Utilization of Carbon Fiber Spinal Instrumentation in Primary Spinal Tumors: Outcome Analysis from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gisberto Evangelisti, Feng Wei, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Laurence D Rhines, Ziya L Gokaslan, Jeremy Reynolds, Alessandro Luzzati, Alexander C Disch, Praveen V Mummaneni, Daniel G Tobert, Michelle J Clarke, Aron Lazary, Chetan Bettegowda, Riccardo Cecchinato, Stefano Boriani, Ori Barzilai, Cordula Netzer, Arjun Sahgal, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Charles G Fisher, Ilya Laufer, Nicolas Dea
{"title":"Utilization of Carbon Fiber Spinal Instrumentation in Primary Spinal Tumors: Outcome Analysis from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network.","authors":"Gisberto Evangelisti, Feng Wei, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Laurence D Rhines, Ziya L Gokaslan, Jeremy Reynolds, Alessandro Luzzati, Alexander C Disch, Praveen V Mummaneni, Daniel G Tobert, Michelle J Clarke, Aron Lazary, Chetan Bettegowda, Riccardo Cecchinato, Stefano Boriani, Ori Barzilai, Cordula Netzer, Arjun Sahgal, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Charles G Fisher, Ilya Laufer, Nicolas Dea","doi":"10.1177/21925682261417978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation in spinal surgery has emerged as an alternative to traditional titanium-based implants in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the use and performance of carbon fiber instrumentation in patients with primary spinal tumors focusing on adverse event (AE) risk, overall survival and oncologic outcomes.MethodsData were collected from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON), a multicenter international registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AEs, while secondary endpoints included the risk of developing at least one AE, overall survival, local tumor control, and disease progression.ResultsA total of 359 patients enrolled in the PTRON registry met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Among them, 84 receiving carbon fiber implants (23%), 243 titanium implants (68%), and 32 a combination of both (9%). Median follow-up times were 1.9 years (IQR: 0.4-3.0), 1.3 years (IQR: 0.5-2.4) and 1.1 years (IQR: 0.5-1.7), in the carbon fiber, titanium and combination groups, respectively. The estimated risk of having at least one postoperative AE, including construct failures with and without loss of correction, wound infection (deep or superficial), non-union and wound dehiscence, was statistically comparable between patients receiving carbon fiber, titanium or a combination of both carbon fiber and titanium implants (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed no significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, or progression-free survival between the implant groups.ConclusionCarbon fiber spinal implants demonstrate a comparable safety and oncologic profile to traditional titanium implants while allowing for improved tumor surveillance and easier radiation delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261417978"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13572746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261417978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation in spinal surgery has emerged as an alternative to traditional titanium-based implants in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the use and performance of carbon fiber instrumentation in patients with primary spinal tumors focusing on adverse event (AE) risk, overall survival and oncologic outcomes.MethodsData were collected from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON), a multicenter international registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AEs, while secondary endpoints included the risk of developing at least one AE, overall survival, local tumor control, and disease progression.ResultsA total of 359 patients enrolled in the PTRON registry met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Among them, 84 receiving carbon fiber implants (23%), 243 titanium implants (68%), and 32 a combination of both (9%). Median follow-up times were 1.9 years (IQR: 0.4-3.0), 1.3 years (IQR: 0.5-2.4) and 1.1 years (IQR: 0.5-1.7), in the carbon fiber, titanium and combination groups, respectively. The estimated risk of having at least one postoperative AE, including construct failures with and without loss of correction, wound infection (deep or superficial), non-union and wound dehiscence, was statistically comparable between patients receiving carbon fiber, titanium or a combination of both carbon fiber and titanium implants (P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed no significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, or progression-free survival between the implant groups.ConclusionCarbon fiber spinal implants demonstrate a comparable safety and oncologic profile to traditional titanium implants while allowing for improved tumor surveillance and easier radiation delivery.

碳纤维脊柱内固定在原发性脊柱肿瘤中的应用:来自AO脊柱原发性肿瘤研究和结果网络的结果分析。
近年来,在脊柱外科手术中使用碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮(CFR-PEEK)器械已成为传统钛基植入物的替代品。本研究旨在评估碳纤维器械在原发性脊柱肿瘤患者中的使用和性能,重点关注不良事件(AE)风险、总生存期和肿瘤预后。方法数据来自AO脊柱原发性肿瘤研究和结果网络(PTRON),这是一个多中心的国际注册中心。主要终点是不良事件的发生率,次要终点包括发生至少一种不良事件的风险、总生存期、局部肿瘤控制和疾病进展。结果共有359例患者在PTRON注册中心注册,符合纳入标准并被纳入研究。其中碳纤维种植体84例(23%),钛种植体243例(68%),两者结合32例(9%)。碳纤维组、钛组和复合组的中位随访时间分别为1.9年(IQR: 0.4-3.0)、1.3年(IQR: 0.5-2.4)和1.1年(IQR: 0.5-1.7)。在接受碳纤维、钛或碳纤维和钛联合植入的患者之间,至少发生一次术后AE的估计风险(包括有和没有矫正损失的构造失败、伤口感染(深部或浅表)、不愈合和伤口裂开)具有统计学上的可比性(P < 0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析和多变量Cox比例风险模型显示,种植体组之间的总生存期、无复发生存期或无进展生存期无显著差异。结论碳纤维脊柱植入物具有与传统钛植入物相当的安全性和肿瘤学特征,同时可以改善肿瘤监测和更容易的放射输送。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书