Breast Cancer Method of Detection: Screening Associated With Favorable Tumor Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival Across Age Groups.

Babita Panigrahi, Alexandra DiTommaso, Naveen Ghuman, Kelly S Myers, Lisa A Mullen, Emily B Ambinder, Eniola T Oluyemi
{"title":"Breast Cancer Method of Detection: Screening Associated With Favorable Tumor Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival Across Age Groups.","authors":"Babita Panigrahi, Alexandra DiTommaso, Naveen Ghuman, Kelly S Myers, Lisa A Mullen, Emily B Ambinder, Eniola T Oluyemi","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2026.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast cancer method of detection (MOD) describes how a cancer is first identified: through screening or nonscreening (symptomatic or incidental) presentation. We examined associations between MOD and patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included women ≥40 years diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2019 and December 2021, with follow-up through July 2026. MOD was classified as screen-detected or non-screen-detected cancer. Logistic regression and χ<sup>2</sup> tests evaluated associations with patient, tumor, and treatment variables. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression assessed all-cause survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,023 women (mean age 63.5 ± 12.1 years), screen-detected cancers (n = 710, 69.4%) had more favorable characteristics: earlier T stage (T0: 26.3% versus 5.4%, P < .001), negative lymph nodes (N0: 85.5% versus 59.1%, P < .001), fewer metastases (M0: 98.6% versus 82.4%, P < .001), and lower grade (grade 1: 18.6% versus 7.4%, P < .001). More received lumpectomy (72.1% versus 50.2%, P < .001) and fewer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5.2% versus 22.5%, P < .001). Non-screen-detected cancers were more common among the unemployed (21.0% versus 14.0%, P = .001), uninsured (3.8% versus 1.7%, P = .026), and women ≥ 75 years (23.3% versus 16.1%, P = .019). Within non-screen-detected cancers, tumor stage worsened with time since last negative screen (P < .001). Screen-detected cancers showed superior all-cause survival (5-year survival: 92.9% versus 73.6%, P < .001). After adjustment, screen detection was independently associated with 43% lower mortality (hazard ratio = 0.57, P = .003). Significant survival benefit persisted in women ≥ 75 years (hazard ratio = 0.44, P = .014).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Screen-detected breast cancers were associated with favorable biology, less aggressive treatment, and improved survival. These findings can inform screening guidelines and underscore the importance of incorporating MOD into cancer registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2026.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer method of detection (MOD) describes how a cancer is first identified: through screening or nonscreening (symptomatic or incidental) presentation. We examined associations between MOD and patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women ≥40 years diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2019 and December 2021, with follow-up through July 2026. MOD was classified as screen-detected or non-screen-detected cancer. Logistic regression and χ2 tests evaluated associations with patient, tumor, and treatment variables. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression assessed all-cause survival.

Results: Among 1,023 women (mean age 63.5 ± 12.1 years), screen-detected cancers (n = 710, 69.4%) had more favorable characteristics: earlier T stage (T0: 26.3% versus 5.4%, P < .001), negative lymph nodes (N0: 85.5% versus 59.1%, P < .001), fewer metastases (M0: 98.6% versus 82.4%, P < .001), and lower grade (grade 1: 18.6% versus 7.4%, P < .001). More received lumpectomy (72.1% versus 50.2%, P < .001) and fewer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5.2% versus 22.5%, P < .001). Non-screen-detected cancers were more common among the unemployed (21.0% versus 14.0%, P = .001), uninsured (3.8% versus 1.7%, P = .026), and women ≥ 75 years (23.3% versus 16.1%, P = .019). Within non-screen-detected cancers, tumor stage worsened with time since last negative screen (P < .001). Screen-detected cancers showed superior all-cause survival (5-year survival: 92.9% versus 73.6%, P < .001). After adjustment, screen detection was independently associated with 43% lower mortality (hazard ratio = 0.57, P = .003). Significant survival benefit persisted in women ≥ 75 years (hazard ratio = 0.44, P = .014).

Discussion: Screen-detected breast cancers were associated with favorable biology, less aggressive treatment, and improved survival. These findings can inform screening guidelines and underscore the importance of incorporating MOD into cancer registries.

乳腺癌的检测方法:筛查与有利的肿瘤特征,治疗和跨年龄组的生存。
目的:乳腺癌检测方法(MOD)描述了如何首先识别癌症:通过筛查或非筛查(症状/偶然)表现。我们研究了MOD与患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、治疗模式和生存率之间的关系。方法:该回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年1月至2021年12月期间诊断为乳腺癌的≥40岁女性,随访至2026年7月。MOD分为屏幕检测和非屏幕检测。Logistic回归和卡方检验评估了患者、肿瘤和治疗变量之间的相关性。Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox回归评估全因生存率。结果:在1023名女性(平均年龄63.5±12.1岁)中,筛查检测到的癌症(n=710, 69.4%)具有更有利的特征:早期T期(T0: 26.3% vs. 5.4%, p)讨论:筛查检测到的乳腺癌与良好的生物学,较少的积极治疗和改善的生存率相关。这些发现可以为筛查指南提供信息,并强调将MOD纳入癌症登记的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书