Inteligencia artificial en kinesiología: aplicaciones, oportunidades y barreras: una revisión narrativa

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.08.002
Dante Gil Z. PT, Andrés Giglio
{"title":"Inteligencia artificial en kinesiología: aplicaciones, oportunidades y barreras: una revisión narrativa","authors":"Dante Gil Z. PT,&nbsp;Andrés Giglio","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering routine kinesiology practice. This narrative review maps its current status across four dimensions of professional practice: functional assessment, therapeutic intervention, prognostic prediction, and support for documentation and decision-making. Evidence in emerging areas of the discipline, namely oncology, pelvic floor, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, is also examined and found to be incipient. Evidence published between 2022 and 2026 supports benefits in assessment objectivity, continuous monitoring and reduced documentation burden, with small effect sizes in therapeutic applications. Substantial gaps persist: insufficient external validation, algorithmic bias in underrepresented populations, lagging professional adoption, and limited interpretability of opaque models. The applicable governance framework is systematised, including World Health Organization guidance, the European Union AI Act, Chile's National Artificial Intelligence Policy and Law 21,719. We conclude that these tools operate as inputs to clinical reasoning rather than substitutes for professional judgement, and that Chile has the infrastructure and policy framework but still lacks the local scientific output needed to validate and adapt these models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 457-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S071686402600074X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering routine kinesiology practice. This narrative review maps its current status across four dimensions of professional practice: functional assessment, therapeutic intervention, prognostic prediction, and support for documentation and decision-making. Evidence in emerging areas of the discipline, namely oncology, pelvic floor, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, is also examined and found to be incipient. Evidence published between 2022 and 2026 supports benefits in assessment objectivity, continuous monitoring and reduced documentation burden, with small effect sizes in therapeutic applications. Substantial gaps persist: insufficient external validation, algorithmic bias in underrepresented populations, lagging professional adoption, and limited interpretability of opaque models. The applicable governance framework is systematised, including World Health Organization guidance, the European Union AI Act, Chile's National Artificial Intelligence Policy and Law 21,719. We conclude that these tools operate as inputs to clinical reasoning rather than substitutes for professional judgement, and that Chile has the infrastructure and policy framework but still lacks the local scientific output needed to validate and adapt these models.
运动学中的人工智能:应用、机遇和障碍:叙事回顾
人工智能(AI)正在进入日常的人体运动学实践。这篇叙述性综述从专业实践的四个方面描绘了其现状:功能评估、治疗干预、预后预测以及对文件和决策的支持。证据在新兴领域的学科,即肿瘤学,盆底,颌面康复,也检查和发现是初期。2022年至2026年间发表的证据支持在评估客观性、持续监测和减少文件负担方面的益处,在治疗应用中效果较小。实质性的差距仍然存在:外部验证不足,在代表性不足的人群中存在算法偏差,专业采用滞后,不透明模型的可解释性有限。适用的治理框架是系统化的,包括世界卫生组织指南、欧洲联盟人工智能法、智利国家人工智能政策和法律21,719。我们的结论是,这些工具作为临床推理的输入,而不是专业判断的替代品,智利拥有基础设施和政策框架,但仍然缺乏验证和调整这些模型所需的当地科学产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书