Learning effect on the six-minute walk test in patients enrolled in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.06.006
Isabel Margarita Muñoz-Muñoz PT, MSc, Rodrigo Torres-Castro PT, MSc, Matías Otto-Yáñez PT, PhD, Bárbara Burgos-Mansilla PT, PhD, Lilian Solis-Navarro PT, MSc, Ivana González PT, Francis-Édouard Gravier PT, PhD, Luz Alejandra Lorca PT, MSc
{"title":"Learning effect on the six-minute walk test in patients enrolled in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program","authors":"Isabel Margarita Muñoz-Muñoz PT, MSc,&nbsp;Rodrigo Torres-Castro PT, MSc,&nbsp;Matías Otto-Yáñez PT, PhD,&nbsp;Bárbara Burgos-Mansilla PT, PhD,&nbsp;Lilian Solis-Navarro PT, MSc,&nbsp;Ivana González PT,&nbsp;Francis-Édouard Gravier PT, PhD,&nbsp;Luz Alejandra Lorca PT, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is routinely used to assess functional capacity in clinical practice and research. However, in adults with hematologic malignancies enrolled in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) program, its test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error remain insufficiently characterized.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error of the 6MWT in adults enrolled in an HSCT program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional test–retest study included 45 adults receiving pre- or post-HSCT care who completed two standardized 6MWTs separated by 24<!--> <!-->hours. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was the primary outcome. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while measurement error was examined using Bland–Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC<sup>95</sup>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean 6MWD increased from 483.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->120.6 m on the first test to 496.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->124.5 m on the second, demonstrating a learning effect. The mean between-test difference was 13.4 m, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->10.9 to 37.8 m. Test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.995, 95% CI 0.991–0.997). The MDC<sup>95</sup> for the total sample was 24.17 m.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In adults enrolled in an HSCT program, the 6MWT demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability but also a measurable learning effect. These findings support repeating the test when establishing baseline functional capacity to improve the accuracy of longitudinal interpretation during physiotherapy assessment and follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 416-424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864026000714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is routinely used to assess functional capacity in clinical practice and research. However, in adults with hematologic malignancies enrolled in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) program, its test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error remain insufficiently characterized.

Objective

To determine the test–retest reliability, learning effect, and measurement error of the 6MWT in adults enrolled in an HSCT program.

Methods

This cross-sectional test–retest study included 45 adults receiving pre- or post-HSCT care who completed two standardized 6MWTs separated by 24 hours. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was the primary outcome. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while measurement error was examined using Bland–Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95).

Results

Mean 6MWD increased from 483.1 ± 120.6 m on the first test to 496.6 ± 124.5 m on the second, demonstrating a learning effect. The mean between-test difference was 13.4 m, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from − 10.9 to 37.8 m. Test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.995, 95% CI 0.991–0.997). The MDC95 for the total sample was 24.17 m.

Conclusion

In adults enrolled in an HSCT program, the 6MWT demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability but also a measurable learning effect. These findings support repeating the test when establishing baseline functional capacity to improve the accuracy of longitudinal interpretation during physiotherapy assessment and follow-up.
参与造血干细胞移植项目的患者6分钟步行测试的学习效果
在临床实践和研究中,6分钟步行测试(6MWT)通常用于评估功能能力。然而,在参加造血干细胞移植(HSCT)项目的成人血液恶性肿瘤患者中,其测试-重测可靠性、学习效果和测量误差仍然没有充分表征。目的探讨成人HSCT测试中6MWT的重测信度、学习效果和测量误差。这项横断面测试-重测研究包括45名接受hsct前或后治疗的成年人,他们完成了两次标准化的6mwt,间隔24小时。6分钟步行距离(6MWD)是主要终点。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度,而使用Bland-Altman分析、测量标准误差(SEM)和95%置信水平下的最小可检测变化(MDC95)检查测量误差。结果平均6MWD由第一次测试的483.1±120.6 m增加到第二次测试的496.6±124.5 m,显示出学习效果。试验间平均差异为13.4 m, 95%的一致性范围为−10.9 ~ 37.8 m。重测信度极好(ICC = 0.995, 95% CI 0.991 ~ 0.997)。总样品的MDC95为24.17 m。在参加HSCT项目的成人中,6MWT表现出良好的重测信度和可测量的学习效果。这些发现支持在建立基线功能能力时重复测试,以提高物理治疗评估和随访期间纵向解释的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书