{"title":"Serum amyloid a as a high-resolution indicator of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis.","authors":"Kotaro Akita, Yoshihiro Yokoyama, Yuta Shimomori, Tomoe Kazama, Masanori Nojima, Hiroshi Nakase","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otag097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopy is the standard for assessing mucosal activity in ulcerative colitis (UC), but reliable biomarkers are needed. This study evaluated serum amyloid A (SAA) as a potential biomarker by comparing it with established markers in UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 182 patients with UC who underwent blood and stool testing within 14 days of colonoscopy at a tertiary care hospital between April 2017 and January 2025. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES). Baseline characteristics and laboratory and endoscopic variables were compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum SAA levels demonstrated strong positive correlations with leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein (LRG) (<i>r</i> = 0.752) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (<i>r</i> = 0.717). Significant associations were also observed between SAA and MES, Mayo score, partial Mayo score, and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) (all <i>P</i> < .01). SAA identified active endoscopic inflammation (MES ≥ 2) at a cutoff value of 4.1 mg/L, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813 (95% CI, 0.731-0.894), sensitivity of 0.804, and specificity of 0.741. In addition, SAA differentiated MES 0 from MES 1 at a cutoff value of 2.6 mg/L, yielding an AUC of 0.683 (95% CI, 0.470-0.897), sensitivity of 0.706, and specificity of 0.714.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAA exhibits diagnostic performance comparable to, and in some respects exceeding, that of established inflammatory biomarkers in UC. Importantly, SAA effectively discriminates between MES 0 and MES 1, supporting its potential role as a sensitive marker of mucosal healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"8 3","pages":"otag097"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13570589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otag097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endoscopy is the standard for assessing mucosal activity in ulcerative colitis (UC), but reliable biomarkers are needed. This study evaluated serum amyloid A (SAA) as a potential biomarker by comparing it with established markers in UC.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 182 patients with UC who underwent blood and stool testing within 14 days of colonoscopy at a tertiary care hospital between April 2017 and January 2025. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES). Baseline characteristics and laboratory and endoscopic variables were compared across groups.
Results: Serum SAA levels demonstrated strong positive correlations with leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein (LRG) (r = 0.752) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0.717). Significant associations were also observed between SAA and MES, Mayo score, partial Mayo score, and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) (all P < .01). SAA identified active endoscopic inflammation (MES ≥ 2) at a cutoff value of 4.1 mg/L, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813 (95% CI, 0.731-0.894), sensitivity of 0.804, and specificity of 0.741. In addition, SAA differentiated MES 0 from MES 1 at a cutoff value of 2.6 mg/L, yielding an AUC of 0.683 (95% CI, 0.470-0.897), sensitivity of 0.706, and specificity of 0.714.
Conclusions: SAA exhibits diagnostic performance comparable to, and in some respects exceeding, that of established inflammatory biomarkers in UC. Importantly, SAA effectively discriminates between MES 0 and MES 1, supporting its potential role as a sensitive marker of mucosal healing.