Magnesium Sulfate as an Analgesic and Sedative-sparing Agent in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2026-08-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_45_26
Amir-Mohammad Yaryari, Hossein Khalili, Massoud Ramezani, Samrand Fattah Ghazi, Mostafa Mohammadi
{"title":"Magnesium Sulfate as an Analgesic and Sedative-sparing Agent in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial.","authors":"Amir-Mohammad Yaryari, Hossein Khalili, Massoud Ramezani, Samrand Fattah Ghazi, Mostafa Mohammadi","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_45_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate in reducing sedative and analgesic requirements was examined in patients under mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, patients requiring mechanical ventilation received either magnesium sulfate (serum magnesium target level: near 3 mg/dL) or placebo concurrently with the hospital analgosedation protocol. The calculated dose of magnesium in the intervention group was infused over 24 h. The primary outcome of the study was the cumulative opioid requirement at 24 and 48 h after intubation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 110 patients were randomly assigned to either the placebo (<i>n</i> = 54) or the magnesium sulfate (<i>n</i> = 56) group. The results showed that the cumulative opioid consumption in the magnesium group was significantly less than in the control group at 24 h postintervention (120 mg vs. 214 mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001). This difference remained significant at 48 h postintervention (240 mg vs. 433 mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001). In addition, in the adjusted analysis using analysis of covariance, after adjustment for the model for acetaminophen dose and additive sedatives as confounders, this still remained statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administration of magnesium sulfate targeting a serum magnesium level near 3 mg/dL in patients under mechanical ventilation reduced opioid requirements and may be considered as an analgesic and sedative-sparing agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13570697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_45_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate in reducing sedative and analgesic requirements was examined in patients under mechanical ventilation.

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, patients requiring mechanical ventilation received either magnesium sulfate (serum magnesium target level: near 3 mg/dL) or placebo concurrently with the hospital analgosedation protocol. The calculated dose of magnesium in the intervention group was infused over 24 h. The primary outcome of the study was the cumulative opioid requirement at 24 and 48 h after intubation.

Findings: A total of 110 patients were randomly assigned to either the placebo (n = 54) or the magnesium sulfate (n = 56) group. The results showed that the cumulative opioid consumption in the magnesium group was significantly less than in the control group at 24 h postintervention (120 mg vs. 214 mg, P < 0.001). This difference remained significant at 48 h postintervention (240 mg vs. 433 mg, P < 0.001). In addition, in the adjusted analysis using analysis of covariance, after adjustment for the model for acetaminophen dose and additive sedatives as confounders, this still remained statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Administration of magnesium sulfate targeting a serum magnesium level near 3 mg/dL in patients under mechanical ventilation reduced opioid requirements and may be considered as an analgesic and sedative-sparing agent.

硫酸镁作为机械通气患者的镇痛和镇静保留剂:一项随机、双盲临床试验。
目的:观察静脉注射硫酸镁降低机械通气患者镇静镇痛需求的效果。方法:在这项随机临床试验中,需要机械通气的患者在接受医院镇痛方案的同时接受硫酸镁(血清镁目标水平:接近3mg /dL)或安慰剂治疗。干预组在24小时内注射镁的计算剂量。研究的主要结果是插管后24和48小时的阿片类药物累积需要量。结果:共有110名患者被随机分配到安慰剂组(n = 54)或硫酸镁组(n = 56)。结果显示,干预后24 h,镁组的阿片类药物累积消耗量显著低于对照组(120 mg vs. 214 mg, P < 0.001)。这种差异在干预后48小时仍然显著(240 mg对433 mg, P < 0.001)。此外,在协方差分析的校正分析中,在对乙酰氨基酚剂量和添加性镇静剂作为混杂因素的模型进行校正后,这仍然具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:在机械通气患者的血清镁水平接近3 mg/dL时给予硫酸镁可减少阿片类药物的需求,可能被认为是一种镇痛和镇静节省剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书