Trust, Advocacy, Inequity, and Information: A Qualitative Study of PICU Communication Experiences Among Low-Income Families in the United States.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Emily Kemper, Michelle N Eakin, Jinnesse Taylor, Sapna R Kudchadkar
{"title":"Trust, Advocacy, Inequity, and Information: A Qualitative Study of PICU Communication Experiences Among Low-Income Families in the United States.","authors":"Emily Kemper, Michelle N Eakin, Jinnesse Taylor, Sapna R Kudchadkar","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000004053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Communication challenges and barriers are common during PICU stays, but prior studies have rarely focused on historically marginalized groups such as families with low socioeconomic status and families of color. We aimed to characterize these experiences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted from October 2023 to April 2025. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, analyzed, and coded using a constant comparative method.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A PICU at a tertiary-care academic center in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventeen families, including 13 mothers, 7 fathers, and 2 grandparents of children with income-based Medicaid insurance admitted to the PICU for at least 5 days.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Thirteen of 22 interviewees were Black, African American, or Multiracial, 7 were White, and 2 did not indicate race. Major themes included 1) healthcare team behaviors that build or lose family trust; 2) importance of parental advocacy and valuing parent perspective; 3) intersection of race and healthcare experience; and 4) diverse preferences for obtaining information. Families' trust in their healthcare team was influenced by both medical and socioemotional behaviors. Parents desired recognition as experts in their child and trusted the team more when their perspective was included. For some families, experiences with discrimination impacted their trust levels and care experiences. Finally, families obtained information from PICU structures such as rounds but also sought a variety of other sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This interview study characterized PICU communication experiences among low-income families with diverse representation. Our findings identified how communication behaviors can build and erode family trust in the healthcare team. We also elicited preferences for obtaining information, which could inform interventions to improve information sharing. Future research on how to develop and assess interventions that improve family trust and satisfaction in inpatient care is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000004053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Communication challenges and barriers are common during PICU stays, but prior studies have rarely focused on historically marginalized groups such as families with low socioeconomic status and families of color. We aimed to characterize these experiences.

Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted from October 2023 to April 2025. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, analyzed, and coded using a constant comparative method.

Setting: A PICU at a tertiary-care academic center in the United States.

Participants: Seventeen families, including 13 mothers, 7 fathers, and 2 grandparents of children with income-based Medicaid insurance admitted to the PICU for at least 5 days.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Thirteen of 22 interviewees were Black, African American, or Multiracial, 7 were White, and 2 did not indicate race. Major themes included 1) healthcare team behaviors that build or lose family trust; 2) importance of parental advocacy and valuing parent perspective; 3) intersection of race and healthcare experience; and 4) diverse preferences for obtaining information. Families' trust in their healthcare team was influenced by both medical and socioemotional behaviors. Parents desired recognition as experts in their child and trusted the team more when their perspective was included. For some families, experiences with discrimination impacted their trust levels and care experiences. Finally, families obtained information from PICU structures such as rounds but also sought a variety of other sources.

Conclusions: This interview study characterized PICU communication experiences among low-income families with diverse representation. Our findings identified how communication behaviors can build and erode family trust in the healthcare team. We also elicited preferences for obtaining information, which could inform interventions to improve information sharing. Future research on how to develop and assess interventions that improve family trust and satisfaction in inpatient care is needed.

信任、倡导、不公平与信息:美国低收入家庭PICU沟通经验的定性研究。
目的:在PICU期间,沟通挑战和障碍是常见的,但先前的研究很少关注历史上被边缘化的群体,如低社会经济地位的家庭和有色人种家庭。我们的目标是描述这些经历。设计:半结构化访谈于2023年10月至2025年4月进行。访谈录音,逐字抄写,分析,并使用恒定的比较方法编码。环境:美国某三级医疗学术中心的PICU。参与者:17个家庭,包括13名母亲,7名父亲和2名祖父母,他们的孩子有收入医疗补助保险,在PICU住了至少5天。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:22位受访者中有13位是黑人、非裔美国人或多种族,7位是白人,2位没有指明种族。主要主题包括:1)建立或失去家庭信任的医疗团队行为;2)家长倡导和重视家长观点的重要性;3)种族与医疗保健经验的交集;4)获取信息的不同偏好。家庭对医疗团队的信任受到医疗行为和社会情绪行为的影响。父母希望自己的孩子被认可为专家,当他们的观点被纳入时,他们会更加信任团队。对于一些家庭来说,歧视的经历影响了他们的信任水平和护理经历。最后,家庭从PICU结构(如查房)获取信息,但也寻求各种其他来源。结论:本访谈研究描述了不同代表的低收入家庭PICU沟通经历。我们的研究结果确定了沟通行为如何建立和削弱家庭对医疗团队的信任。我们还激发了获取信息的偏好,这可以为干预措施提供信息共享。如何开发和评估干预措施,提高家庭信任和满意度的住院护理是未来的研究需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书