimate-response models achieved values of 0.751 for capacity and 0.689 for concrete strain. Across 30 independent NSGA-II runs, the final normalized hypervolume was <span>\\(0.8940\\pm 0.0032\\)</span>, and 29 runs satisfied the adopted terminal-stability criterion. Mean-only optimization produced 66 of 200 candidates that failed the adopted surrogate-bound criteria after uncertainty-aware rechecking, whereas all 200 risk-aware candidates satisfied those criteria. An equal-weight closest-to-ideal rule selected solution RA-P088 as the representative compromise, with a mass of 723.4 kg, conservative deflection of 0.2394 mm, and conservative capacity of 326.48 kN. FE re-analysis of this candidate also satisfied the adopted screening limits. The framework supports rapid trade-off screening and targeted FE confirmation of shortlisted designs but does not replace project-specific structural verification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 10","pages":"5057 - 5080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01757-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Profiled steel-concrete composite slabs require a balance among self-weight, service performance, and ultimate load resistance. Direct finite element (FE)-based optimization is computationally expensive because every candidate requires a nonlinear analysis. This study presents a risk-aware surrogate-assisted framework that incorporates calibrated prediction uncertainty directly into multi-objective optimization. An audited dataset of 5000 ANSYS design points was used to train XGBoost models for service deflection and steel-deck stress and heteroscedastic deep ensembles for ultimate capacity and concrete compressive strain. Calibration on held-out residuals produced uncertainty-adjusted screening bounds. NSGA-II used upper-bound predictions for service and strain constraints and a lower-bound prediction for the capacity objective. The service models achieved test \(R^2\) values of 0.974 for deflection and 0.970 for deck stress, while the ultimate-response models achieved values of 0.751 for capacity and 0.689 for concrete strain. Across 30 independent NSGA-II runs, the final normalized hypervolume was \(0.8940\pm 0.0032\), and 29 runs satisfied the adopted terminal-stability criterion. Mean-only optimization produced 66 of 200 candidates that failed the adopted surrogate-bound criteria after uncertainty-aware rechecking, whereas all 200 risk-aware candidates satisfied those criteria. An equal-weight closest-to-ideal rule selected solution RA-P088 as the representative compromise, with a mass of 723.4 kg, conservative deflection of 0.2394 mm, and conservative capacity of 326.48 kN. FE re-analysis of this candidate also satisfied the adopted screening limits. The framework supports rapid trade-off screening and targeted FE confirmation of shortlisted designs but does not replace project-specific structural verification.

风险感知代理辅助的型钢-混凝土组合板多目标设计优化
型钢-混凝土复合板要求在自重、使用性能和极限抗荷载之间取得平衡。直接基于有限元(FE)的优化是计算昂贵的,因为每个候选者都需要进行非线性分析。本研究提出了一个风险感知的代理辅助框架,将校准的预测不确定性直接纳入多目标优化。利用ANSYS 5000个设计点的审计数据集,对XGBoost模型进行了使用挠度和钢-甲板应力的训练,并对极限承载力和混凝土压应变的异方差深度组合进行了训练。残留校正产生不确定度调整筛选界限。NSGA-II对服务和应变约束使用上限预测,对容量目标使用下限预测。服务模型实现了测试 \(R^2\) 挠度计算值为0.974,桥面应力计算值为0.970,极限响应模型计算值为0.751,混凝土应变计算值为0.689。在30次独立的NSGA-II运行中,最终的规范化超容积为 \(0.8940\pm 0.0032\),有29次运行满足所采用的末端稳定判据。在不确定性意识的重新检查后,仅均值优化产生了200个候选中66个未能通过所采用的代理约束标准,而所有200个具有风险意识的候选都满足这些标准。等重最接近理想规则选择RA-P088溶液作为代表性妥协方案,其质量为723.4 kg,保守挠度为0.2394 mm,保守容量为326.48 kN。该候选物的FE再分析也满足所采用的筛选限度。该框架支持快速权衡筛选和入围设计的目标FE确认,但不能取代项目特定的结构验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书