{"title":"Learning effect on the six-minute walk test in patients enrolled in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program","authors":"Isabel Margarita Muñoz-Muñoz PT, MSc, Rodrigo Torres-Castro PT, MSc, Matías Otto-Yáñez PT, PhD, Bárbara Burgos-Mansilla PT, PhD, Lilian Solis-Navarro PT, MSc, Ivana González PT, Francis-Édouard Gravier PT, PhD, Luz Alejandra Lorca PT, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is routinely used to assess functional capacity in clinical practice and research. However, in adults with hematologic malignancies enrolled in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) program, its test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error remain insufficiently characterized.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error of the 6MWT in adults enrolled in an HSCT program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional test–retest study included 45 adults receiving pre- or post-HSCT care who completed two standardized 6MWTs separated by 24<!--> <!-->hours. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was the primary outcome. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while measurement error was examined using Bland–Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC<sup>95</sup>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean 6MWD increased from 483.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->120.6 m on the first test to 496.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->124.5 m on the second, demonstrating a learning effect. The mean between-test difference was 13.4 m, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->10.9 to 37.8 m. Test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.995, 95% CI 0.991–0.997). The MDC<sup>95</sup> for the total sample was 24.17 m.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In adults enrolled in an HSCT program, the 6MWT demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability but also a measurable learning effect. These findings support repeating the test when establishing baseline functional capacity to improve the accuracy of longitudinal interpretation during physiotherapy assessment and follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 416-424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864026000714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is routinely used to assess functional capacity in clinical practice and research. However, in adults with hematologic malignancies enrolled in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) program, its test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error remain insufficiently characterized.
Objective
To determine the test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error of the 6MWT in adults enrolled in an HSCT program.
Methods
This cross-sectional test–retest study included 45 adults receiving pre- or post-HSCT care who completed two standardized 6MWTs separated by 24 hours. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was the primary outcome. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while measurement error was examined using Bland–Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95).
Results
Mean 6MWD increased from 483.1 ± 120.6 m on the first test to 496.6 ± 124.5 m on the second, demonstrating a learning effect. The mean between-test difference was 13.4 m, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from − 10.9 to 37.8 m. Test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.995, 95% CI 0.991–0.997). The MDC95 for the total sample was 24.17 m.
Conclusion
In adults enrolled in an HSCT program, the 6MWT demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability but also a measurable learning effect. These findings support repeating the test when establishing baseline functional capacity to improve the accuracy of longitudinal interpretation during physiotherapy assessment and follow-up.