Exploring neuro-inclusivity by design in assessment: A scoping review

IF 1.8 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Louise Badham, Rebecca Chivers
{"title":"Exploring neuro-inclusivity by design in assessment: A scoping review","authors":"Louise Badham,&nbsp;Rebecca Chivers","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding of neurodivergent characteristics remains limited in educational assessment, which hinders inclusive design approaches. Consequently, assessment design processes can fail to prevent unintended barriers being introduced in assessment, which can negatively impact neurodivergent learners' academic performance and emotional wellbeing. Guided by PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a scoping review was conducted to examine neurodivergent learners' assessment challenges and neuro-inclusive assessment design strategies. Overall, 23 studies were reviewed. Autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and dyslexia were most frequently examined in the literature, with neurodevelopmental differences such as dyspraxia and dyscalculia underrepresented. Following a grounded theory approach to qualitative data analysis, three broad themes emerged from the review: (1) pedagogical considerations, (2) understanding neurodivergent learners and (3) approaches to assessment. Pedagogical considerations include a need for greater awareness amongst educators and improved institutional infrastructures to foster inclusive learning environments. Understanding neurodivergent learners involves recognising specific neurodivergent characteristics that pose challenges in assessments, such as difficulties with sensory sensitivity and distorted time perception in formal, timed exams. Finally, approaches to assessment prioritise inclusion-by-design, such as participatory design methods, rather than relying exclusively on post hoc accommodations. Such approaches can support fairer, more valid assessments that more accurately capture the strengths and abilities of neurodivergent learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.70161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding of neurodivergent characteristics remains limited in educational assessment, which hinders inclusive design approaches. Consequently, assessment design processes can fail to prevent unintended barriers being introduced in assessment, which can negatively impact neurodivergent learners' academic performance and emotional wellbeing. Guided by PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a scoping review was conducted to examine neurodivergent learners' assessment challenges and neuro-inclusive assessment design strategies. Overall, 23 studies were reviewed. Autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and dyslexia were most frequently examined in the literature, with neurodevelopmental differences such as dyspraxia and dyscalculia underrepresented. Following a grounded theory approach to qualitative data analysis, three broad themes emerged from the review: (1) pedagogical considerations, (2) understanding neurodivergent learners and (3) approaches to assessment. Pedagogical considerations include a need for greater awareness amongst educators and improved institutional infrastructures to foster inclusive learning environments. Understanding neurodivergent learners involves recognising specific neurodivergent characteristics that pose challenges in assessments, such as difficulties with sensory sensitivity and distorted time perception in formal, timed exams. Finally, approaches to assessment prioritise inclusion-by-design, such as participatory design methods, rather than relying exclusively on post hoc accommodations. Such approaches can support fairer, more valid assessments that more accurately capture the strengths and abilities of neurodivergent learners.

通过评估设计探索神经包容性:范围回顾
对神经分化特征的理解在教育评估中仍然有限,这阻碍了包容性设计方法。因此,评估设计过程可能无法防止在评估中引入意想不到的障碍,这可能对神经发散型学习者的学习成绩和情绪健康产生负面影响。在PRISMA-ScR指南的指导下,进行了范围审查,以检查神经发散性学习者的评估挑战和神经包容性评估设计策略。总共回顾了23项研究。自闭症、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和阅读障碍是文献中最常检查的,而运动障碍和计算障碍等神经发育差异未得到充分体现。在定性数据分析的基础理论方法之后,回顾中出现了三个广泛的主题:(1)教学考虑,(2)理解神经发散型学习者和(3)评估方法。教学方面的考虑包括需要提高教育工作者的认识和改善体制基础设施,以促进包容的学习环境。理解神经发散型学习者需要认识到特定的神经发散性特征,这些特征会给评估带来挑战,比如在正式的定时考试中,感觉灵敏度和扭曲的时间感知方面存在困难。最后,评估方法优先考虑设计的包容性,如参与式设计方法,而不是完全依赖于事后的调整。这种方法可以支持更公平、更有效的评估,更准确地捕捉神经发散型学习者的优势和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书