Preferences for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to help detect skin cancer in primary care settings: a UK-wide discrete choice experiment (DCE).

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Owain T Jones, Fiona M Walter, Rubeta N Matin, Natalia Calanzani, Jon Emery, M van der Schaar, Stephen Morris
{"title":"Preferences for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to help detect skin cancer in primary care settings: a UK-wide discrete choice experiment (DCE).","authors":"Owain T Jones, Fiona M Walter, Rubeta N Matin, Natalia Calanzani, Jon Emery, M van der Schaar, Stephen Morris","doi":"10.1038/s41416-026-03611-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>AI technologies could help triage suspicious skin lesions. The aim of this study was to examine preferences of general practitioners (GPs), patients, and members of the public for different attributes of AI technologies to help detect skin cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DCE using online surveys, with choice scenarios based on: false negative and positive rates, cost, location of AI technology, efficacy on different skin tones, and guideline recommendations. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2302 participants completed the survey. All attributes significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. Ranking of attributes by relative importance was the same for GPs, patients, and members of the public: false negative rate was the most important attribute, followed by skin tones on which the technology had been developed and tested. False negative results had a significantly greater negative effect on GP choices than for other groups. Participants preferred AI technologies used by healthcare professionals in a GP surgery over AI technologies patients use at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of AI technologies to detect skin cancer should focus on minimising false negative rates. Development and testing of AI technologies using data across all skin tones is essential. Preferences for AI technologies could have significant implications for successful implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03611-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: AI technologies could help triage suspicious skin lesions. The aim of this study was to examine preferences of general practitioners (GPs), patients, and members of the public for different attributes of AI technologies to help detect skin cancer.

Methods: A DCE using online surveys, with choice scenarios based on: false negative and positive rates, cost, location of AI technology, efficacy on different skin tones, and guideline recommendations. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models.

Results: 2302 participants completed the survey. All attributes significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. Ranking of attributes by relative importance was the same for GPs, patients, and members of the public: false negative rate was the most important attribute, followed by skin tones on which the technology had been developed and tested. False negative results had a significantly greater negative effect on GP choices than for other groups. Participants preferred AI technologies used by healthcare professionals in a GP surgery over AI technologies patients use at home.

Conclusions: Implementation of AI technologies to detect skin cancer should focus on minimising false negative rates. Development and testing of AI technologies using data across all skin tones is essential. Preferences for AI technologies could have significant implications for successful implementation.

对使用人工智能(AI)技术帮助在初级保健环境中检测皮肤癌的偏好:英国范围内的离散选择实验(DCE)。
背景:人工智能技术可以帮助鉴别可疑的皮肤病变。本研究的目的是研究全科医生(gp)、患者和公众对人工智能技术不同属性的偏好,以帮助检测皮肤癌。方法:采用在线调查的DCE,选择方案基于:假阴性和阳性率、成本、人工智能技术的位置、对不同肤色的疗效以及指南建议。使用选择性特定条件logit回归模型分析数据。结果:2302名参与者完成了调查。所有属性都显著影响被调查者的偏好。对于全科医生、患者和公众来说,属性的相对重要性排序是相同的:假阴性率是最重要的属性,其次是肤色,该技术是根据肤色开发和测试的。假阴性结果对GP选择的负面影响明显大于其他组。与患者在家使用的人工智能技术相比,参与者更喜欢医疗保健专业人员在全科医生手术中使用的人工智能技术。结论:实施人工智能技术检测皮肤癌应侧重于尽量减少假阴性率。利用所有肤色的数据开发和测试人工智能技术至关重要。对人工智能技术的偏好可能对成功实施产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书