Fabrication techniques for thin-walled silicone ocular implants using parylene-C coated 3D-printed molds.

Discover polymers Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s44347-026-00063-7
Hyeonji Kim, Wen Hong, Sajjad Abdollahramezani, Daanyal Raja, Roger Wise, Ian Coates, Joseph M DeSimone, Charles DeBoer
{"title":"Fabrication techniques for thin-walled silicone ocular implants using parylene-C coated 3D-printed molds.","authors":"Hyeonji Kim, Wen Hong, Sajjad Abdollahramezani, Daanyal Raja, Roger Wise, Ian Coates, Joseph M DeSimone, Charles DeBoer","doi":"10.1007/s44347-026-00063-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Silicone drug delivery implants are widely used, but their fabrication often relies on non‑standardized, empirically tuned protocols that limit reproducibility and transfer across labs. Here, we present a reproducible and generalizable fabrication workflow that brings together design rules, process settings, and validation for rapid fabrication of complex thin-walled biocompatible silicone implants. We outline mold design choices, including vents and micro refill-valve/filter placement, and post‑processing to make smooth inner surfaces, and we compare molds using an applied release agent (mold‑release chemical) versus molds coated with a parylene‑C barrier. Contact angle, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and residue analyses show that parylene‑C prevents cure inhibition and enables clean demolding. We then link spin‑coating variables to membrane thickness and use rheology to guide material selection for pattern fidelity. We also correlate the curing time with network formation and extractable content. Device-level cross-sectional analyses and cytocompatibility assays are also conducted, with the assays indicating excellent compatibility with cells. Taken together, this work provides practical, transferable practice guidance and a reference workflow that other laboratories can adopt to make consistent silicone drug delivery implants and move the field toward standardization.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-026-00063-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":520844,"journal":{"name":"Discover polymers","volume":"3 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13569541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover polymers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-026-00063-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Silicone drug delivery implants are widely used, but their fabrication often relies on non‑standardized, empirically tuned protocols that limit reproducibility and transfer across labs. Here, we present a reproducible and generalizable fabrication workflow that brings together design rules, process settings, and validation for rapid fabrication of complex thin-walled biocompatible silicone implants. We outline mold design choices, including vents and micro refill-valve/filter placement, and post‑processing to make smooth inner surfaces, and we compare molds using an applied release agent (mold‑release chemical) versus molds coated with a parylene‑C barrier. Contact angle, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and residue analyses show that parylene‑C prevents cure inhibition and enables clean demolding. We then link spin‑coating variables to membrane thickness and use rheology to guide material selection for pattern fidelity. We also correlate the curing time with network formation and extractable content. Device-level cross-sectional analyses and cytocompatibility assays are also conducted, with the assays indicating excellent compatibility with cells. Taken together, this work provides practical, transferable practice guidance and a reference workflow that other laboratories can adopt to make consistent silicone drug delivery implants and move the field toward standardization.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-026-00063-7.

使用聚苯乙烯- c涂层3d打印模具的薄壁硅胶眼植入物制造技术。
硅胶给药植入物被广泛使用,但它们的制造往往依赖于非标准化的、经验调整的协议,这限制了可重复性和跨实验室的转移。在这里,我们提出了一个可重复和可推广的制造工作流程,将设计规则、工艺设置和验证结合在一起,用于快速制造复杂的薄壁生物相容性硅胶植入物。我们概述了模具设计的选择,包括通风口和微型再填充阀/过滤器的放置,以及使内表面光滑的后处理,我们比较了使用脱模剂(脱模化学物质)和涂有聚对二甲苯屏障的模具。接触角、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)和残留物分析表明,聚对二甲苯- C可以防止固化抑制,实现清洁脱模。然后,我们将自旋涂层变量与膜厚度联系起来,并使用流变学来指导图案保真度的材料选择。我们还将固化时间与网络形成和可提取内容联系起来。还进行了设备级横断面分析和细胞相容性分析,这些分析表明与细胞具有良好的相容性。总之,这项工作提供了实用的、可转移的实践指导和参考工作流程,其他实验室可以采用该工作流程来制造一致的硅酮给药植入物,并将该领域推向标准化。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-026-00063-7上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书