Influencing factors and prediction model of ultrasound-based false-negative central lymph node metastasis in localized papillary thyroid carcinoma.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2026-08-31 Epub Date: 2026-07-09 DOI:10.21037/gs-2026-1-0129
Ningning Ren, Xiaoyi Ren, Xingsong Tian
{"title":"Influencing factors and prediction model of ultrasound-based false-negative central lymph node metastasis in localized papillary thyroid carcinoma.","authors":"Ningning Ren, Xiaoyi Ren, Xingsong Tian","doi":"10.21037/gs-2026-1-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) exhibited a high false-negative rate for central lymph nodes (CLNs), with unknown influencing factors and predictive models. This study aimed to identify risk factors for false-negative CLN findings in a cohort study and to develop a predictive model to support clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included patients admitted to the Breast and Thyroid Surgery Department of Shandong Provincial Hospital, China, between January 2013 and December 2023. All patients included in the study were confirmed to papillary thyroid cancer (TC) based on postoperative paraffin-embedded pathology. False-negative CLNs refers to metastasis undetected by preoperative ultrasound but confirmed postoperatively by pathology. Logistic regression, forest graph and nomogram were used to calculate and display statistical difference between influencing factors and the false-negative rate of CLNs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,614 patients with papillary TC [44.19±11.14 years, 4,469 women (79.6%)] were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis showed that gender [odds ratio (OR): 1.832, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.570-2.137, P<0.001], chronic disease (OR: 0.655, 95% CI: 0.552-0.778, P<0.001), diameter of malignant thyroid nodules under ultrasound (OR: 1.816, 95% CI: 1.511-2.182, P<0.001), diameter of CLNs under ultrasound (OR: 1.404, 95% CI: 1.074-1.836, P=0.01), enlargement of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) under ultrasound (OR: 1.550, 95% CI: 1.213-1.980, P<0.001), diameter of LLN under ultrasound (OR: 0.645, 95% CI: 0.435-0.956, P=0.03) were statistically significant preoperative influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cohort study indicated that the false-negative rate of CLNs was quite common. Personalized preventive CLN dissection was suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"15 8","pages":"231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13561624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2026-1-0129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) exhibited a high false-negative rate for central lymph nodes (CLNs), with unknown influencing factors and predictive models. This study aimed to identify risk factors for false-negative CLN findings in a cohort study and to develop a predictive model to support clinical decision-making.

Methods: This cohort study included patients admitted to the Breast and Thyroid Surgery Department of Shandong Provincial Hospital, China, between January 2013 and December 2023. All patients included in the study were confirmed to papillary thyroid cancer (TC) based on postoperative paraffin-embedded pathology. False-negative CLNs refers to metastasis undetected by preoperative ultrasound but confirmed postoperatively by pathology. Logistic regression, forest graph and nomogram were used to calculate and display statistical difference between influencing factors and the false-negative rate of CLNs.

Results: A total of 5,614 patients with papillary TC [44.19±11.14 years, 4,469 women (79.6%)] were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis showed that gender [odds ratio (OR): 1.832, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.570-2.137, P<0.001], chronic disease (OR: 0.655, 95% CI: 0.552-0.778, P<0.001), diameter of malignant thyroid nodules under ultrasound (OR: 1.816, 95% CI: 1.511-2.182, P<0.001), diameter of CLNs under ultrasound (OR: 1.404, 95% CI: 1.074-1.836, P=0.01), enlargement of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) under ultrasound (OR: 1.550, 95% CI: 1.213-1.980, P<0.001), diameter of LLN under ultrasound (OR: 0.645, 95% CI: 0.435-0.956, P=0.03) were statistically significant preoperative influencing factors.

Conclusions: This cohort study indicated that the false-negative rate of CLNs was quite common. Personalized preventive CLN dissection was suggested.

局部甲状腺乳头状癌超声假阴性中央淋巴结转移的影响因素及预测模型
背景:甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者的中央淋巴结(cln)假阴性率高,影响因素和预测模型未知。本研究旨在通过队列研究确定假阴性CLN结果的危险因素,并建立预测模型以支持临床决策。方法:本队列研究纳入2013年1月至2023年12月中国山东省医院乳腺甲状腺外科收治的患者。所有纳入研究的患者均经术后石蜡包埋病理证实为甲状腺乳头状癌(TC)。假阴性cln是指术前超声未发现但术后病理证实的转移。采用Logistic回归、森林图和正态图计算并显示影响因素与cln假阴性率之间的统计学差异。结果:共分析5614例乳头状TC患者[44.19±11.14岁,女性4469例(79.6%)]。Logistic回归分析显示,性别[比值比(OR): 1.832, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.570 ~ 2.137, p]。结论:本队列研究提示,cln假阴性率较为普遍。建议个体化预防性CLN解剖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书