{"title":"ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF FOOT INTRINSIC MUSCLES IN THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE. A SCOPING REVIEW","authors":"Oscar Valencia PT, MSc, Carolina Naranjo PT, Hilda Aravena PT, MSc, Danae Bugueño PT, Rodrigo Barreto PT, Felipe Palma PT, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2026.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Intrinsic foot muscles (IFM) are essential for medial arch support and biomechanical stability, yet standardized electromyography (EMG) methodology remains underdeveloped. This scoping review synthesized existing literature to identify which IFM and EMG methods are most used during therapeutic exercises, aiming to map current practices and guide future research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Scoping review. Original articles evaluating IFM activity via EMG during therapeutic exercise, published between January 2000 and December 2025, were searched in PubMed and Scopus databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Key concepts extracted included muscles evaluated, exercise type, EMG acquisition system, and electrode placement across different contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 121 initial records, 28 studies were included. The abductor hallucis (AbdH) was the dominant muscle evaluated (26/28 studies), due to its location and size. Short foot and toe-spread exercises were most frequently investigated (19/28 studies). Surface EMG in bipolar configuration (26/28 studies) with a 20<!--> <!-->mm inter-electrode distance was the predominant methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on these results, surface EMG of the AbdH during short foot and toe-spread exercises represents the dominant methodological paradigm. However, the standard 20<!--> <!-->mm inter-electrode distance may be suboptimal for the densely packed IFM, raising crosstalk concerns. Future research should explore ultrasound-guided electrode placement and smaller inter-electrode distances (10<!--> <!-->mm) to improve measurement precision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 435-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864026000738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Intrinsic foot muscles (IFM) are essential for medial arch support and biomechanical stability, yet standardized electromyography (EMG) methodology remains underdeveloped. This scoping review synthesized existing literature to identify which IFM and EMG methods are most used during therapeutic exercises, aiming to map current practices and guide future research.
Methods
Scoping review. Original articles evaluating IFM activity via EMG during therapeutic exercise, published between January 2000 and December 2025, were searched in PubMed and Scopus databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Key concepts extracted included muscles evaluated, exercise type, EMG acquisition system, and electrode placement across different contexts.
Results
From 121 initial records, 28 studies were included. The abductor hallucis (AbdH) was the dominant muscle evaluated (26/28 studies), due to its location and size. Short foot and toe-spread exercises were most frequently investigated (19/28 studies). Surface EMG in bipolar configuration (26/28 studies) with a 20 mm inter-electrode distance was the predominant methodology.
Conclusions
Based on these results, surface EMG of the AbdH during short foot and toe-spread exercises represents the dominant methodological paradigm. However, the standard 20 mm inter-electrode distance may be suboptimal for the densely packed IFM, raising crosstalk concerns. Future research should explore ultrasound-guided electrode placement and smaller inter-electrode distances (10 mm) to improve measurement precision.