2026 Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christian Martin-Gill, P Daniel Patterson, Christopher T Richards, Samuel T Bishop, Benjamin T Potts, Rebecca E Cash
{"title":"2026 Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care.","authors":"Christian Martin-Gill, P Daniel Patterson, Christopher T Richards, Samuel T Bishop, Benjamin T Potts, Rebecca E Cash","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2026.2731488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) are widely regarded as a valuable means of translating scientific evidence to clinical practice. Efforts continue to promote the development and implementation of new EBGs across all aspects of emergency medical services (EMS), but with variable quality and gaps in the content addressed by existing EBGs. We performed a biennial systematic review of prehospital EBGs to identify and assess the quality of EBGs published between 2023 and 2025 that can inform prehospital clinical care and operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a systematic review study design and searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL from January 1, 2023, to May 21, 2025, for prehospital EBGs providing recommendations following an organized review of relevant literature. We appraised the quality of published EBGs with adapted criteria of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 71 new EBGs were identified. These addressed a variety of EMS clinical and operational topics. Most EBGs (<i>n</i> = 67, 94.4%) addressed clinical topics of EMS medicine, with a focus on time-life critical conditions (<i>n</i> = 45, 63.4%), along with injury and special clinical considerations (<i>n</i> = 37, 52.1% each). About half (<i>n</i> = 37, 52.1%) met all adapted NAM criteria for high-quality EBGs, of which 32 (86.5%) represented compilations of guidelines related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emergency cardiovascular care, and trauma. The mean AGREE II overall domain score was 70.9% (SD 11.4%), and 30 (42.3%) EBGs had an average domain score above 75%. These 71 new EBGs demonstrated incremental improvement in the NAM criteria and AGREE II scoring compared to the 178 EBGs identified in previous reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This updated systematic review identified many published EBGs intended for EMS. These EBGs were overall of higher quality than those previously published, and their appraisal continues to yield important findings that can serve to inform guideline developers on how to continually improve the quality of prehospital EBGs. The high-quality EBGs identified in this review should serve as targets to promote the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based recommendations, inform prehospital protocol development, and guide the initial certification and continuing education of EMS personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2026.2731488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) are widely regarded as a valuable means of translating scientific evidence to clinical practice. Efforts continue to promote the development and implementation of new EBGs across all aspects of emergency medical services (EMS), but with variable quality and gaps in the content addressed by existing EBGs. We performed a biennial systematic review of prehospital EBGs to identify and assess the quality of EBGs published between 2023 and 2025 that can inform prehospital clinical care and operations.

Methods: We used a systematic review study design and searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL from January 1, 2023, to May 21, 2025, for prehospital EBGs providing recommendations following an organized review of relevant literature. We appraised the quality of published EBGs with adapted criteria of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool.

Results: In total, 71 new EBGs were identified. These addressed a variety of EMS clinical and operational topics. Most EBGs (n = 67, 94.4%) addressed clinical topics of EMS medicine, with a focus on time-life critical conditions (n = 45, 63.4%), along with injury and special clinical considerations (n = 37, 52.1% each). About half (n = 37, 52.1%) met all adapted NAM criteria for high-quality EBGs, of which 32 (86.5%) represented compilations of guidelines related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emergency cardiovascular care, and trauma. The mean AGREE II overall domain score was 70.9% (SD 11.4%), and 30 (42.3%) EBGs had an average domain score above 75%. These 71 new EBGs demonstrated incremental improvement in the NAM criteria and AGREE II scoring compared to the 178 EBGs identified in previous reviews.

Conclusions: This updated systematic review identified many published EBGs intended for EMS. These EBGs were overall of higher quality than those previously published, and their appraisal continues to yield important findings that can serve to inform guideline developers on how to continually improve the quality of prehospital EBGs. The high-quality EBGs identified in this review should serve as targets to promote the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based recommendations, inform prehospital protocol development, and guide the initial certification and continuing education of EMS personnel.

2026院前护理循证指南系统评价。
目的:循证指南(EBGs)被广泛认为是将科学证据转化为临床实践的有价值的手段。继续努力促进在紧急医疗服务的各个方面制定和实施新的EBGs,但现有EBGs的质量参差不齐,内容也存在差距。我们对院前ebg进行了两年一次的系统回顾,以确定和评估2023年至2025年间发表的ebg的质量,这些ebg可以为院前临床护理和手术提供信息。方法:我们采用系统回顾研究设计,检索Ovid Medline、EMBASE和CINAHL,检索时间为2023年1月1日至2025年5月21日,通过对相关文献的有组织回顾,获得院前EBGs的建议。我们采用美国国家医学院(NAM)的改编标准和研究与评价指南(AGREE) II工具评估已发表的EBGs的质量。结果:共发现71例新的EBGs。这些讨论了各种EMS临床和操作主题。大多数EBGs (n = 67, 94.4%)涉及EMS医学的临床主题,重点关注时间-生命危重症(n = 45, 63.4%),以及损伤和特殊临床考虑(n = 37,各占52.1%)。约一半(n = 37, 52.1%)符合所有适用于高质量心电图的NAM标准,其中32例(86.5%)是心肺复苏、心血管急救和创伤相关指南的汇编。平均AGREE II总体域评分为70.9% (SD 11.4%), 30个EBGs(42.3%)的平均域评分高于75%。这71个新的ebg在NAM标准和AGREE II评分方面表现出了与之前审查中确定的178个ebg相比的渐进式改进。结论:这一更新的系统评价确定了许多已发表的用于EMS的EBGs。这些心电图总体上比以前发表的心电图质量更高,他们的评估继续产生重要的发现,可以为指南的制定者提供如何不断提高院前心电图质量的信息。本综述中确定的高质量EBGs应作为促进循证建议的传播和实施的目标,为院前协议的制定提供信息,并指导EMS人员的初始认证和继续教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书