Protocolos de rehabilitación mediante ejercicio y métodos para la evaluación de la función física y calidad de vida en pacientes sometidos a diálisis peritoneal: una revisión sistemática

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.07.003
Macarena González-Farfán MSc, Carlos Moris MSc, Carlos Poblete-Aro PhD, Alexis Espinoza-Salinas PhD, Javier Russell-Guzmán PhD
{"title":"Protocolos de rehabilitación mediante ejercicio y métodos para la evaluación de la función física y calidad de vida en pacientes sometidos a diálisis peritoneal: una revisión sistemática","authors":"Macarena González-Farfán MSc,&nbsp;Carlos Moris MSc,&nbsp;Carlos Poblete-Aro PhD,&nbsp;Alexis Espinoza-Salinas PhD,&nbsp;Javier Russell-Guzmán PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) impairs quality of life and requires renal replacement therapies such as peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although exercise has shown benefits, evidence regarding exercise protocols and evaluation methods in this population remains limited. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the characteristics of exercise protocols and the methods used to assess physical function, quality of life, and other clinical outcomes in patients with ESKD undergoing PD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, PEDro, Web of Science, and EBSCO, including studies in adults undergoing PD with exercise interventions =4 weeks. The review was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 statement, and risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 347 records identified, 7 studies (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->249 patients) were included. Interventions were predominantly 12 weeks long, with 2–5 weekly sessions of endurance, resistance, or combined training, delivered through supervised or telerehabilitation modalities. Intensity ranged from light to moderate (40–85% HRmax), and session duration varied between 25 and 60<!--> <!-->minutes. Progression was poorly reported. Physical function tests and quality of life questionnaires (KDQOL-36, SF-36) were commonly used. All studies presented a high overall risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is substantial heterogeneity in exercise protocols and evaluation methods in patients with ESKD undergoing PD. This variability, along with the high risk of bias, limits the generalizability of findings and highlights the need for more rigorous, standardized, and comparable protocols, including telerehabilitation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 494-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864026000775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) impairs quality of life and requires renal replacement therapies such as peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although exercise has shown benefits, evidence regarding exercise protocols and evaluation methods in this population remains limited. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the characteristics of exercise protocols and the methods used to assess physical function, quality of life, and other clinical outcomes in patients with ESKD undergoing PD.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, PEDro, Web of Science, and EBSCO, including studies in adults undergoing PD with exercise interventions =4 weeks. The review was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 statement, and risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.

Results

Of 347 records identified, 7 studies (n = 249 patients) were included. Interventions were predominantly 12 weeks long, with 2–5 weekly sessions of endurance, resistance, or combined training, delivered through supervised or telerehabilitation modalities. Intensity ranged from light to moderate (40–85% HRmax), and session duration varied between 25 and 60 minutes. Progression was poorly reported. Physical function tests and quality of life questionnaires (KDQOL-36, SF-36) were commonly used. All studies presented a high overall risk of bias.

Conclusions

There is substantial heterogeneity in exercise protocols and evaluation methods in patients with ESKD undergoing PD. This variability, along with the high risk of bias, limits the generalizability of findings and highlights the need for more rigorous, standardized, and comparable protocols, including telerehabilitation strategies.
运动康复方案和评估腹膜透析患者身体功能和生活质量的方法:系统综述
终末期肾病(ESKD)损害生活质量,需要肾脏替代疗法,如腹膜透析(PD)。尽管运动已经显示出益处,但关于这一人群的运动方案和评估方法的证据仍然有限。本系统综述的目的是综合运动方案的特点,以及用于评估ESKD患者接受PD的身体功能、生活质量和其他临床结果的方法。方法通过PubMed、ScienceDirect、PEDro、Web of Science和EBSCO进行系统综述,包括对成人PD患者进行运动干预=4周的研究。该综述根据PRISMA 2020声明进行报道,并使用RoB 2评估偏倚风险。结果在347份记录中,纳入7项研究(n = 249例患者)。干预主要是为期12周,每周2-5次耐力、阻力或联合训练,通过监督或远程康复方式进行。强度从轻度到中度(40-85% HRmax),持续时间从25到60分钟不等。进展情况的报道很少。常用身体功能测试和生活质量问卷(KDQOL-36、SF-36)。所有的研究都有较高的偏倚风险。结论ESKD患者接受PD治疗的运动方案和评估方法存在很大的异质性。这种可变性以及高偏倚风险限制了研究结果的普遍性,并强调需要更严格、标准化和可比较的方案,包括远程康复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书