Joint Postprocessing of Air and Dew Point Temperature Ensemble Forecasts With Machine Learning

IF 3.1 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Enric Casellas, Josep-Ramon Miró, Maria Cortès, Vicent Altava-Ortiz, Jordi Moré
{"title":"Joint Postprocessing of Air and Dew Point Temperature Ensemble Forecasts With Machine Learning","authors":"Enric Casellas,&nbsp;Josep-Ramon Miró,&nbsp;Maria Cortès,&nbsp;Vicent Altava-Ortiz,&nbsp;Jordi Moré","doi":"10.1002/met.70237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estimation of forecast uncertainty is essential for operational meteorology, especially in the context of global warming, where the frequency and intensity of extreme events such as heat waves are increasing. Ensemble prediction systems are widely used to represent forecast uncertainty, but their raw output typically requires statistical postprocessing to improve reliability and correct systematic errors. This study focuses on the joint probabilistic postprocessing of air temperature (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {T}_{\\mathrm{a}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) and dew point temperature (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {T}_{\\mathrm{d}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>), two closely related variables that are key inputs for the estimation of humidity-related variables and thermal comfort indices. Two postprocessing frameworks are compared. The first is a two-step approach based on univariate calibration using Distributional Regression Networks (DRN), combined with Ensemble Copula Coupling (ECC) to reconstruct the dependence structure between the two variables. The second is a one-step multivariate approach in which marginal distributions and their dependence structure are modelled simultaneously. Within this framework, two alternative parametrisation are compared: a bivariate DRN, which estimates all parameters through a neural network, and a classical bivariate Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) model, in which the same parameters are estimated as affine functions of the raw ensemble. The methods are evaluated using a 10-member multi-model ensemble and observations from an automatic weather station network. Results indicate that the bivariate DRN approach improves performance in terms of both univariate and multivariate verification metrics. Compared with the DRN-Univariate + ECC approach, the bivariate DRN achieves improved multivariate skill while maintaining similar marginal performance, highlighting the benefit of explicitly modelling inter-variable dependence rather than reconstructing it from the raw ensemble. Compared with Bivariate EMOS, which adopts the same one-step bivariate Gaussian formulation, the bivariate DRN consistently achieves better univariate and multivariate skill, suggesting that the flexibility of the neural network implementation provides additional predictive skill. Rank histograms, however, show similar calibration performance for both approaches. Overall, the results suggest that a bivariate DRN approach is a promising option for operational implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimation of forecast uncertainty is essential for operational meteorology, especially in the context of global warming, where the frequency and intensity of extreme events such as heat waves are increasing. Ensemble prediction systems are widely used to represent forecast uncertainty, but their raw output typically requires statistical postprocessing to improve reliability and correct systematic errors. This study focuses on the joint probabilistic postprocessing of air temperature ( T a $$ {T}_{\mathrm{a}} $$ ) and dew point temperature ( T d $$ {T}_{\mathrm{d}} $$ ), two closely related variables that are key inputs for the estimation of humidity-related variables and thermal comfort indices. Two postprocessing frameworks are compared. The first is a two-step approach based on univariate calibration using Distributional Regression Networks (DRN), combined with Ensemble Copula Coupling (ECC) to reconstruct the dependence structure between the two variables. The second is a one-step multivariate approach in which marginal distributions and their dependence structure are modelled simultaneously. Within this framework, two alternative parametrisation are compared: a bivariate DRN, which estimates all parameters through a neural network, and a classical bivariate Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) model, in which the same parameters are estimated as affine functions of the raw ensemble. The methods are evaluated using a 10-member multi-model ensemble and observations from an automatic weather station network. Results indicate that the bivariate DRN approach improves performance in terms of both univariate and multivariate verification metrics. Compared with the DRN-Univariate + ECC approach, the bivariate DRN achieves improved multivariate skill while maintaining similar marginal performance, highlighting the benefit of explicitly modelling inter-variable dependence rather than reconstructing it from the raw ensemble. Compared with Bivariate EMOS, which adopts the same one-step bivariate Gaussian formulation, the bivariate DRN consistently achieves better univariate and multivariate skill, suggesting that the flexibility of the neural network implementation provides additional predictive skill. Rank histograms, however, show similar calibration performance for both approaches. Overall, the results suggest that a bivariate DRN approach is a promising option for operational implementation.

基于机器学习的空气和露点温度集合预报联合后处理
对预报不确定性的估计对于业务气象学至关重要,特别是在全球变暖的背景下,热浪等极端事件的频率和强度都在增加。集合预测系统广泛用于表示预测的不确定性,但其原始输出通常需要统计后处理以提高可靠性和纠正系统误差。本文重点研究了气温(t1 $$ {T}_{\mathrm{a}} $$)和露点温度(t1 $$ {T}_{\mathrm{d}} $$)的联合概率后处理。两个密切相关的变量是估计湿度相关变量和热舒适指数的关键输入。比较了两种后处理框架。首先,采用分布回归网络(DRN)进行单变量标定,结合集成Copula耦合(ECC)重构两个变量之间的依赖关系结构。第二种是一步多变量方法,其中边际分布及其依赖结构同时建模。在此框架内,比较了两种可选的参数化:通过神经网络估计所有参数的二元DRN和经典的二元集成模型输出统计(EMOS)模型,其中相同的参数被估计为原始集成的仿射函数。使用一个10个成员的多模式集合和一个自动气象站网络的观测对这些方法进行了评估。结果表明,二元DRN方法在单变量和多变量验证指标方面都提高了性能。与DRN-单变量+ ECC方法相比,二元DRN在保持相似边际性能的同时提高了多变量技能,突出了明确建模变量间依赖关系的好处,而不是从原始集合中重建它。与采用相同的一步二元高斯公式的二元EMOS相比,二元DRN在单变量和多变量方面都取得了更好的效果,这表明神经网络实现的灵活性提供了额外的预测技能。然而,两种方法的秩直方图显示出相似的校准性能。总体而言,结果表明,二元DRN方法是一种有希望的操作实施选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meteorological Applications
Meteorological Applications 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Meteorological Applications is to serve the needs of applied meteorologists, forecasters and users of meteorological services by publishing papers on all aspects of meteorological science, including: applications of meteorological, climatological, analytical and forecasting data, and their socio-economic benefits; forecasting, warning and service delivery techniques and methods; weather hazards, their analysis and prediction; performance, verification and value of numerical models and forecasting services; practical applications of ocean and climate models; education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书