Redefining the role of custom post and core systems: Moving beyond retention to structural reinforcement of severely compromised teeth: An in vitro study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mahmoud Shams, Walid Al-Zordk, Nesma Elgohary, Mohamed Ghazy
{"title":"Redefining the role of custom post and core systems: Moving beyond retention to structural reinforcement of severely compromised teeth: An in vitro study.","authors":"Mahmoud Shams, Walid Al-Zordk, Nesma Elgohary, Mohamed Ghazy","doi":"10.1111/jopr.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reinforcing potential of custom post and core restorations of varying materials and designs on the fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated maxillary first premolars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-six extracted maxillary first premolars were divided into seven groups (n = 8) based on custom post and core material and design. Three materials were investigated: lithium disilicate in classical (C) and modified (LM) designs, polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) in classical (PC) and modified (PM) designs, and zirconia in classical (ZC) and modified (ZM) designs, alongside a control group restored with zirconia crowns only. All experimental teeth underwent standardized tooth preparation and adhesive cementation and were subsequently restored with zirconia crowns. Following thermomechanical aging (10,000 thermal cycles and 240,000 cyclic loading cycles), fracture resistance was evaluated under compressive loading, failure modes were recorded, and the resulting data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant interaction was found between material and design. The LM group achieved the highest fracture resistance (2900.25 ± 325.36 N), closely approaching the control group (3213.12 ± 406.74 N) with predominantly favorable failure modes (62.5%-75%). The PEKK groups demonstrated comparably lower fracture resistance values (PC: 1287.63 ± 122.97 N; PM: 1132.75 ± 138.34 N) yet exhibited exclusively favorable failure modes (100%). The ZM group recorded the lowest fracture resistance (879 ± 170.35 N) with the highest prevalence of unfavorable failure modes (87.5%-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All tested groups demonstrated clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. Lithium disilicate and PEKK custom post and core restorations each contributed to structural reinforcement in a distinct way-lithium disilicate through superior load-bearing capacity and PEKK through superior biomechanical protective capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the reinforcing potential of custom post and core restorations of varying materials and designs on the fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated maxillary first premolars.

Materials and methods: Fifty-six extracted maxillary first premolars were divided into seven groups (n = 8) based on custom post and core material and design. Three materials were investigated: lithium disilicate in classical (C) and modified (LM) designs, polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) in classical (PC) and modified (PM) designs, and zirconia in classical (ZC) and modified (ZM) designs, alongside a control group restored with zirconia crowns only. All experimental teeth underwent standardized tooth preparation and adhesive cementation and were subsequently restored with zirconia crowns. Following thermomechanical aging (10,000 thermal cycles and 240,000 cyclic loading cycles), fracture resistance was evaluated under compressive loading, failure modes were recorded, and the resulting data were statistically analyzed.

Results: A significant interaction was found between material and design. The LM group achieved the highest fracture resistance (2900.25 ± 325.36 N), closely approaching the control group (3213.12 ± 406.74 N) with predominantly favorable failure modes (62.5%-75%). The PEKK groups demonstrated comparably lower fracture resistance values (PC: 1287.63 ± 122.97 N; PM: 1132.75 ± 138.34 N) yet exhibited exclusively favorable failure modes (100%). The ZM group recorded the lowest fracture resistance (879 ± 170.35 N) with the highest prevalence of unfavorable failure modes (87.5%-100%).

Conclusion: All tested groups demonstrated clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. Lithium disilicate and PEKK custom post and core restorations each contributed to structural reinforcement in a distinct way-lithium disilicate through superior load-bearing capacity and PEKK through superior biomechanical protective capacity.

重新定义自定义桩核系统的作用:从固位到严重受损牙齿的结构加固:一项体外研究。
目的:评价不同材料和设计的定制桩核修复体对根管治疗的上颌第一前磨牙的抗折性和破坏模式的增强潜力。材料与方法:拔除的上颌第一前磨牙56颗,根据自定义桩核材料及设计分为7组(n = 8)。研究了三种材料:经典(C)和改良(LM)设计的二硅酸锂,经典(PC)和改良(PM)设计的聚醚酮酮(PEKK),经典(ZC)和改良(ZM)设计的氧化锆,以及仅用氧化锆冠修复的对照组。所有的实验牙均进行了标准化的牙齿准备和胶粘接,随后用氧化锆冠修复。在进行热力老化(1万次热循环和24万次循环加载)后,评估压缩载荷下的抗断裂性能,记录失效模式,并对结果数据进行统计分析。结果:材料与设计之间存在显著的交互作用。LM组获得了最高的断裂阻力(2900.25±325.36 N),接近对照组(3213.12±406.74 N),以有利的断裂模式(62.5%-75%)为主。PEKK组表现出相对较低的断裂抗力值(PC: 1287.63±122.97 N; PM: 1132.75±138.34 N),但表现出完全有利的破坏模式(100%)。ZM组的抗断裂能力最低(879±170.35 N),不良断裂模式发生率最高(87.5% ~ 100%)。结论:所有实验组均表现出临床可接受的骨折阻力值。二硅酸锂和PEKK定制桩核修复体都以不同的方式对结构加固做出了贡献——二硅酸锂通过优越的承重能力,PEKK通过优越的生物力学保护能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书