{"title":"A Comprehensive Study of Transfer Learning, Resolution Reduction, and Multi-View Classification for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammograms","authors":"Daniel G. P. Petrini, Hae Yong Kim","doi":"10.1002/ima.70436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mammography, an X-ray–based imaging technique, remains central to the early detection of breast cancer. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled increasingly sophisticated computer-aided diagnostic methods, evolving from patch-based classifiers to whole-image approaches and then to multi-view architectures that jointly analyze complementary projections. Despite this progress, several critical questions remain unanswered. Although individual aspects of CNN-based mammogram classification—such as patch pretraining, backbone transferability, and multi-view fusion—have been studied separately in prior work, no unified comparison has examined them under controlled conditions across datasets of contrasting image quality. In this study, we close that gap through a systematic empirical investigation organized around five interrelated questions: (1) the role of patch classifiers, (2) the transferability of natural-image-trained backbones, (3) the advantages of “learn-to-resize” over conventional downscaling, (4) the contribution of multi-view integration, and (5) the robustness of findings across varying image quality. Questions (3) and (5) are addressed here for the first time, while questions (1), (2), and (4) are re-examined within a unified protocol that reveals dataset-quality dependencies invisible to prior single-dataset studies. Beyond benchmarking, our experiments demonstrate clear performance gains over prior work. For the CBIS-DDSM dataset, we improved single-view AUC from 0.8153 to 0.8343, and multiple-view AUC from 0.8483 to 0.8658. We also introduce a comparative protocol that places single- and multi-view classifiers on the same evaluation footing—by aggregating per-view single-view predictions into per-exam scores—enabling a statistically valid comparison between the two; using this protocol, we measured a 0.0217 AUC gain from extending single- to multi-view analysis on CBIS-DDSM. On the complete VinDr-Mammo dataset, the multiple-view approach further improved results, achieving a 0.0492 AUC increase over single view and reaching 0.8511 AUC overall. These results establish new state-of-the-art benchmarks, providing clear evidence of the advantages of multi-view architectures for mammogram interpretation. Beyond performance, our analysis offers principled insights into model design and transfer learning strategies, contributing to the development of more accurate and reliable breast cancer screening tools. The inference code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/dpetrini/multiple-view.</p>","PeriodicalId":14027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ima.70436","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ima.70436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mammography, an X-ray–based imaging technique, remains central to the early detection of breast cancer. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled increasingly sophisticated computer-aided diagnostic methods, evolving from patch-based classifiers to whole-image approaches and then to multi-view architectures that jointly analyze complementary projections. Despite this progress, several critical questions remain unanswered. Although individual aspects of CNN-based mammogram classification—such as patch pretraining, backbone transferability, and multi-view fusion—have been studied separately in prior work, no unified comparison has examined them under controlled conditions across datasets of contrasting image quality. In this study, we close that gap through a systematic empirical investigation organized around five interrelated questions: (1) the role of patch classifiers, (2) the transferability of natural-image-trained backbones, (3) the advantages of “learn-to-resize” over conventional downscaling, (4) the contribution of multi-view integration, and (5) the robustness of findings across varying image quality. Questions (3) and (5) are addressed here for the first time, while questions (1), (2), and (4) are re-examined within a unified protocol that reveals dataset-quality dependencies invisible to prior single-dataset studies. Beyond benchmarking, our experiments demonstrate clear performance gains over prior work. For the CBIS-DDSM dataset, we improved single-view AUC from 0.8153 to 0.8343, and multiple-view AUC from 0.8483 to 0.8658. We also introduce a comparative protocol that places single- and multi-view classifiers on the same evaluation footing—by aggregating per-view single-view predictions into per-exam scores—enabling a statistically valid comparison between the two; using this protocol, we measured a 0.0217 AUC gain from extending single- to multi-view analysis on CBIS-DDSM. On the complete VinDr-Mammo dataset, the multiple-view approach further improved results, achieving a 0.0492 AUC increase over single view and reaching 0.8511 AUC overall. These results establish new state-of-the-art benchmarks, providing clear evidence of the advantages of multi-view architectures for mammogram interpretation. Beyond performance, our analysis offers principled insights into model design and transfer learning strategies, contributing to the development of more accurate and reliable breast cancer screening tools. The inference code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/dpetrini/multiple-view.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology (IMA) is a forum for the exchange of ideas and results relevant to imaging systems, including imaging physics and informatics. The journal covers all imaging modalities in humans and animals.
IMA accepts technically sound and scientifically rigorous research in the interdisciplinary field of imaging, including relevant algorithmic research and hardware and software development, and their applications relevant to medical research. The journal provides a platform to publish original research in structural and functional imaging.
The journal is also open to imaging studies of the human body and on animals that describe novel diagnostic imaging and analyses methods. Technical, theoretical, and clinical research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Submissions describing methods, software, databases, replication studies as well as negative results are also considered.
The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following in the context of biomedical research:
Imaging and neuro-imaging modalities: structural MRI, functional MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, ultrasound, EEG, MEG, NIRS etc.;
Neuromodulation and brain stimulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS;
Software and hardware for imaging, especially related to human and animal health;
Image segmentation in normal and clinical populations;
Pattern analysis and classification using machine learning techniques;
Computational modeling and analysis;
Brain connectivity and connectomics;
Systems-level characterization of brain function;
Neural networks and neurorobotics;
Computer vision, based on human/animal physiology;
Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology;
Big data, databasing and data mining.