Quality of Pulmonary Hypertension Care Within Expert PH Centers: Patient and Provider Perspectives From a Multi-Site Qualitative Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2026-09-11 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.70408
Michelle M Hall, Seppo T Rinne, A Rani Elwy, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Kari R Gillmeyer
{"title":"Quality of Pulmonary Hypertension Care Within Expert PH Centers: Patient and Provider Perspectives From a Multi-Site Qualitative Study.","authors":"Michelle M Hall, Seppo T Rinne, A Rani Elwy, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Kari R Gillmeyer","doi":"10.1002/pul2.70408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements, gaps in PH care quality persist, though the drivers of these gaps are incompletely understood. Thus, we sought to explore patient and provider perspectives on high-quality PH care. We conducted a multi-site qualitative study at three expert PH centers in the United States, involving telephone interviews with 20 providers and 22 patients. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis, using the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six domains of healthcare quality (safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable) as an a priori coding scheme, with subcodes developed under each domain. We then compared codes across IOM domains and patient and provider data to identify overarching themes. Our analysis revealed three cross-cutting themes that encompassed all six IOM healthcare quality domains, covered all identified subcodes, and represented both provider and patient perspectives: (1) \"It takes a village,\" that is, the expansive team needed to provide care for a patient with PH; (2) The need for care coordination within a PH center, with specialty pharmacies, and with community providers; and (3) PH centers as a model to deliver high-quality care. Finally, participants offered clear recommendations for addressing gaps in care quality, including expanding village members, such as the addition of social workers, improving care coordination by improving patient follow-up and tracking, and expanding access to PH centers by having a PH center presence in the community. These findings highlight key areas for targeted improvements in PH care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":"16 3","pages":"e70408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13567799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements, gaps in PH care quality persist, though the drivers of these gaps are incompletely understood. Thus, we sought to explore patient and provider perspectives on high-quality PH care. We conducted a multi-site qualitative study at three expert PH centers in the United States, involving telephone interviews with 20 providers and 22 patients. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis, using the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six domains of healthcare quality (safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable) as an a priori coding scheme, with subcodes developed under each domain. We then compared codes across IOM domains and patient and provider data to identify overarching themes. Our analysis revealed three cross-cutting themes that encompassed all six IOM healthcare quality domains, covered all identified subcodes, and represented both provider and patient perspectives: (1) "It takes a village," that is, the expansive team needed to provide care for a patient with PH; (2) The need for care coordination within a PH center, with specialty pharmacies, and with community providers; and (3) PH centers as a model to deliver high-quality care. Finally, participants offered clear recommendations for addressing gaps in care quality, including expanding village members, such as the addition of social workers, improving care coordination by improving patient follow-up and tracking, and expanding access to PH centers by having a PH center presence in the community. These findings highlight key areas for targeted improvements in PH care quality.

专家PH中心的肺动脉高压护理质量:来自多地点定性研究的患者和提供者观点。
肺动脉高压(PH)是一种高发病率和死亡率的进行性疾病。尽管取得了进步,但在PH护理质量方面的差距仍然存在,尽管这些差距的驱动因素尚未完全了解。因此,我们试图探索患者和提供者对高质量PH护理的看法。我们在美国的三家专业PH中心进行了多地点的定性研究,包括对20名提供者和22名患者进行了电话采访。我们进行了反思性主题分析,使用医学研究所(IOM)的六个医疗质量领域(安全、有效、以患者为中心、及时、高效和公平)作为先验编码方案,并在每个领域下开发了子代码。然后,我们比较了IOM领域的代码以及患者和提供者的数据,以确定总体主题。我们的分析揭示了三个交叉主题,涵盖了所有六个IOM医疗保健质量领域,涵盖了所有已确定的子代码,并代表了提供者和患者的观点:(1)“需要一个村庄”,即需要一个庞大的团队为PH患者提供护理;(2) PH中心内部、专业药房和社区提供者之间的护理协调需求;(3) PH中心作为提供高质量医疗服务的典范。最后,参与者对解决护理质量差距提出了明确的建议,包括扩大村庄成员,如增加社会工作者,通过改善患者随访和跟踪来改善护理协调,以及通过在社区设立PH中心来扩大PH中心的使用范围。这些发现突出了有针对性地改善PH护理质量的关键领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书