{"title":"Magnesium Sulfate as an Analgesic and Sedative-sparing Agent in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial.","authors":"Amir-Mohammad Yaryari, Hossein Khalili, Massoud Ramezani, Samrand Fattah Ghazi, Mostafa Mohammadi","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_45_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate in reducing sedative and analgesic requirements was examined in patients under mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, patients requiring mechanical ventilation received either magnesium sulfate (serum magnesium target level: near 3 mg/dL) or placebo concurrently with the hospital analgosedation protocol. The calculated dose of magnesium in the intervention group was infused over 24 h. The primary outcome of the study was the cumulative opioid requirement at 24 and 48 h after intubation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 110 patients were randomly assigned to either the placebo (<i>n</i> = 54) or the magnesium sulfate (<i>n</i> = 56) group. The results showed that the cumulative opioid consumption in the magnesium group was significantly less than in the control group at 24 h postintervention (120 mg vs. 214 mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001). This difference remained significant at 48 h postintervention (240 mg vs. 433 mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001). In addition, in the adjusted analysis using analysis of covariance, after adjustment for the model for acetaminophen dose and additive sedatives as confounders, this still remained statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administration of magnesium sulfate targeting a serum magnesium level near 3 mg/dL in patients under mechanical ventilation reduced opioid requirements and may be considered as an analgesic and sedative-sparing agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13570697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_45_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate in reducing sedative and analgesic requirements was examined in patients under mechanical ventilation.
Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, patients requiring mechanical ventilation received either magnesium sulfate (serum magnesium target level: near 3 mg/dL) or placebo concurrently with the hospital analgosedation protocol. The calculated dose of magnesium in the intervention group was infused over 24 h. The primary outcome of the study was the cumulative opioid requirement at 24 and 48 h after intubation.
Findings: A total of 110 patients were randomly assigned to either the placebo (n = 54) or the magnesium sulfate (n = 56) group. The results showed that the cumulative opioid consumption in the magnesium group was significantly less than in the control group at 24 h postintervention (120 mg vs. 214 mg, P < 0.001). This difference remained significant at 48 h postintervention (240 mg vs. 433 mg, P < 0.001). In addition, in the adjusted analysis using analysis of covariance, after adjustment for the model for acetaminophen dose and additive sedatives as confounders, this still remained statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Administration of magnesium sulfate targeting a serum magnesium level near 3 mg/dL in patients under mechanical ventilation reduced opioid requirements and may be considered as an analgesic and sedative-sparing agent.
期刊介绍:
The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.