A Comprehensive Study of Transfer Learning, Resolution Reduction, and Multi-View Classification for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammograms

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Daniel G. P. Petrini, Hae Yong Kim
{"title":"A Comprehensive Study of Transfer Learning, Resolution Reduction, and Multi-View Classification for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammograms","authors":"Daniel G. P. Petrini,&nbsp;Hae Yong Kim","doi":"10.1002/ima.70436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mammography, an X-ray–based imaging technique, remains central to the early detection of breast cancer. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled increasingly sophisticated computer-aided diagnostic methods, evolving from patch-based classifiers to whole-image approaches and then to multi-view architectures that jointly analyze complementary projections. Despite this progress, several critical questions remain unanswered. Although individual aspects of CNN-based mammogram classification—such as patch pretraining, backbone transferability, and multi-view fusion—have been studied separately in prior work, no unified comparison has examined them under controlled conditions across datasets of contrasting image quality. In this study, we close that gap through a systematic empirical investigation organized around five interrelated questions: (1) the role of patch classifiers, (2) the transferability of natural-image-trained backbones, (3) the advantages of “learn-to-resize” over conventional downscaling, (4) the contribution of multi-view integration, and (5) the robustness of findings across varying image quality. Questions (3) and (5) are addressed here for the first time, while questions (1), (2), and (4) are re-examined within a unified protocol that reveals dataset-quality dependencies invisible to prior single-dataset studies. Beyond benchmarking, our experiments demonstrate clear performance gains over prior work. For the CBIS-DDSM dataset, we improved single-view AUC from 0.8153 to 0.8343, and multiple-view AUC from 0.8483 to 0.8658. We also introduce a comparative protocol that places single- and multi-view classifiers on the same evaluation footing—by aggregating per-view single-view predictions into per-exam scores—enabling a statistically valid comparison between the two; using this protocol, we measured a 0.0217 AUC gain from extending single- to multi-view analysis on CBIS-DDSM. On the complete VinDr-Mammo dataset, the multiple-view approach further improved results, achieving a 0.0492 AUC increase over single view and reaching 0.8511 AUC overall. These results establish new state-of-the-art benchmarks, providing clear evidence of the advantages of multi-view architectures for mammogram interpretation. Beyond performance, our analysis offers principled insights into model design and transfer learning strategies, contributing to the development of more accurate and reliable breast cancer screening tools. The inference code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/dpetrini/multiple-view.</p>","PeriodicalId":14027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ima.70436","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ima.70436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mammography, an X-ray–based imaging technique, remains central to the early detection of breast cancer. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled increasingly sophisticated computer-aided diagnostic methods, evolving from patch-based classifiers to whole-image approaches and then to multi-view architectures that jointly analyze complementary projections. Despite this progress, several critical questions remain unanswered. Although individual aspects of CNN-based mammogram classification—such as patch pretraining, backbone transferability, and multi-view fusion—have been studied separately in prior work, no unified comparison has examined them under controlled conditions across datasets of contrasting image quality. In this study, we close that gap through a systematic empirical investigation organized around five interrelated questions: (1) the role of patch classifiers, (2) the transferability of natural-image-trained backbones, (3) the advantages of “learn-to-resize” over conventional downscaling, (4) the contribution of multi-view integration, and (5) the robustness of findings across varying image quality. Questions (3) and (5) are addressed here for the first time, while questions (1), (2), and (4) are re-examined within a unified protocol that reveals dataset-quality dependencies invisible to prior single-dataset studies. Beyond benchmarking, our experiments demonstrate clear performance gains over prior work. For the CBIS-DDSM dataset, we improved single-view AUC from 0.8153 to 0.8343, and multiple-view AUC from 0.8483 to 0.8658. We also introduce a comparative protocol that places single- and multi-view classifiers on the same evaluation footing—by aggregating per-view single-view predictions into per-exam scores—enabling a statistically valid comparison between the two; using this protocol, we measured a 0.0217 AUC gain from extending single- to multi-view analysis on CBIS-DDSM. On the complete VinDr-Mammo dataset, the multiple-view approach further improved results, achieving a 0.0492 AUC increase over single view and reaching 0.8511 AUC overall. These results establish new state-of-the-art benchmarks, providing clear evidence of the advantages of multi-view architectures for mammogram interpretation. Beyond performance, our analysis offers principled insights into model design and transfer learning strategies, contributing to the development of more accurate and reliable breast cancer screening tools. The inference code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/dpetrini/multiple-view.

转移学习、分辨率降低和多视点分类在乳房x光检查中检测乳腺癌的综合研究
乳房x光摄影是一种基于x射线的成像技术,仍然是早期发现乳腺癌的核心。人工智能的最新进展使越来越复杂的计算机辅助诊断方法成为可能,从基于补丁的分类器发展到全图像方法,然后发展到联合分析互补投影的多视图架构。尽管取得了这些进展,但仍有几个关键问题没有得到解答。尽管基于cnn的乳房x线照片分类的各个方面——如贴片预训练、骨干可转移性和多视图融合——在之前的工作中已经单独研究过,但在不同图像质量数据集的受控条件下,还没有对它们进行统一的比较。在本研究中,我们通过围绕五个相互关联的问题进行系统的实证调查来缩小这一差距:(1)补丁分类器的作用,(2)自然图像训练主干的可转移性,(3)“学习调整大小”相对于传统降尺度的优势,(4)多视图集成的贡献,以及(5)不同图像质量下研究结果的鲁棒性。问题(3)和(5)是第一次在这里解决,而问题(1)、(2)和(4)在一个统一的协议中重新检查,该协议揭示了以前的单数据集研究不可见的数据集质量依赖关系。除了基准测试之外,我们的实验表明,与之前的工作相比,性能有了明显的提高。对于CBIS-DDSM数据集,我们将单视图AUC从0.8153提高到0.8343,将多视图AUC从0.8483提高到0.8658。我们还引入了一个比较协议,将单视图和多视图分类器放在相同的评估基础上——通过将每个视图的单视图预测聚合到每个考试的分数中——从而实现两者之间的统计有效比较;使用该协议,我们测量了从CBIS-DDSM扩展到多视图分析的0.0217 AUC增益。在完整的VinDr-Mammo数据集上,多视图方法进一步改善了结果,AUC比单视图增加了0.0492,总体达到0.8511 AUC。这些结果建立了新的最先进的基准,为乳房x光片解释的多视图架构的优势提供了明确的证据。除了性能,我们的分析还为模型设计和迁移学习策略提供了原则性的见解,有助于开发更准确、更可靠的乳腺癌筛查工具。推理代码和经过训练的模型可在https://github.com/dpetrini/multiple-view上公开获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 工程技术-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology (IMA) is a forum for the exchange of ideas and results relevant to imaging systems, including imaging physics and informatics. The journal covers all imaging modalities in humans and animals. IMA accepts technically sound and scientifically rigorous research in the interdisciplinary field of imaging, including relevant algorithmic research and hardware and software development, and their applications relevant to medical research. The journal provides a platform to publish original research in structural and functional imaging. The journal is also open to imaging studies of the human body and on animals that describe novel diagnostic imaging and analyses methods. Technical, theoretical, and clinical research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Submissions describing methods, software, databases, replication studies as well as negative results are also considered. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following in the context of biomedical research: Imaging and neuro-imaging modalities: structural MRI, functional MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, ultrasound, EEG, MEG, NIRS etc.; Neuromodulation and brain stimulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS; Software and hardware for imaging, especially related to human and animal health; Image segmentation in normal and clinical populations; Pattern analysis and classification using machine learning techniques; Computational modeling and analysis; Brain connectivity and connectomics; Systems-level characterization of brain function; Neural networks and neurorobotics; Computer vision, based on human/animal physiology; Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology; Big data, databasing and data mining.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书