Comparison of perioperative outcomes between gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2026-08-31 Epub Date: 2026-07-07 DOI:10.21037/gs-2026-0209
Yesheng Zhang, Yongcan Xu, Yiheng Yang, Xiaoxin Gu, Neng Lou, Guochao Ye
{"title":"Comparison of perioperative outcomes between gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study.","authors":"Yesheng Zhang, Yongcan Xu, Yiheng Yang, Xiaoxin Gu, Neng Lou, Guochao Ye","doi":"10.21037/gs-2026-0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common subtype of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GUA) has been increasingly used because of its cosmetic advantages, but its perioperative outcomes compared with conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), particularly across different body mass index (BMI) categories, remain unclear. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes between GUA and COT and to explore the association between BMI and relevant perioperative indicators in patients with PTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included 411 patients who underwent thyroid surgery at Huzhou Central Hospital between October 1, 2023 and October 1, 2024 and were pathologically confirmed as PTC. Patients were divided into the GUA group and the COT group according to surgical approach. According to the BMI criteria for Asian populations, patients were classified as underweight, normal weight, or overweight/obese. Clinical and perioperative data were collected and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0. Intergroup comparisons, correlation analyses, and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 411 patients, 144 underwent GUA and 267 underwent COT. In both the normal-weight and overweight groups, operative time was significantly longer in the GUA group than in the COT group. In all BMI subgroups, postoperative drainage volume was significantly higher in the GUA group. In the normal-weight and overweight groups, the number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly lower and hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the GUA group. Common postoperative complications were infrequent and comparable between the two groups across BMI strata, while cosmetic satisfaction tended to be higher after GUA. BMI showed only weak correlations with most perioperative indicators; however, in overweight patients, BMI was positively correlated with nodule size. Nodule size was independently associated with pathological N stage [odds ratio (OR) =1.097, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.031-1.169, P=0.004].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with COT, GUA was associated with longer operative time, greater postoperative drainage volume, higher costs, and fewer retrieved lymph nodes, but showed a comparable short-term safety profile in carefully selected patients. BMI was not an independent predictor of pathological N stage, but its association with nodule size in overweight patients suggests a possible relationship between body habitus and tumor burden. BMI, tumor characteristics, safety, cosmetic expectations, and medical cost should be considered when selecting the surgical approach for low-risk PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"15 8","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13561625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2026-0209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common subtype of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GUA) has been increasingly used because of its cosmetic advantages, but its perioperative outcomes compared with conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), particularly across different body mass index (BMI) categories, remain unclear. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes between GUA and COT and to explore the association between BMI and relevant perioperative indicators in patients with PTC.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 411 patients who underwent thyroid surgery at Huzhou Central Hospital between October 1, 2023 and October 1, 2024 and were pathologically confirmed as PTC. Patients were divided into the GUA group and the COT group according to surgical approach. According to the BMI criteria for Asian populations, patients were classified as underweight, normal weight, or overweight/obese. Clinical and perioperative data were collected and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0. Intergroup comparisons, correlation analyses, and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: Among the 411 patients, 144 underwent GUA and 267 underwent COT. In both the normal-weight and overweight groups, operative time was significantly longer in the GUA group than in the COT group. In all BMI subgroups, postoperative drainage volume was significantly higher in the GUA group. In the normal-weight and overweight groups, the number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly lower and hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the GUA group. Common postoperative complications were infrequent and comparable between the two groups across BMI strata, while cosmetic satisfaction tended to be higher after GUA. BMI showed only weak correlations with most perioperative indicators; however, in overweight patients, BMI was positively correlated with nodule size. Nodule size was independently associated with pathological N stage [odds ratio (OR) =1.097, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.031-1.169, P=0.004].

Conclusions: Compared with COT, GUA was associated with longer operative time, greater postoperative drainage volume, higher costs, and fewer retrieved lymph nodes, but showed a comparable short-term safety profile in carefully selected patients. BMI was not an independent predictor of pathological N stage, but its association with nodule size in overweight patients suggests a possible relationship between body habitus and tumor burden. BMI, tumor characteristics, safety, cosmetic expectations, and medical cost should be considered when selecting the surgical approach for low-risk PTC.

无气腹经腋窝内镜甲状腺切除术与常规开放式甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌围手术期疗效的回顾性比较。
背景:甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)是分化型甲状腺癌中最常见的亚型。无气腹经腋窝内窥镜甲状腺切除术(GUA)因其美容优势而越来越多地使用,但与传统开放式甲状腺切除术(COT)相比,其围手术期结果,特别是不同体重指数(BMI)类别的围手术期结果尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较GUA与COT围手术期预后,探讨PTC患者BMI与围手术期相关指标的关系。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入湖州市中心医院于2023年10月1日至2024年10月1日期间行甲状腺手术并病理证实为PTC的411例患者。根据手术入路将患者分为GUA组和COT组。根据亚洲人群的BMI标准,患者被分为体重过轻、正常体重或超重/肥胖。临床及围手术期资料的收集和分析采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) 27.0版本。进行组间比较、相关分析和多变量二元逻辑回归分析。结果:411例患者中,144例行GUA, 267例行COT。在正常体重组和超重组中,GUA组的手术时间明显长于COT组。在所有BMI亚组中,GUA组的术后引流量明显较高。在正常体重组和超重组中,GUA组的淋巴结清扫数量明显减少,住院费用明显增加。常见的术后并发症很少,两组在BMI水平上具有可比性,而GUA术后的美容满意度往往更高。BMI与大多数围手术期指标相关性较弱;然而,在超重患者中,BMI与结节大小呈正相关。结节大小与病理N分期独立相关[优势比(OR) =1.097, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.031-1.169, P=0.004]。结论:与COT相比,GUA与较长的手术时间、较大的术后引流量、较高的费用和较少的淋巴结回收相关,但在精心挑选的患者中显示出相当的短期安全性。BMI不是病理性N期的独立预测因子,但其与超重患者结节大小的关联提示身体习惯与肿瘤负荷之间可能存在关系。在选择低风险PTC手术入路时,应考虑BMI、肿瘤特征、安全性、美容期望和医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书