Gina Fisher, Amber B Cohen, Emina Prguda, Madeline Romaniuk
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Nightmare Distress Questionnaire in Veterans with Posttraumatic Nightmares.","authors":"Gina Fisher, Amber B Cohen, Emina Prguda, Madeline Romaniuk","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2026.2729031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study examined the psychometric properties of the Nightmare Distress Questionnaire (NDQ) in veterans with a provisional posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and trauma-related nightmares.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 659 Australian Defence Force veterans who completed online questionnaires for a larger study investigating military-civilian transition. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis, and evaluation of internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity in a subsample of 191 veterans meeting provisional PTSD diagnostic criteria and endorsing trauma-related nightmares. An independent samples <i>t</i>-test assessed discriminant validity, comparing NDQ scores between participants with (<i>n</i> = 280) and without (<i>n</i> = 379) a provisional PTSD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Principal-axis factoring suggested a one-factor solution comprising 10 items that explained 51.46% of the variance in nightmare distress. The NDQ demonstrated strong internal consistency, and correlations with validated measures supported convergent and divergent validity. NDQ scores were significantly higher for veterans with a provisional PTSD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings offer initial evidence of the NDQ's validity and reliability to assess trauma-related nightmare distress among veterans. We provide novel insights into the NDQ's utility for researchers and clinicians working with veteran populations, including its ability to differentiate veterans based on PTSD symptomatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2026.2729031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The study examined the psychometric properties of the Nightmare Distress Questionnaire (NDQ) in veterans with a provisional posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and trauma-related nightmares.
Method: Participants were 659 Australian Defence Force veterans who completed online questionnaires for a larger study investigating military-civilian transition. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis, and evaluation of internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity in a subsample of 191 veterans meeting provisional PTSD diagnostic criteria and endorsing trauma-related nightmares. An independent samples t-test assessed discriminant validity, comparing NDQ scores between participants with (n = 280) and without (n = 379) a provisional PTSD diagnosis.
Results: Principal-axis factoring suggested a one-factor solution comprising 10 items that explained 51.46% of the variance in nightmare distress. The NDQ demonstrated strong internal consistency, and correlations with validated measures supported convergent and divergent validity. NDQ scores were significantly higher for veterans with a provisional PTSD diagnosis.
Conclusions: Findings offer initial evidence of the NDQ's validity and reliability to assess trauma-related nightmare distress among veterans. We provide novel insights into the NDQ's utility for researchers and clinicians working with veteran populations, including its ability to differentiate veterans based on PTSD symptomatology.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.