Driving Factors of Macroplastic Dynamics in Rivers: A Global Review

IF 4.5 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ACS ES&T water Pub Date : 2026-09-11 Epub Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.6c00608
Rose Boahemaa Pinto, Tim H. M. van Emmerik, Martine van der Ploeg, Giulia Cesarini
{"title":"Driving Factors of Macroplastic Dynamics in Rivers: A Global Review","authors":"Rose Boahemaa Pinto,&nbsp;Tim H. M. van Emmerik,&nbsp;Martine van der Ploeg,&nbsp;Giulia Cesarini","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.6c00608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding riverine macroplastic dynamics is critical,\r\nas rivers\r\nare the main pathways transferring land-based plastics to the ocean,\r\ncontributing to global marine pollution. This review synthesizes current\r\nresearch on the environmental factors controlling macroplastic dynamics\r\nin rivers, including hydrometeorological (e.g., rainfall, discharge),\r\nanthropogenic (e.g., mismanaged plastic waste, population density),\r\nand river characteristics (geographical features, e.g., riparian vegetation,\r\nslope, and man-made, e.g., dam, weir). A systematic literature search\r\nidentified 193 studies, which were classified into ten relationship\r\ntypes for cross-study comparison. Our analysis reveals a strong research\r\nbias toward hydrometeorological drivers (53.7%), with fewer studies\r\naddressing anthropogenic or river characteristics (23.1% each). Environmental\r\ndrivers are investigated unevenly across macroplastic transport phases,\r\nwith hydrometeorological variables primarily linked to movement, anthropogenic\r\nfactors to input, and river characteristics to both movement and accumulation.\r\nHowever, these relationships remain inconsistent across studies due\r\nto methodological and environmental differences. Importantly, a large\r\nproportion of studies rely on qualitative or descriptive approaches,\r\nwith limited use of statistical testing to quantitatively evaluate\r\ndriver–transport relationships. Geographic imbalances were\r\nalso evident, with most research focused on Europe and Asia. This\r\nreview highlights the need for more quantitative, evidence-based research\r\nto establish globally applicable links between environmental factors\r\nand riverine macroplastic pollution.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"6 9","pages":"5538–5552"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.6c00608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding riverine macroplastic dynamics is critical, as rivers are the main pathways transferring land-based plastics to the ocean, contributing to global marine pollution. This review synthesizes current research on the environmental factors controlling macroplastic dynamics in rivers, including hydrometeorological (e.g., rainfall, discharge), anthropogenic (e.g., mismanaged plastic waste, population density), and river characteristics (geographical features, e.g., riparian vegetation, slope, and man-made, e.g., dam, weir). A systematic literature search identified 193 studies, which were classified into ten relationship types for cross-study comparison. Our analysis reveals a strong research bias toward hydrometeorological drivers (53.7%), with fewer studies addressing anthropogenic or river characteristics (23.1% each). Environmental drivers are investigated unevenly across macroplastic transport phases, with hydrometeorological variables primarily linked to movement, anthropogenic factors to input, and river characteristics to both movement and accumulation. However, these relationships remain inconsistent across studies due to methodological and environmental differences. Importantly, a large proportion of studies rely on qualitative or descriptive approaches, with limited use of statistical testing to quantitatively evaluate driver–transport relationships. Geographic imbalances were also evident, with most research focused on Europe and Asia. This review highlights the need for more quantitative, evidence-based research to establish globally applicable links between environmental factors and riverine macroplastic pollution.

河流宏观塑性动力学的驱动因素:全球综述
了解河流宏观塑性动力学至关重要,因为河流是将陆地塑料转移到海洋的主要途径,导致全球海洋污染。本文综述了控制河流宏观塑性动力学的环境因素的研究现状,包括水文气象因素(如降雨、排放)、人为因素(如塑料废弃物管理不善、人口密度)和河流特征(地理特征,如河岸植被、坡度和人为因素,如大坝、堰)。一项系统的文献检索确定了193项研究,并将其分为十种关系类型进行交叉研究比较。我们的分析显示,对水文气象驱动因素的研究有很强的倾向性(53.7%),对人为或河流特征的研究较少(各23.1%)。在宏观塑性运输阶段,环境驱动因素的研究不均匀,水文气象变量主要与运动有关,人为因素与输入有关,河流特征与运动和积累有关。然而,由于方法和环境的差异,这些关系在研究中仍然不一致。重要的是,很大一部分研究依赖于定性或描述性方法,有限地使用统计测试来定量评估河流运输关系。地理上的不平衡也很明显,大多数研究都集中在欧洲和亚洲。这篇综述强调需要更多的定量的、基于证据的研究来建立环境因素和河流宏观塑料污染之间全球适用的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书