Nicola-Hans Schwarzer, Paula Dees, Sophia Köstler, Pierre-Carl Link, Hendrik Lohse-Bossenz
{"title":"Distinct or similar? Career choice motivation in preservice special education and secondary school teachers","authors":"Nicola-Hans Schwarzer, Paula Dees, Sophia Köstler, Pierre-Carl Link, Hendrik Lohse-Bossenz","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.70164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Career choice motives play a central role in teacher development, professional commitment and retention. Although special education is often assumed to attract individuals with strong pedagogical and altruistic motives and lower extrinsic orientations, empirical evidence is inconsistent. This study examines whether preservice special education teachers in Germany differ systematically in their career choice motives from preservice secondary school teachers. Data were drawn from two samples in Baden-Württemberg, Germany: 703 preservice special education teachers and 1012 preservice secondary school teachers. Career choice motives were assessed using self-reports. After establishing the factorial validity and partial scalar invariance, latent mean analyses were conducted controlling for age and gender. Preservice special education teachers reported higher self-efficacy and lower instrumental motives than preservice secondary school teachers. No group differences emerged for pedagogical interest. Unexpectedly, preservice special education teachers reported higher subject-related interest. Social influences did not differ between groups. Findings suggest that preservice special education teachers do not exhibit a uniform motivational pattern but rather a hybrid configuration of motivational orientations that combines theoretically expected and unexpected elements. The results highlight the need for refined motivational models and further longitudinal research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.70164","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.70164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Career choice motives play a central role in teacher development, professional commitment and retention. Although special education is often assumed to attract individuals with strong pedagogical and altruistic motives and lower extrinsic orientations, empirical evidence is inconsistent. This study examines whether preservice special education teachers in Germany differ systematically in their career choice motives from preservice secondary school teachers. Data were drawn from two samples in Baden-Württemberg, Germany: 703 preservice special education teachers and 1012 preservice secondary school teachers. Career choice motives were assessed using self-reports. After establishing the factorial validity and partial scalar invariance, latent mean analyses were conducted controlling for age and gender. Preservice special education teachers reported higher self-efficacy and lower instrumental motives than preservice secondary school teachers. No group differences emerged for pedagogical interest. Unexpectedly, preservice special education teachers reported higher subject-related interest. Social influences did not differ between groups. Findings suggest that preservice special education teachers do not exhibit a uniform motivational pattern but rather a hybrid configuration of motivational orientations that combines theoretically expected and unexpected elements. The results highlight the need for refined motivational models and further longitudinal research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.