Association between electromyographic and neurophysiological indices and functional and function-related outcomes after lower-limb injury: A three-level meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Junhui Zhu, Yan Bu, Zhongming Song, Ling Xu, Hongxiang Zhang
{"title":"Association between electromyographic and neurophysiological indices and functional and function-related outcomes after lower-limb injury: A three-level meta-analysis.","authors":"Junhui Zhu, Yan Bu, Zhongming Song, Ling Xu, Hongxiang Zhang","doi":"10.1177/10538127261488143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLower-limb sports injuries may leave persistent neuromuscular deficits that conventional functional measures do not fully capture. Surface electromyography (sEMG) and related neurophysiological indices may provide complementary information, but their associations with functional and function-related outcomes remain uncertain.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidance (PROSPERO: CRD420261416860), PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched from inception to 2 May 2026. Eligible studies reported correlations between EMG/neurophysiological indices and functional or function-related outcomes after lower-limb injury. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI checklist. A three-level random-effects model pooled Fisher-transformed correlations while accounting for effect sizes nested within studies. Subgroup analyses were considered exploratory because few independent studies were available.ResultsSix studies contributed 14 effect sizes from 135 participants. The pooled association was moderate and positive (Fisher's Z = 0.536, 95% CI 0.305-0.766, p = 0.003; r = 0.490). The 95% prediction interval was 0.201-0.700, although its stability was limited. The largest descriptive estimates occurred for patellofemoral pain and central activation ratio (both r = 0.715), but both were based on the same two studies and four effect sizes, preventing separation of injury-type and index-class effects. Outcome-type differences were not significant (Q = 0.391, p = 0.823). Leave-one-out estimates remained positive (r = 0.419-0.531). Publication bias could not be assessed reliably.ConclusionEMG/neurophysiological indices may be positively associated with functional and function-related outcomes after lower-limb injury. However, the evidence base is small, subgroup findings are exploratory, and larger prospective studies using standardized protocols are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261488143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261488143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundLower-limb sports injuries may leave persistent neuromuscular deficits that conventional functional measures do not fully capture. Surface electromyography (sEMG) and related neurophysiological indices may provide complementary information, but their associations with functional and function-related outcomes remain uncertain.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidance (PROSPERO: CRD420261416860), PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched from inception to 2 May 2026. Eligible studies reported correlations between EMG/neurophysiological indices and functional or function-related outcomes after lower-limb injury. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI checklist. A three-level random-effects model pooled Fisher-transformed correlations while accounting for effect sizes nested within studies. Subgroup analyses were considered exploratory because few independent studies were available.ResultsSix studies contributed 14 effect sizes from 135 participants. The pooled association was moderate and positive (Fisher's Z = 0.536, 95% CI 0.305-0.766, p = 0.003; r = 0.490). The 95% prediction interval was 0.201-0.700, although its stability was limited. The largest descriptive estimates occurred for patellofemoral pain and central activation ratio (both r = 0.715), but both were based on the same two studies and four effect sizes, preventing separation of injury-type and index-class effects. Outcome-type differences were not significant (Q = 0.391, p = 0.823). Leave-one-out estimates remained positive (r = 0.419-0.531). Publication bias could not be assessed reliably.ConclusionEMG/neurophysiological indices may be positively associated with functional and function-related outcomes after lower-limb injury. However, the evidence base is small, subgroup findings are exploratory, and larger prospective studies using standardized protocols are needed.

下肢损伤后肌电图和神经生理指标与功能和功能相关结果的关联:一项三水平荟萃分析。
背景:下肢运动损伤可能会留下持续的神经肌肉缺陷,而传统的功能测量并不能完全捕捉到这些缺陷。表面肌电图(sEMG)和相关的神经生理指标可能提供补充信息,但它们与功能和功能相关结果的关联仍不确定。方法按照PRISMA的指导(PROSPERO: CRD420261416860),检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library和CNKI自成立至2026年5月2日的文献。符合条件的研究报告了下肢损伤后肌电图/神经生理指标与功能或功能相关结果之间的相关性。使用JBI检查表评估方法学质量。一个三级随机效应模型汇集了费雪转换相关性,同时考虑了研究中嵌套的效应大小。亚组分析被认为是探索性的,因为很少有独立的研究可用。结果6项研究对135名参与者产生了14种效应量。合并相关性为中度正相关(Fisher’s Z = 0.536, 95% CI 0.305-0.766, p = 0.003; r = 0.490)。95%预测区间为0.201 ~ 0.700,但稳定性有限。最大的描述性估计发生在髌股疼痛和中枢激活比(均r = 0.715),但两者都是基于相同的两项研究和四个效应量,没有区分损伤类型和指数级效应。结果型差异无统计学意义(Q = 0.391, p = 0.823)。留一估计仍然是正的(r = 0.419-0.531)。发表偏倚无法可靠评估。结论肌电/神经生理指标可能与下肢损伤后的功能及功能相关预后呈正相关。然而,证据基础小,亚组发现是探索性的,需要使用标准化方案进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书