When Resources Become Limited: Trophic Niches Shift From Generalism to Specialization in Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae)

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-09-04 DOI:10.1111/aec.70286
Leonardo Vilas-Bôas M. P. de Cerqueira, Damián Villaseñor-Amador, César Murilo de Albuquerque Correa
{"title":"When Resources Become Limited: Trophic Niches Shift From Generalism to Specialization in Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae)","authors":"Leonardo Vilas-Bôas M. P. de Cerqueira,&nbsp;Damián Villaseñor-Amador,&nbsp;César Murilo de Albuquerque Correa","doi":"10.1111/aec.70286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Resource availability and predictability can shape trophic organization in ecological communities. In livestock pastures, cattle dung represents a highly abundant and predictable trophic subsidy for dung beetles, potentially promoting generalist foraging strategies. Here, we test how cattle exclusion affects trophic organization in dung beetle assemblages in the Brazilian Pantanal. We compared dung beetle richness, abundance, assemblage composition, and trophic classification between cattle-grazed and ungrazed pastures (&lt; 20 years of cattle exclusion) using carrion and cattle dung as bait resources. Species richness and abundance did not differ between bait types in either system. However, dung beetle assemblages differed significantly between carrion and dung baits only in ungrazed pastures. In grazed pastures, assemblages were dominated by trophic generalists, whereas ungrazed pastures showed increased trophic specialization, including shifts of four species from generalist to specialist classifications following cattle exclusion. These findings indicate that predictable trophic subsidies homogenize trophic structure by promoting broad resource use, whereas resource limitation restores trophic differentiation and niche partitioning. Our results demonstrate how changes in resource availability can reorganize trophic interactions in decomposer communities and potentially alter patterns of functional complementarity in ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70286","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resource availability and predictability can shape trophic organization in ecological communities. In livestock pastures, cattle dung represents a highly abundant and predictable trophic subsidy for dung beetles, potentially promoting generalist foraging strategies. Here, we test how cattle exclusion affects trophic organization in dung beetle assemblages in the Brazilian Pantanal. We compared dung beetle richness, abundance, assemblage composition, and trophic classification between cattle-grazed and ungrazed pastures (< 20 years of cattle exclusion) using carrion and cattle dung as bait resources. Species richness and abundance did not differ between bait types in either system. However, dung beetle assemblages differed significantly between carrion and dung baits only in ungrazed pastures. In grazed pastures, assemblages were dominated by trophic generalists, whereas ungrazed pastures showed increased trophic specialization, including shifts of four species from generalist to specialist classifications following cattle exclusion. These findings indicate that predictable trophic subsidies homogenize trophic structure by promoting broad resource use, whereas resource limitation restores trophic differentiation and niche partitioning. Our results demonstrate how changes in resource availability can reorganize trophic interactions in decomposer communities and potentially alter patterns of functional complementarity in ecosystems.

当资源变得有限时:屎壳郎(鞘翅目:金龟子科)的营养生态位从一般向专门化转变
资源的可用性和可预测性可以塑造生态群落的营养组织。在牲畜牧场,牛粪对蜣螂来说是一种非常丰富和可预测的营养补贴,潜在地促进了多面手觅食策略。在这里,我们测试了牛排斥如何影响巴西潘塔纳尔地区屎壳虫群落的营养组织。以腐肉和牛粪为饵料,比较了放牧与未放牧(禁牛20年)草场的屎壳郎丰富度、丰度、组合组成及营养分类。两种饵料类型间物种丰富度和丰度均无差异。然而,只有在未放牧的牧场,腐肉和粪饵的蜣螂组合差异显著。在放牧的牧场,牧草组合以营养多面手为主,而未放牧的牧场则表现出营养特色化,包括在牛被排除后,4个物种从营养多面手转向营养专门手。这些结果表明,可预测的营养补贴通过促进资源的广泛利用使营养结构同质化,而资源限制则恢复营养分化和生态位分配。我们的研究结果表明,资源可用性的变化如何重新组织分解者群落中的营养相互作用,并可能改变生态系统中功能互补的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书