Joyce Kuo BS, Alice Jiang BA, Yi Peng Wang BS, Amy Ladd MD, Catherine Curtin MD, Jeffrey Yao MD, Sarah S. Donaldson MD, Susan M. Hiniker MD, Justin Oh MD
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes After Radiation Therapy for Dupuytren’s Contracture","authors":"Joyce Kuo BS, Alice Jiang BA, Yi Peng Wang BS, Amy Ladd MD, Catherine Curtin MD, Jeffrey Yao MD, Sarah S. Donaldson MD, Susan M. Hiniker MD, Justin Oh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2026.102161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) is a fibroproliferative disorder that can result in functional impairment of the hand. Radiation therapy (RT) is used to prevent disease progression and sometimes as adjuvant therapy after surgeries and recurrences. However, comprehensive data on patient-reported efficacy are limited. This study aimed to assess patient-reported outcomes in patients with DC treated with primary and adjuvant RT.</div></div><div>Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) is a fibroproliferative disorder that can result in functional impairment of the hand. Radiation therapy (RT) is used to prevent disease progression and sometimes as adjuvant therapy after surgeries and recurrences. However, comprehensive data on patient-reported efficacy are limited. This study aimed to assess patient-reported outcomes in patients with DC treated with primary and adjuvant RT.</div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A single-institution retrospective study was conducted, including 22 patients treated with RT for DC between April 2017 and July 2022. Surveys to assess satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and treatment burden used Likert scales and the post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme. All patients received either 30 Gy in a split course or 21 Gy in continuous daily treatments.</div></div><div>A single-institution retrospective study was conducted, including 22 patients treated with RT for DC between April 2017 and July 2022. Surveys to assess satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and treatment burden used Likert scales and the post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme. All patients received either 30 Gy in a split course or 21 Gy in continuous daily treatments.</div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median follow-up was 4.3 years, and median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Sixty-three percent had undergone fasciectomy before RT. Seventy-seven percent expressed satisfaction with RT outcomes, and 68% perceived it as effective. Median post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme score was 5 (IQR, 4-6), indicating mild functional limitations. Four patients (18%) experienced new nodules or cords, and only 1 patient (4.5%) required further surgery. Thirteen patients (59%) reported side effects from RT, most commonly mild dry skin. One patient developed severe dry skin, but there were no other severe toxicities or malignancies observed.</div></div><div>Median follow-up was 4.3 years, and median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Sixty-three percent had undergone fasciectomy before RT. Seventy-seven percent expressed satisfaction with RT outcomes, and 68% perceived it as effective. Median post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme score was 5 (IQR, 4-6), indicating mild functional limitations. Four patients (18%) experienced new nodules or cords, and only 1 patient (4.5%) required further surgery. Thirteen patients (59%) reported side effects from RT, most commonly mild dry skin. One patient developed severe dry skin, but there were no other severe toxicities or malignancies observed.</div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RT for DC may be associated with high patient satisfaction and low toxicity. Although these findings are encouraging, they are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in prospective studies with larger cohorts and systematic pretreatment and posttreatment assessments.</div></div><div>RT for DC may be associated with high patient satisfaction and low toxicity. Although these findings are encouraging, they are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in prospective studies with larger cohorts and systematic pretreatment and posttreatment assessments.</div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"11 9","pages":"Article 102161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109426001685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) is a fibroproliferative disorder that can result in functional impairment of the hand. Radiation therapy (RT) is used to prevent disease progression and sometimes as adjuvant therapy after surgeries and recurrences. However, comprehensive data on patient-reported efficacy are limited. This study aimed to assess patient-reported outcomes in patients with DC treated with primary and adjuvant RT.
Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) is a fibroproliferative disorder that can result in functional impairment of the hand. Radiation therapy (RT) is used to prevent disease progression and sometimes as adjuvant therapy after surgeries and recurrences. However, comprehensive data on patient-reported efficacy are limited. This study aimed to assess patient-reported outcomes in patients with DC treated with primary and adjuvant RT.
Methods and Materials
A single-institution retrospective study was conducted, including 22 patients treated with RT for DC between April 2017 and July 2022. Surveys to assess satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and treatment burden used Likert scales and the post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme. All patients received either 30 Gy in a split course or 21 Gy in continuous daily treatments.
A single-institution retrospective study was conducted, including 22 patients treated with RT for DC between April 2017 and July 2022. Surveys to assess satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and treatment burden used Likert scales and the post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme. All patients received either 30 Gy in a split course or 21 Gy in continuous daily treatments.
Results
Median follow-up was 4.3 years, and median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Sixty-three percent had undergone fasciectomy before RT. Seventy-seven percent expressed satisfaction with RT outcomes, and 68% perceived it as effective. Median post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme score was 5 (IQR, 4-6), indicating mild functional limitations. Four patients (18%) experienced new nodules or cords, and only 1 patient (4.5%) required further surgery. Thirteen patients (59%) reported side effects from RT, most commonly mild dry skin. One patient developed severe dry skin, but there were no other severe toxicities or malignancies observed.
Median follow-up was 4.3 years, and median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Sixty-three percent had undergone fasciectomy before RT. Seventy-seven percent expressed satisfaction with RT outcomes, and 68% perceived it as effective. Median post-RT Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme score was 5 (IQR, 4-6), indicating mild functional limitations. Four patients (18%) experienced new nodules or cords, and only 1 patient (4.5%) required further surgery. Thirteen patients (59%) reported side effects from RT, most commonly mild dry skin. One patient developed severe dry skin, but there were no other severe toxicities or malignancies observed.
Conclusions
RT for DC may be associated with high patient satisfaction and low toxicity. Although these findings are encouraging, they are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in prospective studies with larger cohorts and systematic pretreatment and posttreatment assessments.
RT for DC may be associated with high patient satisfaction and low toxicity. Although these findings are encouraging, they are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in prospective studies with larger cohorts and systematic pretreatment and posttreatment assessments.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.