Real-World Evidence of Upadacitinib in Atopic Dermatitis after Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Dupilumab: The CAN UpTIMISE Study.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s13555-026-01907-7
Vimal H Prajapati, Vipul Jain, Melinda J Gooderham, Michael Cecchini, Jason K Lee, Charles W Lynde, Parbeer Grewal, Andrew Ferrier, David Préfontaine, Carly Sterling, H Chih-Ho Hong
{"title":"Real-World Evidence of Upadacitinib in Atopic Dermatitis after Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Dupilumab: The CAN UpTIMISE Study.","authors":"Vimal H Prajapati, Vipul Jain, Melinda J Gooderham, Michael Cecchini, Jason K Lee, Charles W Lynde, Parbeer Grewal, Andrew Ferrier, David Préfontaine, Carly Sterling, H Chih-Ho Hong","doi":"10.1007/s13555-026-01907-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upadacitinib and dupilumab are both approved treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Some dupilumab-treated patients may experience an inadequate response and/or safety/tolerability issues. Real-world data on the effectiveness of upadacitinib in this population remain limited. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in adults diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AD who were inadequate responders to dupilumab or discontinued dupilumab for safety/tolerability reasons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CAN UpTIMISE was a Canadian prospective, observational study in adults treated with dupilumab for moderate-to-severe AD with a decision to switch to upadacitinib (15/30 mg), per local label. Effectiveness was assessed over 4 months using the validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD), facial IGA, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient Oriented Eczema Measurement (POEM). Results are presented using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 108 patients (94.4% with vIGA-AD ≥ 2), 83.3% discontinued dupilumab due to inadequate effectiveness and 16.7% discontinued due to safety/tolerability reasons. At month 4, 65.9% (95% CI 55.1-75.2) achieved vIGA-AD 0/1 by observed case analysis (primary outcome), with improvements evident as early as month 1. At month 4 after upadacitinib initiation, 90.2%, 82.9%, and 52.4% of patients achieved EASI ≤ 7, ≤ 3, and ≤ 1, respectively; 70.5% with baseline WP-NRS > 4 had ≥ 4-point reduction and 46.7% reported WP-NRS 0/1. DLQI and POEM scores improved similarly, with 36.0% and 34.3%, respectively, achieving scores indicating no impact or clear/almost clear disease. Minimal disease activity (EASI ≤3 and WP-NRS 0/1) was reached by 43.8% of patients. Upadacitinib was generally well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upadacitinib provided rapid, clinically meaningful, and generally sustained improvements in disease activity, itch, and quality of life, supporting its role as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with inadequate response or intolerance to dupilumab in real-world practice. Graphical abstract available for this article.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05394792.</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"5195-5214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13650230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-026-01907-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Upadacitinib and dupilumab are both approved treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Some dupilumab-treated patients may experience an inadequate response and/or safety/tolerability issues. Real-world data on the effectiveness of upadacitinib in this population remain limited. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in adults diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AD who were inadequate responders to dupilumab or discontinued dupilumab for safety/tolerability reasons.

Methods: CAN UpTIMISE was a Canadian prospective, observational study in adults treated with dupilumab for moderate-to-severe AD with a decision to switch to upadacitinib (15/30 mg), per local label. Effectiveness was assessed over 4 months using the validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD), facial IGA, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient Oriented Eczema Measurement (POEM). Results are presented using descriptive statistics.

Results: Among 108 patients (94.4% with vIGA-AD ≥ 2), 83.3% discontinued dupilumab due to inadequate effectiveness and 16.7% discontinued due to safety/tolerability reasons. At month 4, 65.9% (95% CI 55.1-75.2) achieved vIGA-AD 0/1 by observed case analysis (primary outcome), with improvements evident as early as month 1. At month 4 after upadacitinib initiation, 90.2%, 82.9%, and 52.4% of patients achieved EASI ≤ 7, ≤ 3, and ≤ 1, respectively; 70.5% with baseline WP-NRS > 4 had ≥ 4-point reduction and 46.7% reported WP-NRS 0/1. DLQI and POEM scores improved similarly, with 36.0% and 34.3%, respectively, achieving scores indicating no impact or clear/almost clear disease. Minimal disease activity (EASI ≤3 and WP-NRS 0/1) was reached by 43.8% of patients. Upadacitinib was generally well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified.

Conclusions: Upadacitinib provided rapid, clinically meaningful, and generally sustained improvements in disease activity, itch, and quality of life, supporting its role as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with inadequate response or intolerance to dupilumab in real-world practice. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Trial registration: NCT05394792.

Upadacitinib治疗对Dupilumab反应不足或不耐受的特应性皮炎的真实证据:CAN UpTIMISE研究
Upadacitinib和dupilumab均被批准用于治疗中重度特应性皮炎(AD)。一些dupilumab治疗的患者可能会出现反应不足和/或安全性/耐受性问题。关于upadacitinib在这一人群中的有效性的实际数据仍然有限。目的是评估upadacitinib在诊断为中度至重度AD的成人患者中的有效性和安全性,这些患者对dupilumab反应不足或因安全性/耐受性原因停用dupilumab。方法:CAN UpTIMISE是一项加拿大前瞻性观察性研究,在接受dupilumab治疗中重度AD的成人中,根据当地标签,决定改用upadacitinib (15/ 30mg)。使用经过验证的AD研究者全球评估(vIGA-AD)、面部IGA、湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、最严重瘙痒数值评定量表(WP-NRS)、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和患者导向湿疹测量(POEM)在4个月内评估有效性。结果采用描述性统计。结果:在108例患者中(94.4%的vIGA-AD≥2),83.3%的患者因疗效不足而停药,16.7%的患者因安全性/耐受性原因而停药。在第4个月,通过观察病例分析(主要结局),65.9% (95% CI 55.1-75.2)达到了vIGA-AD 0/1,早在第1个月就有明显改善。在更新他替尼启动后第4个月,90.2%、82.9%和52.4%的患者分别达到EASI≤7、≤3和≤1;70.5%的基线WP-NRS >.4降低≥4个点,46.7%报告WP-NRS 0/1。DLQI和POEM评分也有类似的改善,分别为36.0%和34.3%,达到无影响或清除/几乎清除疾病的评分。43.8%的患者达到最低疾病活动度(EASI≤3,WP-NRS 0/1)。Upadacitinib总体耐受性良好,未发现新的安全性信号。结论:Upadacitinib在疾病活动性、瘙痒和生活质量方面提供了快速、有临床意义且通常持续的改善,支持其作为对dupilumab反应不足或不耐受的患者有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法。本文提供图形摘要。试验注册:NCT05394792。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology and Therapy
Dermatology and Therapy Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书