Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of breast augmentation using implants combined with autologous fat grafting: a retrospective study of 219 cases.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2026-08-31 Epub Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.21037/gs-2026-0389
Phung Van Nguyen, Van Thanh Nguyen
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of breast augmentation using implants combined with autologous fat grafting: a retrospective study of 219 cases.","authors":"Phung Van Nguyen, Van Thanh Nguyen","doi":"10.21037/gs-2026-0389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hybrid breast augmentation-silicone gel implant placement combined with autologous fat grafting-is increasingly used in women with a thin soft-tissue envelope, yet large series from centers outside the groups that first described the technique remain limited. We evaluated the volumetric efficacy, safety, and aesthetic outcomes of hybrid augmentation, and examined whether the size gain explained patient-reported satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 219 women who underwent primary hybrid breast augmentation, with complete 12-month follow-up. Outcomes were the change in breast circumference, patient-reported satisfaction (BREAST-Q Augmentation module, version 2.0; Satisfaction with Breasts domain, scored 0-100), a surgeon-rated aesthetic score, and postoperative complications. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 26.0 using paired t-tests, Fisher's exact test, univariate logistic regression, and Pearson correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breast circumference increased by a mean of 12.6±1.3 cm at 6 months and remained augmented at 12 months (mean gain 10.3±2.5 cm; both P<0.001). BREAST-Q satisfaction rose from a preoperative baseline of 54.4±5.9 to 80.9±5.7 at 6 months and 82.2±5.4 at 12 months (mean improvement +27.8 at 12 months; 95% confidence interval: 26.9-28.8; P<0.001), and surgeon aesthetic scores were consistently high. The overall complication rate was low (5.9%; 13/219); all events were minor, and no Baker grade IV capsular contracture occurred. Patient satisfaction was not explained by the magnitude of the size gain: BREAST-Q was not associated with the increase in circumference at either time point (r=0.05 at 6 months and r=0.06 at 12 months; both P>0.3). No complication occurred among the 33 patients with a smoking history (P=0.23), and body mass index (BMI) was not associated with complications (odds ratio 1.02; P=0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid breast augmentation provided substantial and durable enlargement with a low, exclusively minor complication profile in thin-tissue patients. Because satisfaction was largely independent of the degree of size increase, these findings support prioritizing soft-tissue quality and natural contour over volume alone. In the absence of an implant-only comparison group, these findings characterize outcomes after hybrid augmentation rather than establishing its superiority or the independent contribution of fat grafting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"15 8","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13561599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2026-0389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hybrid breast augmentation-silicone gel implant placement combined with autologous fat grafting-is increasingly used in women with a thin soft-tissue envelope, yet large series from centers outside the groups that first described the technique remain limited. We evaluated the volumetric efficacy, safety, and aesthetic outcomes of hybrid augmentation, and examined whether the size gain explained patient-reported satisfaction.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 219 women who underwent primary hybrid breast augmentation, with complete 12-month follow-up. Outcomes were the change in breast circumference, patient-reported satisfaction (BREAST-Q Augmentation module, version 2.0; Satisfaction with Breasts domain, scored 0-100), a surgeon-rated aesthetic score, and postoperative complications. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 26.0 using paired t-tests, Fisher's exact test, univariate logistic regression, and Pearson correlation.

Results: Breast circumference increased by a mean of 12.6±1.3 cm at 6 months and remained augmented at 12 months (mean gain 10.3±2.5 cm; both P<0.001). BREAST-Q satisfaction rose from a preoperative baseline of 54.4±5.9 to 80.9±5.7 at 6 months and 82.2±5.4 at 12 months (mean improvement +27.8 at 12 months; 95% confidence interval: 26.9-28.8; P<0.001), and surgeon aesthetic scores were consistently high. The overall complication rate was low (5.9%; 13/219); all events were minor, and no Baker grade IV capsular contracture occurred. Patient satisfaction was not explained by the magnitude of the size gain: BREAST-Q was not associated with the increase in circumference at either time point (r=0.05 at 6 months and r=0.06 at 12 months; both P>0.3). No complication occurred among the 33 patients with a smoking history (P=0.23), and body mass index (BMI) was not associated with complications (odds ratio 1.02; P=0.92).

Conclusions: Hybrid breast augmentation provided substantial and durable enlargement with a low, exclusively minor complication profile in thin-tissue patients. Because satisfaction was largely independent of the degree of size increase, these findings support prioritizing soft-tissue quality and natural contour over volume alone. In the absence of an implant-only comparison group, these findings characterize outcomes after hybrid augmentation rather than establishing its superiority or the independent contribution of fat grafting.

219例假体隆胸联合自体脂肪移植术的疗效和安全性评价。
背景:混合型隆胸术——硅胶植入与自体脂肪移植相结合——越来越多地用于软组织包膜较薄的女性,然而,在首次描述该技术的研究小组之外,来自中心的大量研究仍然有限。我们评估了体积的有效性、安全性和混合隆胸的美学结果,并检查了尺寸的增加是否解释了患者报告的满意度。方法:我们回顾性分析了219例接受初次混合型隆胸手术的女性,随访12个月。结果是乳房围度的变化、患者报告的满意度(breast - q隆胸模块,2.0版;乳房满意度,0-100分)、外科医生评定的美学评分和术后并发症。数据分析采用SPSS 26.0版,采用配对t检验、Fisher精确检验、单变量logistic回归和Pearson相关。结果:乳房围围在6个月时平均增加12.6±1.3 cm,在12个月时保持增加(平均增加10.3±2.5 cm,均为0.3)。33例有吸烟史的患者无并发症发生(P=0.23),体重指数(BMI)与并发症无相关性(优势比1.02;P=0.92)。结论:混合型隆胸术为薄组织患者提供了大量持久的隆胸,且并发症发生率低。由于满意度在很大程度上与尺寸增加的程度无关,因此这些发现支持优先考虑软组织质量和自然轮廓而不是体积。在没有单纯植入的对照组的情况下,这些发现描述了混合隆胸后的结果,而不是确定其优势或脂肪移植的独立贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书