Consensus statement for managing patients with ARDS in low-resource settings: a Delphi study.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2026-08-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100144
Pedja Kovacevic, Jesús Villar, Boris Tomic, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Giacomo Grasselli, Luigi Camporota, Marlies Ostermann, Ivan Palibrk, Rajesh Mishra, Sasa Dragic, Jose Diaz-Gomez, Danica Momcicevic, Ali Ait Hssain, Biljana Zlojutro, Jihad Mallat, Milka Jandric, Owoniya Temitope, Roman Zahorec, Omar Shahed, Mohamed Boussarsar, F Joachim Meyer, Ahmed Mukhtar, Marko Kutlesa, Vladimir Krajinovic, John Laffey, Radmilo Jankovic, Samir Jaber, Dejan Markovic, Oluwayemisi Esther Ekor, Rotimi Muyiwa, Rihard Knafelj, Matija Jurjevic, Natasa Milivojevic, Ahmed El Masry, Jasminka Persec, Anusha Cherian, Younes Aissaoui, Oguz Kilickaya, Kent Doi, Daniel Lovric, Wael Alqassem, Natasa Gocic, Aderonke Adesiyan, Reuben Okioma, Ayalew Zewdie, Mumbere Kigayi Jean Pierre, Subhash Acharya, Ognjen Gajic
{"title":"Consensus statement for managing patients with ARDS in low-resource settings: a Delphi study.","authors":"Pedja Kovacevic, Jesús Villar, Boris Tomic, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Giacomo Grasselli, Luigi Camporota, Marlies Ostermann, Ivan Palibrk, Rajesh Mishra, Sasa Dragic, Jose Diaz-Gomez, Danica Momcicevic, Ali Ait Hssain, Biljana Zlojutro, Jihad Mallat, Milka Jandric, Owoniya Temitope, Roman Zahorec, Omar Shahed, Mohamed Boussarsar, F Joachim Meyer, Ahmed Mukhtar, Marko Kutlesa, Vladimir Krajinovic, John Laffey, Radmilo Jankovic, Samir Jaber, Dejan Markovic, Oluwayemisi Esther Ekor, Rotimi Muyiwa, Rihard Knafelj, Matija Jurjevic, Natasa Milivojevic, Ahmed El Masry, Jasminka Persec, Anusha Cherian, Younes Aissaoui, Oguz Kilickaya, Kent Doi, Daniel Lovric, Wael Alqassem, Natasa Gocic, Aderonke Adesiyan, Reuben Okioma, Ayalew Zewdie, Mumbere Kigayi Jean Pierre, Subhash Acharya, Ognjen Gajic","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite decades of research and advances in critical care, mortality of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) remains high, ranging from 30 to 45% in high-income countries and markedly higher in low-resource settings (LRS), where management guidelines implementation is constrained. An international consensus aimed to provide statements for ARDS management tailored to LRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Since management of critically ill patients is a major public health problem in LRS, the Bosnia and Herzegovina Society of Intensive Care Medicine convened an international, multidisciplinary Steering Committee with expertise in ARDS management. The committee appointed an international panel of clinicians and investigators specialized in the field of ARDS. Through an iterative Delphi process, a panel of 52 experts developed several consensus statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After three Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on 44 out of 56 of statements (79%). The survey covered eight domains related to ARDS management in LRS related to: critical care infrastructure, diagnostic tools, respiratory support, other supportive therapies, sedation strategies, weaning, nutrition, and management of complications. Statements were compared with recent ESICM guidelines, highlighting specific LRS considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the Delphi method, international experts developed clinical practice statements guiding clinicians on ARDS management in LRS. These statements complemented existing guidelines by addressing areas where evidence is limited, and highlight aspects of ARDS management pertinent for LRS not covered by current international recommendations. Future studies are needed to evaluate the adherence and impact of these statements and to address remaining uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100144"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13564132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100144","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite decades of research and advances in critical care, mortality of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) remains high, ranging from 30 to 45% in high-income countries and markedly higher in low-resource settings (LRS), where management guidelines implementation is constrained. An international consensus aimed to provide statements for ARDS management tailored to LRS.

Methods: Since management of critically ill patients is a major public health problem in LRS, the Bosnia and Herzegovina Society of Intensive Care Medicine convened an international, multidisciplinary Steering Committee with expertise in ARDS management. The committee appointed an international panel of clinicians and investigators specialized in the field of ARDS. Through an iterative Delphi process, a panel of 52 experts developed several consensus statements.

Results: After three Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on 44 out of 56 of statements (79%). The survey covered eight domains related to ARDS management in LRS related to: critical care infrastructure, diagnostic tools, respiratory support, other supportive therapies, sedation strategies, weaning, nutrition, and management of complications. Statements were compared with recent ESICM guidelines, highlighting specific LRS considerations.

Conclusion: Using the Delphi method, international experts developed clinical practice statements guiding clinicians on ARDS management in LRS. These statements complemented existing guidelines by addressing areas where evidence is limited, and highlight aspects of ARDS management pertinent for LRS not covered by current international recommendations. Future studies are needed to evaluate the adherence and impact of these statements and to address remaining uncertainties.

在低资源环境下管理ARDS患者的共识声明:德尔菲研究。
背景:尽管在重症监护方面进行了数十年的研究和进展,急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的死亡率仍然很高,在高收入国家从30%到45%不等,在资源匮乏的国家(LRS)明显更高,在这些国家,管理指南的实施受到限制。一项国际共识旨在提供适合LRS的ARDS管理声明。方法:由于重症患者的管理是LRS的主要公共卫生问题,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那重症医学学会召集了一个具有ARDS管理专业知识的国际多学科指导委员会。该委员会任命了一个由ARDS领域的临床医生和研究人员组成的国际小组。通过反复的德尔菲过程,一个由52名专家组成的小组制定了几项共识声明。结果:经过三轮德尔菲,56个陈述中有44个(79%)达成共识。调查涵盖了与LRS ARDS管理相关的八个领域,涉及:重症监护基础设施、诊断工具、呼吸支持、其他支持性治疗、镇静策略、断奶、营养和并发症管理。声明与最近的ESICM指南进行了比较,突出了具体的LRS考虑因素。结论:采用德尔菲法,国际专家制定了临床实践声明,指导临床医生对LRS的ARDS管理。这些声明补充了现有指南,解决了证据有限的领域,并强调了与LRS相关的ARDS管理方面,这些方面未被当前的国际建议所涵盖。未来的研究需要评估这些声明的依从性和影响,并解决剩余的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书