Family Distress Related to Death Rattle and Agonal Breathing: A Nationwide Post-bereavement Survey

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sena Yamamoto RN, PhD, Tatsuya Morita MD, Harue Arao RN, PhD, Hiroyuki Otani MD, PhD, Maho Aoyama RN, PhD, Masanori Mori MD, Satoru Tsuneto MD, PhD, Mitsunori Miyashita RN, PhD
{"title":"Family Distress Related to Death Rattle and Agonal Breathing: A Nationwide Post-bereavement Survey","authors":"Sena Yamamoto RN, PhD,&nbsp;Tatsuya Morita MD,&nbsp;Harue Arao RN, PhD,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Otani MD, PhD,&nbsp;Maho Aoyama RN, PhD,&nbsp;Masanori Mori MD,&nbsp;Satoru Tsuneto MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mitsunori Miyashita RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2026.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Death rattle and agonal breathing are distressing for most families. Healthcare providers often explain these signs as a part of the natural dying process.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to screen for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to death rattle and agonal breathing among bereaved families, and to explore factors associated with positive screening results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A nationwide, cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire among bereaved families of patients who died of cancer at 140 palliative care units/inpatient hospices in Japan. PTSD was screened based on reported re-experiencing symptoms using the PTSD 3-Item Brief Screening. The degree of distress caused by death rattle and agonal breathing, whether they had received explanations of these signs, and how they perceived the signs were also assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1068 available responses, 311 and 392 participants recognized death rattle and agonal breathing, respectively. The proportion screened positive was 26.9% for death rattle and 26.0% for agonal breathing among participants who perceived that these signs had been very distressing. Participants with greater distress due to death rattle and agonal breathing were significantly more likely to have PTSD symptoms (odds ratios: 2.07 and 1.89, respectively). The provision of an explanation was significantly associated with greater acceptance of these signs as a part of the natural dying process, but was not a significant variable for screening results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bereaved family members exposed to death rattle and agonal breathing may have PTSD symptoms. Communication and care strategies to address family distress are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"72 6","pages":"Pages 742-751"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392426009735","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Death rattle and agonal breathing are distressing for most families. Healthcare providers often explain these signs as a part of the natural dying process.

Objectives

This study aimed to screen for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to death rattle and agonal breathing among bereaved families, and to explore factors associated with positive screening results.

Methods

A nationwide, cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire among bereaved families of patients who died of cancer at 140 palliative care units/inpatient hospices in Japan. PTSD was screened based on reported re-experiencing symptoms using the PTSD 3-Item Brief Screening. The degree of distress caused by death rattle and agonal breathing, whether they had received explanations of these signs, and how they perceived the signs were also assessed.

Results

Of the 1068 available responses, 311 and 392 participants recognized death rattle and agonal breathing, respectively. The proportion screened positive was 26.9% for death rattle and 26.0% for agonal breathing among participants who perceived that these signs had been very distressing. Participants with greater distress due to death rattle and agonal breathing were significantly more likely to have PTSD symptoms (odds ratios: 2.07 and 1.89, respectively). The provision of an explanation was significantly associated with greater acceptance of these signs as a part of the natural dying process, but was not a significant variable for screening results.

Conclusion

Bereaved family members exposed to death rattle and agonal breathing may have PTSD symptoms. Communication and care strategies to address family distress are needed.
与死亡喋喋不休和呼吸困难有关的家庭痛苦:一项全国性的丧亲后调查。
背景:死亡的声音和痛苦的呼吸对大多数家庭来说都是痛苦的。医疗保健提供者经常将这些迹象解释为自然死亡过程的一部分。目的:本研究旨在筛查与死亡喋喋不休和呼吸困难相关的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),并探讨筛查阳性结果的相关因素。方法:在日本140个姑息治疗单位/住院安宁疗护所的癌症患者家属中,采用自填问卷,进行一项全国性的横断面研究。创伤后应激障碍是根据报告的再经历症状使用创伤后应激障碍3项简短筛选。研究人员还评估了死亡时发出的嘎嘎声和呼吸急促所造成的痛苦程度,他们是否得到了对这些迹象的解释,以及他们如何感知这些迹象。结果:在1068份可用的回复中,311名和392名参与者分别识别出死亡嘎嘎声和呼吸急促。在那些认为这些迹象非常令人痛苦的参与者中,死亡嘎嘎声筛查阳性的比例为26.9%,呼吸困难筛查阳性的比例为26.0%。因死亡时发出的颤音和呼吸急促而感到更大痛苦的参与者更有可能出现PTSD症状(比值比分别为2.07和1.89)。提供解释与更多人接受这些迹象作为自然死亡过程的一部分显著相关,但对筛选结果不是一个显著变量。结论:死者家属暴露于死亡声和呼吸急促可能有PTSD症状。需要沟通和护理战略来解决家庭痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书